Do mathematicians believe in axioms..

  • Thread starter A=B
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Axioms
In summary, mathematicians use axioms as a starting point for their thinking, while those who believe in God use their belief to stop thinking. Axioms are not seen as obviously true statements, but rather accepted as true within a particular system. In contrast, belief in God is seen as absolute and unchanging. However, just as some sets of rules in card games can be considered "dumb," some sets of axioms may be seen as flawed or contradictory. This does not affect the validity of deductions made within a particular system, but rather raises questions about the system itself.
  • #1
A=B
1
0
:rolleyes: Do a mathematician believe in AXIOM like some people believe in GOD

People who believe in GOD need not to proof GOD, is that like the way mathematician do with AXIOM ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Not at all.
Why do you think so?
 
  • #3
Just out of curiosity, what do you mean by AXIOM?

I know what an "axiomatic system" is, I know the definition of the word "axiom", and I know a number of "axioms" but I don't recognize the concept AXIOM.

You may be making the common mistake of thinking that an "axiom" is "an obviously true statement". I don't think any mathematician would be so bold as to claim that any statement was "obviously true"! We've seen too many exceptions!

In mathematics an axiom is defined to be "true" in a particular system- its acceptance in effect defining the system. (I.e. "accepted as true for the sake of argument".) Any mathematican would accept Euclid's axiom "two points determine a single line" as being true in Euclidean geometry but not in spherical geometry.

I doubt that any religious person will accept God as being "true" in some cases but not others!
 
  • #4
Just a follow-up on Halls' comment:

You probably know many card games, each one having its own specific rules as to what valid "moves" are.
Now, do you regard one such set of rules to be the only valid way to pass the time with a deck of cards?

Similarly with maths:
With different sets of ground rules for what is "valid" you get different types of math games.
You can't say in general that one such set of rules is "truer" than any other such set.

However, some particular sets of rules might be regarded as "dumb":
For example, consider a card game that in some situation said both that a particular "move" is permitted, and in the same breath said that that move was forbidden. That is, the set of rules is self-contradictory, and hence dumb.

Such system weaknesses ought of course be avoided, but in complicated logical systems, it is not always apparent whether or not a particular set of rules can generate internal contradictions or not.
But this feature does not in any way make it more (or less) difficult to ascertain whether a particular deduction in a particular system is valid or not, it only makes it more difficult to ascertain whether the particular set of rules used is a good or bad idea in the first place.
 
  • #5
Mathematicians believe in their axioms so that they have a place to start their thinking, those who believe in God do so because it allows them to stop thinking.
 

1. Do mathematicians believe in axioms?

Yes, mathematicians believe in axioms as they serve as the foundation for logical reasoning and mathematical proofs.

2. What are axioms in mathematics?

Axioms are statements or principles that are assumed to be true without the need for proof. They are the fundamental building blocks of mathematical systems.

3. How do mathematicians use axioms?

Mathematicians use axioms as starting points for logical reasoning and to derive new mathematical theorems and proofs.

4. Are axioms always true in mathematics?

No, axioms are not always true in the real world. They are simply assumed to be true within a particular mathematical system in order to establish a framework for logical reasoning.

5. Can axioms be changed or replaced?

Yes, in some cases, axioms can be changed or replaced in order to create new mathematical systems or to explore different possibilities within a given system. However, this process must be done carefully and with logical justification.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
610
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
804
Replies
72
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top