Solving nonlinear Telegrapher's equation (non-constant speed)

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem with a nonlinear PDE, specifically the 4-D telegraph equation. It is mentioned that the solution obtained using the method of separation of variables is the Bessel function, but when a parameter limit is taken close to zero, the solution approaches zero and the telegraph equation reduces to the ordinary wave equation. The question is whether there is something wrong with the calculation method, to which the answer is that there likely is an issue with the method and precautions should be taken when dealing with small parameter limits. Additionally, the equation should be properly transformed before applying the separation of variables technique.
  • #1
Skema_Fish
1
0
Hi
I had a problem with a nonlinear PDE. The equation is 4-D telegraph equation in which the velocity of propagation of the wave is varied with time. If the equation is solved by using the method of separation of variables, then the solution obtained is the Bessel function. The problem is when a parameter (for example, say "a") limit is taken close to zero, then the solution of the telegraph equation approaches zero. In fact, from the telegraph equation itself can be seen that if the parameter limit is taken close to zero then the solution & telegraph equation itself reduces to ordinary wave equation.

The equation is

[itex]\ddot{\psi}[/itex][itex]+{5a}[/itex][itex]\dot{\psi}[/itex] [itex]={\frac{e^{-2at}}{A^{2}}\nabla^{2}\psi}[/itex]

the question is: is there something wrong with my calculation method? I followed every step properly but the results are not satisfactory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The answer to your question is that there is likely something wrong with your calculation method. You need to be careful when taking a parameter limit close to zero, as this can lead to numerical issues due to the small number of digits being used in the calculations. Additionally, you should make sure that the equation is properly transformed into the form needed for the separation of variables technique to be applied.
 

1. What is the Telegrapher's equation?

The Telegrapher's equation is a partial differential equation that describes the propagation of electromagnetic signals along a transmission line. It takes into account both the capacitance and inductance of the line, as well as the resistance and conductance of the medium.

2. What makes the Telegrapher's equation nonlinear?

The Telegrapher's equation is nonlinear because it involves the square of the voltage and current terms. This makes the equation more complex and difficult to solve compared to linear equations.

3. Why is it important to consider non-constant speed in solving the Telegrapher's equation?

The speed of the electromagnetic wave along a transmission line is affected by various factors such as the medium and its properties, which may not be constant. Not considering this can lead to inaccurate results and predictions.

4. What are some methods for solving the nonlinear Telegrapher's equation?

Some common methods for solving the nonlinear Telegrapher's equation include the method of characteristics, finite difference methods, and spectral methods. Each method has its own advantages and limitations, and the choice of method depends on the specific problem at hand.

5. How can the solution of the nonlinear Telegrapher's equation be validated?

The solution of the nonlinear Telegrapher's equation can be validated by comparing it with experimental data or by using other numerical methods. It is also important to ensure that the solution satisfies the initial and boundary conditions of the problem.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
994
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
946
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
180
  • Differential Equations
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top