Facing the Truth that my school is terrible

  • Thread starter lubuntu
  • Start date
  • Tags
    School
In summary, the State University discussed in this conversation has a high percentage of commuter students and a low number of students in science programs. Admission is not very competitive and classes tend to be simplified, resulting in a high failure rate despite easy tests. The author is considering transferring to a more challenging university but is unsure about their academic and career goals. Other participants in the conversation suggest getting good grades and taking advantage of research opportunities, and warn against expressing dissatisfaction with the current university while also struggling academically. There is also discussion of personal motivation and the tediousness of computation-based classes.
  • #1
lubuntu
467
2
I go to a State University which mostly focuses on commuters and I guess that less than 5% of the student population is in sciences. Admission is pretty lax. I have noticed the classes more or less suck because everything is brought down to it's most base level. For example in physics I we ignored Calc for the most part even though it was a calc based physics course because it was to hard and some people hadn't taken it yet. In physics II although everyone has taken calc I we still avoid calc because they didn't understand it. Professors give pretty easy tests and yet more than half the class fails. In my Intro to Java class with 50 people to start >10 were left to finish the course.

I don't really know what to make of it, this semester I've stopped going to my Physics course, since it is at 8am and I don't really feel like I need to hear the same lecture 3 times in simpler and simpler terms, which is what our physics class devolves to, I have no trouble learning the stuff just using online lectures and the texts.

It's not to say that I think I am a genius or anything, I would gather I am pretty average for the sort of person who would take a science or math course in university, but my school just seems to cater to those far below average. I'm not really sure what I am looking for with this posting, but how do I deal with this or put it into context? Did anyone else experience the same thing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1. If you're better than your academic surroundings (and you think the trend will persist), move to the top of your class and transfer. If the work is easy, rejoice and get involved in undergraduate research opportunities that will make you more employable when you graduate.

2. Make sure you're expressing yourself well. There are a couple grammatical errors in your first paragraph alone. While I wouldn't point this out normally, I must say that it reflects badly on you when you yourself are complaining about poor academic standards.
 
  • #3
Mapes said:
1. If you're better than your academic surroundings (and you think the trend will persist), move to the top of your class and transfer. If the work is easy, rejoice and get involved in undergraduate research opportunities that will make you more employable when you graduate.

I agree with this. Even if you can't transfer, you can prove yourself elsewhere in grad school if you need to. Also, make sure you get a 4.0. This may mean attending classes that don't seem worthwhile. Do it anyways. There is no excuse for getting below a 4.0 if the environment is truly how you describe it. A 4.0 from anywhere will go a long way in counterbalancing a relatively poor school reputation, while much less will indicate that you couldn't even handle it there. No one will cut you any slack on this point.
 
  • #4
On the one hand, you are telling us you're too good for your college. On the other, you're telling us that you failed calculus and had to drop two other classes. With a story this complex, I think you might want to get a second, more independent assessment of your abilities. That may prove valuable in your future planning.
 
  • #5
lubuntu, I never experienced the same thing. However the only thing you should worry about is to get good grades. It doesn't really matter if you don't go to lectures if staying at home is more efficient to you.
 
  • #6
What are your academic and career goals? These should probably be considered when contemplating transfering. Even if your classes are not rigorous enough for you, there is no reason you cannot go above and beyond on your own. Think of the lectures simply as a supplement to your own learning. They can be useful but for many they are not necessary for success.
 
  • #7
Vanadium 50 said:
On the one hand, you are telling us you're too good for your college. On the other, you're telling us that you failed calculus and had to drop two other classes. With a story this complex, I think you might want to get a second, more independent assessment of your abilities. That may prove valuable in your future planning.

Touche, however my issues with classes in the past where more due to a failure in motivation and other personal issues during that time period not at all with my ability to do the work. Sounds like a weasel story but it is true.

Now after a few semesters with my colleagues I am seeing that depth of our courses is shallower than at most any other university and tons of students fail tests because they don't even get the watered down explanations and problems.
 
  • #8
fluidistic said:
lubuntu, I never experienced the same thing. However the only thing you should worry about is to get good grades. It doesn't really matter if you don't go to lectures if staying at home is more efficient to you.

It's not even that the lectures are bad it just that we get bogged down in the boring computation stuff instead of discussing the subject at hand, for explain in physics we'd usually spend more time on algebra than anything else, so tedious.
 
  • #9
lubuntu said:
It's not even that the lectures are bad it just that we get bogged down in the boring computation stuff instead of discussing the subject at hand, for explain in physics we'd usually spend more time on algebra than anything else, so tedious.

Get use to it. Unless you mean finding out what 15 divided by 2 is.
 
  • #10
lubuntu said:
my issues with classes in the past where more due to a failure in motivation and other personal issues during that time period not at all with my ability to do the work. Sounds like a weasel story but it is true.

Yes, but you have to look at this as a graduate school will look at it. The message this sends is "was at [and I am going by your description here] a not-very-good school and did poorly there." This is not the message you want to be sending.

But in any event, my advice is serious. You need to get an outside perspective of where you stand. Maybe it will confirm that you are where you think you are.
 
  • #11
When I hear you talking I think it's myself. Stop complaining and go through the details
of the lectures if you are bored. On the one hand you say it's too easy on the other hand you claim the algebra is tedious, that doesn't seem to add up.

You have to work through the algebra and gain a higher perspective make yourself very
familiar with the concepts behind all that. That's the key to success. Be ok with the stuff you
are doing at the moment where you are, you can't run away from that. Be in the moment.Then make a choice if you want to leave this "backwater" then the best way out
are good grades.

So I'm just backing up the other statements.

I'm also some kind of disenchanted my university offers like 99.9% experiments and
I'm more into theory. Always try to make the best out of the situation. Keep going.
 
  • #12
exciton said:
When I hear you talking I think it's myself. Stop complaining and go through the details
of the lectures if you are bored. On the one hand you say it's too easy on the other hand you claim the algebra is tedious, that doesn't seem to add up.

You missed the point, what is tedious is that my physics classes take time to even consider how to do the algebra instead of focusing on physics. Like computationally how to solve a system of equations, not for example the consequences of the formula. Any derivation that requires a good use of calculus is usually ignored since the class wouldn't understand it, etc.
 
  • #13
lubuntu said:
[...] the consequences of the formula. Any derivation that requires a good use of calculus is usually ignored since the class wouldn't understand it, etc.

That's your part of the studies to do both of these things. It's not ignored because
the class wouldn't understand it, it's left out because they want to see that you can manage this
by yourself. We didn't get anything in the lectures close to the problems we should solve.

I felt the exact same way when I was at that stage. Our calculus stuff was always late compared to our physical development, so it was often very boring. They only show you the easy
calculations. It's like in advanced textbooks, the proof is left to the reader.

Is that your problem ?

If not, then I would go ahead and try to take an exam at a university for more
talented people. If you're really very much above that level there will always be
a place where you can do more advanced work.
 
  • #14
exciton said:
That's your part of the studies to do both of these things. It's not ignored because
the class wouldn't understand it, it's left out because they want to see that you can manage this
by yourself. We didn't get anything in the lectures close to the problems we should solve.

I felt the exact same way when I was at that stage. Our calculus stuff was always late compared to our physical development, so it was often very boring. They only show you the easy
calculations. It's like in advanced textbooks, the proof is left to the reader.

Is that your problem ?

If not, then I would go ahead and try to take an exam at a university for more
talented people. If you're really very much above that level there will always be
a place where you can do more advanced work.

Again, I appeciate the feedback but I think your missing the point that at my school, we avoid more difficult stuff because it is swept under the rug and not because we are to figure it out on our own. Of course I do figure it out on my own but I am just frustrated at how the in class session are essentially pointless. More often than not it would just be the same people asking the same basic questions over and over again. For example it took us about 10 tries of explaining how to derive the work done along an isotherm of an ideal gas, because most of the class didn't understand the calculus parts.
 
  • #15
exciton said:
If not, then I would go ahead and try to take an exam at a university for more
talented people. If you're really very much above that level there will always be
a place where you can do more advanced work.

Hi,

never mind.
 
  • #16
One suggestion that I can tell you is to wait until upper division math/physics courses, and it might change a bit. Usually, the introductory courses like your physics class usually have a good amount of students who can't keep up. Eventually, they will leave before they advance to the next level, so your next professor might demand from you a little bit more than your current one (hopefully). I'm no physics major, but that seems to be the case for most departments in most schools.

Also, as everybody suggests, you should keep your grades high, and show your professors that you are different from the other students in class. If your professor sees it, you might get a research position from that professor.
 
  • #17
PieceOfPi said:
One suggestion that I can tell you is to wait until upper division math/physics courses, and it might change a bit. Usually, the introductory courses like your physics class usually have a good amount of students who can't keep up.

That's my interpretation. If they are still letting half the class or more fail, then these are just the weed out courses before you get to the real ones. I also agree with the points made above that if you're not getting the material covered in class, if it's in the textbook, you can still go ahead and learn it on your own. University comes with a good deal of self-directed learning, not just spoon-feeding. If you spent all that money on a textbook, use it.
 
  • #18
lubuntu said:
You missed the point, what is tedious is that my physics classes take time to even consider how to do the algebra instead of focusing on physics. Like computationally how to solve a system of equations, not for example the consequences of the formula. Any derivation that requires a good use of calculus is usually ignored since the class wouldn't understand it, etc.

You're likely in a Physics class with other Physics majors, math majors, chemistry majors, Engineering majors, people planning to go to medical school, biology majors, etc., etc.

It would be great if we could start from day one in a "physics majors only" environment where the full theoretical underpinnings of every subject was covered in all its mathematically beautiful detail...but the American university system isn't that way at your average "state school."

It's the same with math courses. You go through calc I and II with damn near everyone, Calc III with many other science majors, and differential equations and Linear Algebra with Engineering majors. Once you finally get through that, you start the process of "real" mathematics instead of just arbitrary applying rules to get the right answer.

At the end of the day, the quality of the student is what matters.
I doubt you'll find any "great" physicist who relied solely on his or her course material for their physics knowledge.
In fact, I'd be willing to bet that any "great" physicist we all like to read about instead of studying earned the majority of their physics knowledge from self study, not from assigned course material.

My Physics I course is the same way. Its entirely UN-theoretical, and sometimes down right frustrating that students can be confused when the material is presented so "watered down." It's even more frustrating that the watered down material is presented that way because so many students couldn't care less about actually trying to learn the material...and the motivated students are the ones that suffer in order for the university to "dumb it down" enough for those students to be dragged along.

I use the class time to practice deriving formulas from various starting points, finding different ways of solving the same problem, or working through a more advanced book from the library.
But, like others have stated...grades matter to graduate schools. If you're not getting 100% on every quiz and exam, then no matter how watered down the material is, you could still stand to get a better grasp on it.
 
  • #19
Does your school have physics major track physics courses? If so, are you on that track?

If not, then don't worry your classes will get difficult once the premeds, chem majors, math majors, and engineers don't go beyond intro to physics.
 
  • #20
The bottom line is you have to maintain good grades, whether you like it or not. First you do all the computations until it is impressed in your head - if you can't even maintain an interest to do calculations, you won't be doing physics later. Sorry but this is true.
 

1. What are the signs that my school is terrible?

There are several signs that may indicate that your school is not performing well. These include consistently low test scores, high student absenteeism rates, lack of resources and outdated facilities, high teacher turnover rates, and negative feedback from students and parents.

2. How do I know if my school is failing?

One way to determine if your school is failing is to look at its performance on standardized tests. If your school consistently performs below state or national averages, it may be an indication of poor academic performance. Additionally, you can also look at other factors such as graduation rates, student retention rates, and student satisfaction surveys.

3. What can I do if my school is failing?

If you believe your school is failing, there are several steps you can take. First, you can voice your concerns to the school administration and school board. You can also reach out to local and state officials to bring attention to the issue. Additionally, you can become involved in your child's education by attending parent-teacher conferences, volunteering at the school, and advocating for better resources and support for teachers.

4. How can I help improve my school's performance?

There are several ways you can help improve your school's performance. You can start by getting involved in school activities and supporting your child's education at home. You can also volunteer your time and resources to help improve the school's facilities and resources. Additionally, you can advocate for better funding and support for teachers and work with the school administration to implement new strategies and programs to improve academic performance.

5. What should I do if my child is struggling in a failing school?

If your child is struggling in a failing school, it is important to first communicate with their teachers and the school administration. They may be able to provide resources and support to help your child succeed. Additionally, you can explore other educational options such as transferring to a different school or enrolling in a tutoring program. It is also important to provide support and encouragement to your child during this difficult time.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
948
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
854
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
804
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
429
Back
Top