Why would I think I'm not moving?

  • Thread starter Layman
  • Start date
In summary: Does anyone do this in real life? Does anyone actually ask (as the old joke goes) the conductor if Chicago stops here?It is a joke, but some people do actually ask the conductor this question.
  • #36
Layman said:
In order for the SRT to work, each of two observers MUST (not may) BOTH simultaneously claim that only the "other guy" is moving.
Nope. SRT just ALLOWS them to do so. It also ALLOWS both to consider the other guy to be at rest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
A.T. said:
Nope. SRT just ALLOWS them to do so. It also ALLOWS both to consider the other guy to be at rest.

Well, that's not what physicists like Baez tell me.

And, really, you don't need an authority to tell you. Just think about it. If two observers agree that one of them is moving and one of them is not (and it the same "one"), then the speed of light is not constant in all frames, etc.

If both parties agree on which one is moving, you have absolute simultaneity, not relative simultaneity.
 
  • #39
Layman said:
There's nothing you're saying that was not well-understood by, and well explained by, Newton. But Einstein differs from Newton, somehow. How?

Btw, I don't think you can really say that the "absence of ether" is an "experimental fact." It is a postulate, an expediency. Al just said it wasn't necessary, not that it didn't exist. In fact, in later writings, he said there MUST be an ether--he just didn't think it was as Lorentz, Maxwell, et al, thought it to be.

It's when you add the second postulate that the speed of light is the same for all observers that you get SRT. If it were not, then you could measure your absolute velocity by measuring the speed of light in all directions: that would tell you exactly what your universal motion is: your motion relative to the rest of the universe.

The problem is, of course, that you find the speed experimentally to be the same in all directions, so, in a way, this is one reason to conclude that you are not moving wrt the rest of the universe.

By the way, the absence of a universal ether was the subject of the famous Michelson-Morley experiment. It was critical to SRT.
 
  • #40
Layman said:
If two observers agree that one on them is moving ...
There is nothing to "agree" on here, because there so absolute meaning to "moving".
 
  • #41
PeroK said:
It's when you add the second postulate that the speed of light is the same for all observers that you get SRT.

Well, it's more than just that. Lorentz and Poincaire said the same (as far as "measurement") goes.

With respect to Michelson-Morley, the failure to "detect" an ether wind was NOT taken to prove there was no ether. The assumption that there WAS an ether, combined with the inability to detect it, is in fact what led to the LT transformations, which Einstein appropriated wholesale.
 
Last edited:
  • #42
  • #43
If you are inside the train car, all the windows are covered, and the ride is very smooth, there is no experiment you can do to prove either that you are moving or that you are not moving. If you can think of one (aside from removing the covers from the windows), tell us what it is. Even if you do remove the covers from the windows, you still can't prove with physical experiments that you are the one that is moving and it is the Earth that is stationary. Your notion that you are the one that is moving is just a bias.

Chet
 
  • #44
Layman said:
Well, it's more than just that. Lorentz and Poincaire said the same (as far as "measurement") goes.

With respect to Michelson-Morley, the failure to "detect" an ether wind was NOT taken to prove there was no ether. It is in fact what led to the LT transformations, which Einstein appropriated wholesale.

So, you are saying:

a) There is an ether.

b) The speed of light depends on your motion: some observers moving against the ether will measure a higher speed of light.

c) Relativity is wrong.

d) All modern cosmology and particle physics is wrong.

e) Sometime soon, someone will come up with Newton's 4th law of motion, that will set the record straight and we'll all realize relativity was just a 100 years bad dream!

Nature and nature's laws lay hid by night,
God said: "let Newton be" and all was light!

It did not last, the devil howling "yo",
"Let Einstein be", restored the status quo!
 
  • #45
Layman said:
Well, that's not what physicists like Baez tell me.

That is not a valid reference. What did Baez say and where? It is pretty clear that you are misinterpreting it, but without a valid reference, it is hard to say how.
 
  • #46
Chestermiller said:
If you are inside the train car, all the windows are covered, and the ride is very smooth, there is no experiment you can do to prove either that you are moving or that you are not moving. If you can think of one (aside from removing the covers from the windows), tell us what it is. Even if you do remove the covers from the windows, you still can't prove with physical experiments that you are the one that is moving and it is the Earth that is stationary. Your notion that you are the one that is moving is just a bias.

Chet



I could have syphilis right now, and not know it. My "knowing" it has nothing to do with whether it exists, as a physical fact.
 
  • #47
Layman said:
In that case, the "absolute" frame is ...
If the absolute frame is different in each case, then it is not absolute.
 
  • #48
<h2>1. Why do we sometimes feel like we are not moving even though we are?</h2><p>Our brain receives information from various sources, including our eyes, inner ears, and muscles, to determine our body's position and movement. When these sources give conflicting information, such as when we are in a moving vehicle, our brain may interpret it as us not moving.</p><h2>2. Can motion sickness cause us to feel like we are not moving?</h2><p>Yes, motion sickness can cause us to feel like we are not moving. It occurs when there is a disconnect between what our eyes see and what our inner ears sense. This can lead to feelings of dizziness, nausea, and the sensation of not moving even though we are.</p><h2>3. How does our brain perceive movement?</h2><p>Our brain uses a combination of visual, auditory, and sensory information to perceive movement. Our eyes track objects and send visual signals to the brain, while our inner ears detect changes in acceleration and direction. Our muscles and joints also provide sensory information about our body's position and movement.</p><h2>4. Can certain medical conditions affect our perception of movement?</h2><p>Yes, certain medical conditions such as vertigo, inner ear infections, and neurological disorders can affect our perception of movement. These conditions can disrupt the signals sent to our brain, leading to feelings of dizziness or the sensation of not moving.</p><h2>5. Is it possible to train our brain to better perceive movement?</h2><p>Yes, it is possible to train our brain to better perceive movement. Activities such as balance and coordination exercises can help improve the communication between our brain and body, leading to a more accurate perception of movement. Additionally, practicing mindfulness and focusing on our body's sensations can also improve our perception of movement.</p>

1. Why do we sometimes feel like we are not moving even though we are?

Our brain receives information from various sources, including our eyes, inner ears, and muscles, to determine our body's position and movement. When these sources give conflicting information, such as when we are in a moving vehicle, our brain may interpret it as us not moving.

2. Can motion sickness cause us to feel like we are not moving?

Yes, motion sickness can cause us to feel like we are not moving. It occurs when there is a disconnect between what our eyes see and what our inner ears sense. This can lead to feelings of dizziness, nausea, and the sensation of not moving even though we are.

3. How does our brain perceive movement?

Our brain uses a combination of visual, auditory, and sensory information to perceive movement. Our eyes track objects and send visual signals to the brain, while our inner ears detect changes in acceleration and direction. Our muscles and joints also provide sensory information about our body's position and movement.

4. Can certain medical conditions affect our perception of movement?

Yes, certain medical conditions such as vertigo, inner ear infections, and neurological disorders can affect our perception of movement. These conditions can disrupt the signals sent to our brain, leading to feelings of dizziness or the sensation of not moving.

5. Is it possible to train our brain to better perceive movement?

Yes, it is possible to train our brain to better perceive movement. Activities such as balance and coordination exercises can help improve the communication between our brain and body, leading to a more accurate perception of movement. Additionally, practicing mindfulness and focusing on our body's sensations can also improve our perception of movement.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
747
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
923
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top