Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?

In summary, the author of this article argues that we should take the simulation-hypothesis seriously and that if we deny it then we are committed to surprising predictions about the future possibilities for our species. He presents a striking argument showing that we should take into account the possibility that we are living in a computer simulation. Furthermore, he discusses the implications of the hypothesis and argues that there are several negative implications if we are living in a computer simulation.
  • #1
String Theorist
7
0
The Simulation Argument
Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?

Nick Bostrom, PhD
Philosophy Faculty, Oxford University

This website features scholarly investigations into the idea that you might currently be literally living in a computer simulation, running on a computer built by some advanced civilization. Films like The Matrix and novels like Greg Egan's Permutation City have explored the idea that we might be living in virtual reality. But what evidence is there for or against this hypothesis? And what are its implications? The original paper featured here, "Are You Living in Computer Simulation?", presents a striking argument showing that we should take the simulation-hypothesis seriously indeed, and that if we deny it then we are committed to surprising predictions about the future possibilities for our species.

See http://www.simulation-argument.com/ for the details.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have not had time to read the link yet but a quick search shows that there is no reference in the article to Ross Rhodes who has written on the subject from a QM perspective. You might like to have a read.

"A Cybernetic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics"

rhodes@pipeline.com
 
  • #3
Interesting (almost disturbing) implications! I didn't read the entire thing but I glanced over a good portion of it. The thing that strikes me is the fact that the possibility isn't considered that we would become capable of running such simulations, but wouldn't do so in such detail. In other words, we wouldn't make each being sentient. In fact, such a world already exists, has anyone played The Sims?

When considered as a whole across the entire span of human history, what would be gained from simulating billions of humans in detail that couldn't be gained by running the same simulation using cellular automata to aggregate overall behavior? Consider the resources that would be wasted to calculate our everyday obsessions. I won't assume there aren't reasons to do this, but since it seems so unlikely, I think that significantly reduces the odds of us being members of such a simulation versus us being the "original" or "real" race.
 
  • #4
what if it were a paradox we live in, that each human society eventually reverse engineered the mysteries of intelect and fell victim to its own creation, and thus a matrix is processed.

within each matrix another matrix inevidably occurs due to one of the ultimate goals in the world-> to truly understand the workings of how we posses intelect, the creation of AI.

creating several layers/levels of existense... lost in some computer processed psyche world of simulation...

each matrix simulated life may or may not eventually reach the point of reverse engineering intelect to produce AI. but saying it did, it would eventually build an interesting infinite paradox loophole.

scary, and possible in my eyes...

maybe not the fact that it is an infinite paradox, but atleast the fact that the possibility of one matrix world existing could possibly mean that that matrix may eventually become another matrix world for the civilisation in it. like i dunno, 3-4 nested matrixes...

there is also the possibility of the original matrix to recognize this paradox and correct it somehow, but who knows, maybe it wouldn't really matter to the AI...

using the movie the matrix as an example, all the robots really cared about was finding a method of coexisting with the living, finding a center balance in which both humans and robots could continue on there existence... their solution is cold and emotionless... but, alas, a solution... they have taken over the role of 'god' in this way(assuming we were created)...

i know, there is a lot of assuming... but it is an 'either' or 'or' when it comes to these things (one way, or another), so thru all the assumption eventually comes a plausible possibility for the conclusion i have drawn... if god didnt create us than it would be the way it would be if god didnt create us... that's all.

its far fetched, i admit, but its cool when you compare it to our own existence, and think of it as being a multilayered existences like that... dying in this world may just be the game over of some simulation in a different world...

which reminds me another thing I've pondered from time to time:
maybe life is a very 'advanced game' that our higher conciousness likes to 'play', because of the charasteristics of not knowing the meaning of it (until maybe the end), not knowing anything former to it, the linear nature of time, and a cr@p load more reasons related to the nature of life make it interesting and rewarding to whatever these beings i speak of would consider rewarding...

when the possibility that our existence could be a computer simulation, it also brings to the table that our conciousness could be a simulation of any sort. a port to stimulation of the senses we posses... we record, and respond to these stimulations...

all scientific theory and obervational evidence of the universe breaks down at this point, nothing matters the way it did before when you come to realize this...

when i say stimulation i mean seeing, hearing, smelling/tasting, touch... and some believe there are more. whos to say there isnt? as far as I am concerened no one has proven it impossible. and there is evidence of it everywhere ( propose to me with what you think will persuade you to believe that the evidence isn't false, and i will try to produce your request, for those that are interested ) ... oh, I am talking about psychic abilities... i donno which ones in particular but i believe there are people that posses these abilities... (sorry about the sidetracking).
 
  • #5
Originally posted by elibol
what if it were a paradox we live in, that each human society eventually reverse engineered the mysteries of intelect and fell victim to its own creation, and thus a matrix is processed.

within each matrix another matrix inevidably occurs due to one of the ultimate goals in the world-> to truly understand the workings of how we posses intelect, the creation of AI.

creating several layers/levels of existense... lost in some computer processed psyche world of simulation...

each matrix simulated life may or may not eventually reach the point of reverse engineering intelect to produce AI. but saying it did, it would eventually build an interesting infinite paradox loophole.

I doubt this would ever happen. Consider the amount of power that a system would require to maintain such a virtual world in the first place. Then consider the power required for that system to maintain a nested system within itself? As each nested system is created (not necessarily an entire sub-reality, but any additional computation at all), the top-level "mainframe" would need to be upgraded, or would slow down considerably. Sure, we within the system might not notice the slow-down, because 'we' can only process information as fast as the mainframe processes it for us. Regardless, my point is that the quantity of resources required for a project like this would seem to invalidate its careless use. It would likely be run, information would be gathered, and it would be shut down forever. So much for the after-life! =)
 
  • #6
i guess that rules out the possibility of it ever being infinite, but the mainframe should already posseses the processing power to simulate any reality the civilisation should create right?

im not quite sure but i think it would be similar to different layers of volume control.

scaled in a fashion that wouldn't really matter what was being processed, so long as it didnt exceed anything beyond the physics and reality that was created...

so the depth maybe impossible to achieve, but i still think the theory of a couple of nested matrixes still would stand, taken you agree with what i said...

but a part of me still says it still doesn't seem likely...

im unsure =]
 
  • #7
A part of me says it's impossible entirely. I think it's the human part. =) Hope it's right! Anyway, I agree that there could be more than one. In fact, it's entirely possible that the 'mainframe' is so powerful that it simply calculates the movement of every single particle and wave in the virtual universe. In other words, a complete new reality. If that's the case, a nested reality could be created without any additional processing on the mainframe's part, because they are still just electrons, whether they're making a nested Matrix, a TV, or a particle of iron.

The implications of this are actually very interesting, because you (outside the 'system') could make slight alterations in the physics of the world, starting at the big bang, and see how things play out. See how long, on average, before the first signs of life show up. Or how long before the entire universe collapses and bangs again, repeating the cycle, or obliterates itself into nothingness. Oh man the things we could do if we had such a mainframe at our hands! The funny thing is that with such a powerful replication of 'reality' there wouldn't need to be AI. In fact, since the life forms would develop entirely on their own just as real life forms did, it could be argued they are just as much alive as real life forms are.
 
  • #8
You should all watch the 13th floor... ok movie.. but is basically this ideals. briefly glancing at Pergatory comments, the movie highlights most of it.

to the actual article, i'll read it later.
 
  • #9
Originally posted by MacTech
You should all watch the 13th floor... ok movie.. but is basically this ideals. briefly glancing at Pergatory comments, the movie highlights most of it.

to the actual article, i'll read it later.

I have seen that movie! Although I had forgotten about it. Good movie, by the way. I think the synopsis of that movie is entirely possible, except the part about virtual people unplugging into a real person's body while the real person is stuck in the virtual world... brains aren't like hard drives, you can't just overwrite one person with the next. In other words, there is no software in the human brain. Even though two brains may look alike, the neuron connections they have formed over their life would be completely different.
 
  • #10
haha, i stopped reading when u began to explain the movie, got to see it for myself =]

yea i guess it could be reality in itself... deep...
 
  • #11
Originally posted by Pergatory
I have seen that movie! Although I had forgotten about it. Good movie, by the way. I think the synopsis of that movie is entirely possible, except the part about virtual people unplugging into a real person's body while the real person is stuck in the virtual world... brains aren't like hard drives, you can't just overwrite one person with the next. In other words, there is no software in the human brain. Even though two brains may look alike, the neuron connections they have formed over their life would be completely different.

Yeah pretty good movie but was over shadowed by the matrix of course ;) hehe, anyway yes the unplugging of ppl is quiet farfetched, like you said the brain is much more static and different in each person. However would it be so if the brain was just a computer simulation? ;)
 

1. What is the theory of living in a computer simulation?

The theory of living in a computer simulation, also known as the Simulation Hypothesis, suggests that our reality is actually a simulated reality created by advanced beings or entities. This theory is based on the idea that as technology advances, we will eventually have the ability to create simulations that are indistinguishable from reality. Therefore, it is possible that we are currently living in a simulated reality created by a more advanced civilization.

2. What evidence supports the theory of living in a computer simulation?

Some philosophers and scientists argue that the rapid advancements in technology and the possibility of creating simulations indistinguishable from reality are evidence that we are currently living in a simulated reality. Additionally, the idea that our universe follows mathematical laws and principles has led some to believe that it is more likely to be a digital creation rather than a physical reality.

3. Can we ever prove or disprove the theory of living in a computer simulation?

At this point, there is no way to prove or disprove the theory of living in a computer simulation. However, some scientists and philosophers argue that if we were to discover glitches or anomalies in our reality that cannot be explained by natural laws, it could be evidence that we are living in a simulated reality. Others believe that even if we are living in a simulated reality, we may never have the technology or understanding to prove it.

4. What are the potential implications of living in a computer simulation?

If the theory of living in a computer simulation is true, it could have significant implications for our understanding of reality, consciousness, and the nature of existence. It could also raise ethical questions about the intentions and responsibilities of the creators of our simulated reality. Additionally, it could challenge our beliefs and perceptions about the world we live in.

5. How does the theory of living in a computer simulation relate to other philosophical concepts?

The theory of living in a computer simulation has similarities to other philosophical concepts, such as the brain in a vat scenario and the idea of a dream world. These concepts all raise questions about the true nature of reality and how we perceive it. They also challenge our understanding of consciousness and the role of perception in our existence.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
741
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Computing and Technology
2
Replies
44
Views
11K
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top