Learn the general case first, or the special case first?

  • Thread starter andytoh
  • Start date
  • Tags
    General
In summary, By studying the generalization of a topic, you learn all the properties that other related topics share with the topic you want to study, and thus you can more easily learn the other topics due to the foreknowledge you've gained, and also should understand the original topic more. On the other hand, by studying a special case of the topic, you learn specialized properties which does not hold in the general case and you understand the original topic more quickly. It is better to study the general case first in order to have a solid understanding and appreciation for the special case. This approach may also lead to more efficient learning and less backtracking. However, some may find studying the special case first more enjoyable and helpful in understanding the general case
  • #1
andytoh
359
3
By studying the generalization of a topic, you learn all the properties that other related topics share with the topic you want to study, and thus you can more easily learn the other topics due to the foreknowledge you've gained, and also should understand the original topic more. On the other hand, by studying a special case of the topic, you learn specialized properties which does not hold in the general case and you understand the original topic more quickly.

I believe both the special case and the general case should be studied to get a full understanding of the topic. My question which is the better ORDER to optimize your understanding during the learning process?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In case you find my question too vague, let me give you an example. Suppose you wanted to study Hilbert spaces, which is an inner product space that is complete in its norm. Should you directly jump into the study of Hilbert spaces? This would certainly make you understand Hilbert spaces quickly.

Or should you first more generally study the properties of metric spaces (and the properties of Cauchy sequences in metric spaces) which has complete normed spaces as a special case, and/or the property of normed spaces (or even more general, Banach spaces) instead of specifially the norm obtained from an inner product. By doing this, you get a better understanding of completeness and norms and so when finally going into Hilbert spaces it is all so much clearer than if you jumped into Hilbert spaces immediately.

Is it better to study Riemannian geometry first or the more general pseduo-Riemannian geometry first, if you want to apply your knowledge to general relativity (which uses the latter)?

And let us assume that time is not a factor. Which is the better order in which to study (and to teach as well)?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I believe that learning the general case first is better, since the special case makes much more sense when you study it after the general case. Learning related topics then usually does not require backtracking and the related topics seem much more related than without having studied the general case first. However, we are usually taught the special case first though due to time constraints.

However, for some reason I find learning Riemannain geometry before pseudo-Riemannian geometry may be better, contradicting myself, and I can't pinpoint why. Also, I studied the projective space before studying the more general Grassmanian manifold and due to the complexity of the the Grassmanian, I think it was the correct order, supporting the opposite view again.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I find that the study of the special case helps me appreciate, more so enjoy, the general case. For maximal efficiency, I would say to do the general case first, and for maximal enjoyment I would say to do the special case first.
 
  • #5
Crosson said:
I find that the study of the special case helps me appreciate, more so enjoy, the general case. For maximal efficiency, I would say to do the general case first, and for maximal enjoyment I would say to do the special case first.

Wow. So general case vs. special case is efficiency vs. joy?
 
  • #6
I do special cases then work out to the general case.

It's probably a byproduct of being a programmer: trying to solve the entire problem in one go is suicide.
 
  • #7
Alkatran said:
trying to solve the entire problem in one go is suicide.
I don't view studying the generalizations to be "solving an entire problem in one go". I think its more like postponing the special topic for later, and collecting more general information first. The special topic can then be learned much more clearly (and probably faster) after having first developed a solid general background.
 
Last edited:

What is the difference between the general case and the special case?

The general case refers to a broad or abstract concept that applies to a variety of situations. The special case, on the other hand, refers to a specific instance or scenario that is a subset of the general case.

Is it better to learn the general case first or the special case first?

It depends on the individual's learning style and the subject matter. Some people find it easier to understand the general concept first and then apply it to specific cases, while others prefer to learn through concrete examples and then grasp the general concept.

What are the benefits of learning the general case first?

Learning the general case first allows for a deeper understanding of the underlying principles and concepts. It also provides a framework for understanding and applying the special cases.

What are the benefits of learning the special case first?

Learning the special case first can be helpful for building foundational knowledge and gaining practical experience. It can also make it easier to understand the general case by providing a tangible example to reference.

Are there any subjects where it is more beneficial to learn the general case first?

There is no definitive answer to this question as it varies depending on the individual and the subject matter. However, learning the general case first may be more beneficial in subjects that involve complex or abstract concepts, such as mathematics or philosophy.

Similar threads

  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
819
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
856
Replies
4
Views
858
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
551
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top