- #1
miketem
- 4
- 0
Does anyone knows how to explain (both physics and mathematics) why there's no magnetic mono-pole?
What i mean is: compare with the charge (Q), which is can isolate to mono-pole ( +Q or -Q ), and we can interpret each behavior separately.dE_logics said:Physics can alone do that job.
M.F arises cause of angular motion mostly, and the character of angular motion is that from one side it looks like tuning clockwise and the other side anticlockwise.
As a result you get 2 poles.
Similar can be said about a charged particle in leaner motion; from one side its direction is left, from the other its right.
dE_logics said:You mean what I've said yet unknown?
miketem said:What i mean is: compare with the charge (Q), which is can isolate to mono-pole ( +Q or -Q ), and we can interpret each behavior separately.
xepma said:You are referring to magnetic fields that arise due to some electrical current.
A magnetic monopole is a hypothetical particle that would have a single magnetic pole, either north or south, unlike the familiar magnets that have both north and south poles.
Currently, there is no experimental evidence for the existence of magnetic monopoles in nature. However, some theories in physics suggest their existence, and scientists continue to search for them.
Regular magnets have both a north and south pole, while magnetic monopoles would have only one pole. This means that they can exist independently, unlike regular magnets which always have both poles connected.
Magnetic monopoles would have far-reaching implications in the field of physics. They could help explain various phenomena, such as the quantization of electric charge and the origin of magnetic fields in the universe.
Scientists have been trying to create magnetic monopoles in a laboratory by using high-energy collisions and creating specific conditions, but so far, they have not been successful. The search for magnetic monopoles continues in various experiments and research projects.