What is the Angular Velocity of a Falling Cube in Unstable Equilibrium?

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem involving a uniform cube placed in unstable equilibrium on a rough horizontal table and allowed to fall. The goal is to show that the angular velocity of the cube when it hits the table can be calculated using the equation w^2 = 3/4 (root2 - 1)g/a, assuming the table is sufficiently rough to prevent sliding. The conversation involves calculations of moment of inertia and changes in potential and kinetic energy to arrive at the final equation. The angle at which the cube is initially placed and the height of its center of mass above the table are important factors in solving the problem.
  • #1
Bucky
82
0
A uniform cube of side 2a is placed in unstable equilibrium with one edge in contact with a rough horizontal table and allowed to fall. Show that, if w is the angular velocity when a face of the cube comes into contact with the table, then

w^2 = 3/4 (root2 - 1) g/a ,

provided the table is sufficiently rough to prevent sliding.


Well here's what I've done. I think I've missed the mark big time with this one...

MI = 2/3 Ma^2
= 2/3 m(2a)^2
= 14/3 ma^2

Initial Energy = 0 + mgh
KE + PE

Energy Just Before Impact = ((1/2 Iw^2)/-KE) + 0/PE

By Energy Conservation

1/2 Iw^2 = mgh (h=2a)
Iw^2 = 4mga
w^2 = (4mga)/I

w^2 = 4mga/(14/3)ma^2

w^2 = 12/14 (g/a)


can anyone point out where I started going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Bucky said:
MI = 2/3 Ma^2
= 2/3 m(2a)^2
= 14/3 ma^2
Not sure what you are doing here. What's the moment of inertia of a cube about one edge? (Depending on what you know, you may need to use the parallel axis theorem.)

Initial Energy = 0 + mgh
KE + PE

Energy Just Before Impact = ((1/2 Iw^2)/-KE) + 0/PE

By Energy Conservation

1/2 Iw^2 = mgh (h=2a)
What's the change in gravitational PE as the cube falls from its initial position to its final position? (Hint: What happens to the center of mass?)
 
  • #3
ok it seems I am wrong from the word go..i only have the equation of innertia for an axis about the centre of the cube parallel to an axis (which is the one i used).

so using the parallel axis thoerem (which oddly enough we've used for previous questions but I've never recalled being taught it) i get..

MI = 2/3 Ma^2 + Ma^2
= 5/3 Ma^2

that sound right?

as for the second part I'm not sure what you mean. the PE would fall to 0 as the KE rises to equal the PE?
 
  • #4
Bucky said:
MI = 2/3 Ma^2 + Ma^2
= 5/3 Ma^2

that sound right?
No. The distance from the center to the edge is not a.

as for the second part I'm not sure what you mean. the PE would fall to 0 as the KE rises to equal the PE?
How does the height of the center of mass change from initial to final position?
 
  • #5
ah right..a is the distance to a side ,not an edge...so its a triangle you need to make...

...so the distance from centre to an edge is

d^2 = a^2 + a^2
=2a^2
d = root (2a^2)
= root 2 a?

again with part 2 I am not sure how you mean. the height of the centre to the table will change reletive to the angle the edge of the box makes with the table, and the length of the side. should i try to find the distance it travels?
 
  • #6
Bucky said:
...so the distance from centre to an edge is

d^2 = a^2 + a^2
=2a^2
d = root (2a^2)
= root 2 a?
Right.

again with part 2 I am not sure how you mean. the height of the centre to the table will change reletive to the angle the edge of the box makes with the table, and the length of the side. should i try to find the distance it travels?
To find the change in PE you need to know how far the center of mass of the box fell. Realize that if you measure with respect to the table surface, the PE of the box goes from [itex]mgh_1[/itex] to [itex]mgh_2[/itex] where h is the height of center of mass above the table. (It's not zero at any point.)
 
  • #7
sigh, I am totally lost on this question.

i've used the value for d to work out I...

I = 2/3ma^2 + M(root 2 a^2)^2
= 2/3ma^2 + 2ma^2
= 7/3ma^2


but i don't know how to find the height above the table of the centre of the cube, or how that is even relevant. Wouldn't it depend on the angle made by the edge of the box? since no angle is given, do you just use a variable to represent it or asume its at 45 degrees?
 
  • #8
Bucky said:
i've used the value for d to work out I...

I = 2/3ma^2 + M(root 2 a^2)^2
= 2/3ma^2 + 2ma^2
= 7/3ma^2
2 + 2/3 = ?


but i don't know how to find the height above the table of the centre of the cube, or how that is even relevant.
When the box falls, you need to find the change in its PE to calculate its KE at the point when its side hits the table.

Wouldn't it depend on the angle made by the edge of the box? since no angle is given, do you just use a variable to represent it or asume its at 45 degrees?
The initial position of the box is one of unstable equilibrium. That means it's balanced right on its edge.
 
  • #9
er yeah...should be 8/3 ma^2...

so we take the distance from the centre to the table to initially be root 2a^2 (since the distance from the centre to any edge is that)

and the distance from the centre to the table is 'a' when it has fallen.

so...

PE at start = mgh
=mg root 2a^2

PE at end = mgh
=mga

change in PE = change in KE

therefore, if initial KE is zero (yeah? since its starting from rest?)

change in PE = KE when cube hits table?

EDIT ok ..

change in PE =
PE1 - PE2
mg root2a^2 - mga
root2a^2 - a

therefore, KE = root 2a^2 - a

is this right? it sounds right going by the answer, so i just have to use this somewhere?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
never mind, got it. thanks for your help :)
 

1. What is the difference between translational and rotational motion?

Translational motion refers to the movement of an object in a straight line, while rotational motion refers to the movement of an object around a fixed axis.

2. How are linear and angular velocity related?

Linear velocity is the rate of change of an object's position in a straight line, while angular velocity is the rate of change of an object's angular position. They are related by the formula v = ωr, where v is linear velocity, ω is angular velocity, and r is the distance from the object to the axis of rotation.

3. What is the difference between torque and force?

Force is a push or pull on an object, while torque is a force that causes rotation. Force is measured in newtons (N), while torque is measured in newton-meters (N·m).

4. How does the distribution of mass affect the rotational motion of a rigid body?

The distribution of mass affects the rotational motion of a rigid body by determining its moment of inertia, which is a measure of an object's resistance to rotational motion. Objects with more mass further from the axis of rotation will have a larger moment of inertia and therefore experience slower rotational motion.

5. What is the difference between a rigid body and a non-rigid body?

A rigid body is an object that maintains its shape and size even when subjected to external forces, while a non-rigid body is an object that can change its shape and size in response to external forces. Rigid bodies are often used in physics calculations because they make calculations simpler, but non-rigid bodies are also important to study for understanding real-world phenomena.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
878
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
7K
Back
Top