Can we simulate the universe with sentient beings?

  • Thread starter jing
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Universe
In summary: To create this shape you would use a program to create the basic form, then you would use a program to create the texture, light, and shading. You would also need to program in the movement of the character.Then the character would be displayed on the screen.In summary, a simulated universe would need to be able to simulate sight in order for beings to see. It is conjectured that one day it will be possible to produce a simulation of the universe with sentient beings. Obviously many problems will arise. One problem that occurs to me is that such beings would need to be able to 'see'. So how would you simulate light and sight?
  • #1
jing
123
0
It is conjectured that one day it will be possible to produce a simulation of the universe with sentient beings. Obviously many problems will arise.

One that occurs to me is that such beings would need to be able to 'see'. So how would you simulate light and sight?

Any thoughts
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #2
  • #3
Sorry about the question mark.

Ok so how you simulate 'sight' depends on how you simulate a 'thing' that becomes the 'image'.

Given a world with many 'things' and many 'viewers' then how does a 'viewer 'know that a 'thing' is present.

Does the 'viewer' see the 'thing' by an external (to the viewer) subroutine that calculates for all things and all viewers their relative position and what is viewable? OR

Does the viewer see via objects (in the oop sense) internal to the viewer? If so how is information about the 'thing' related to the viewer? Would there be light particles (objects in the oop sense, that 'fly' around the universe from light sources)?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
there's that thing (actually a lot of them) called "ray tracer". is that what you are talking about? I'm sure many of them are in c++ and have some kind of oop architecture, so... look it up.
 
  • #5
jing said:
One that occurs to me is that such beings would need to be able to 'see'. So how would you simulate light and sight?

There are plenty of sentient beings on Earth that can't 'see' (including blind humans). They seem to get along just fine. What's the problem?
 
  • #6
I am talking about a completely simulated universe.

Try the question the other way round.

Suppose our reality is just a computer simulation. How do you think they programmed light?
 
  • #8
Maxwell's equations describe the interrelationship between electric fields, magnetic fields, electric charge, and electric current.

Ok so you can program the equations but what are you applying them to in the simulation. How do you program fundamental particles, or what are there methods and properties going to be?
 
  • #9
jing said:
How do you program fundamental particles
Now you're changing the question again. Well. People are working on it.
 
  • #10
Not really changing the question, just trying to get people to understand what I was actually asking in the first question
 
  • #11
universe simulations would either be direct simulations of a local quantum system by qubits- or a classical simulation of qubits which simulates a quantum system- such a simulation would simply perform the Schrödinger equation in a simple logic gate network as with a cellular automaton- it is thought by many that the processes which generate light/ gravity/ and all the other physical dynamics of our world would naturally emerge at higher scales from the operation of this quantum cellular automaton- [because that is how physics in our universe emerges]

in other words you can do an accurate simulation but still not understand how the physics of the simulated universe works exactly- but a God's-eye-view would help you learn more-
 
Last edited:
  • #12
setAI- thank you for answering the question clearly. My underlying thoughts were whether in creating such a simulation how much insight could be gained into the creation of our universe. Now you have told me about qubits I have been able to read about them on the net and gained insight.
 
  • #13
If you're just trying to reproduce our current perception of the universe you might not need to simulate as far as individual particles or quantum phenomena, certainly not all the time. The uncertainty principle could mean that the modeling system would be able approximate particle states from the information fed to the "sentient beings" only when necessary, while keeping things coherent and avoiding unnecessary computation.

If possible we want to avoid having the CPU waste cycles in things that aren't that relevant such as what a tiny particle in front of me is doing, or what is happening on the dark side of the moon right now, until these things become necessary, and when they do just have the system guess an unimpossible state.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Job - Would that imply that at the macro level of this simulated universe some events would only occur when observations take place. For example the position of stars would only be calculated and re-positioned when observations were taking place?

Or because of the necessity of two observers agreeing on an observable event such as the position of the stars and the predicted position of thses stars in their future is it more efficient to have them continually calculated rather than obtaining the same position through calculations when they are observed?
 
  • #15
As I read somewhere tiny particles can change and shift through simple observation by a person. Therefore every molecule is impossible to specifically calculate because of its constant shifting. Especially on last observation.

As I see it...
If you are thinking video game wise like I am in this sentient being viewing sight scenario then.. There would be a projected geometric shape such as a cone of sight widening a person's sight draw range to infinity (or the ability of such a being with programmed distance limits). Everything outside of this cone of sight would be darkness and completely invisible to the being. It still exists but has no effect on the being except yatta yatta heat ray. . I'm guessing this would be a rudimentary comp simulation at first with AI. Anything further is useless to contemplate because we will never see its implementation at the current rate of technological increase in our sludgy world. (We're slow folks.):yuck:
 
  • #16
-Job- said:
If you're just trying to reproduce our current perception of the universe you might not need to simulate as far as individual particles or quantum phenomena, certainly not all the time.

ultimately all one would have to do to simulate any possible human brain state [and thus any perceivable reality/history/self of any human-level observer who could ever exist in any possible world] is simply a universal simulator of the human brain: an electrochemical simulation of the brain's neural infrastructure that is able to process roughly 10^16 operations per second on 10^15 bits- given the implications of quantum mechanics [especialy the Superposition Principle] the amount of raw information processed by an observer is the limit of coherent information about any physical system that is 'real' to an observer anyway- [and the complexity of the observer's world- the amount of information that is 'real'- is limited by the beckenstein bound of the observer's local environment] so obvioulsy huge simulations of the entire 10^90 bits of the observable universe are not required-
 
Last edited:

1. How do scientists simulate the universe?

Scientists use computer simulations and mathematical modeling to simulate the universe. These simulations involve creating virtual universes with a set of rules and physical laws, and then running them on powerful computers to observe their behavior.

2. What can we learn from simulating the universe?

By simulating the universe, scientists can gain a better understanding of how the universe formed and evolved, as well as the processes that govern its behavior. This can also help us make predictions about future events and test different theories about the universe.

3. How accurate are these simulations?

The accuracy of simulations depends on the complexity of the model and the amount of data used to create it. While simulations may not be 100% accurate, they can still provide valuable insights and help us understand the universe in ways that would otherwise be impossible.

4. Can we simulate the entire universe?

Currently, we do not have the technology or computing power to simulate the entire universe. However, scientists can simulate small sections of the universe and use this data to make inferences about the larger universe.

5. What challenges do scientists face when simulating the universe?

One of the biggest challenges in simulating the universe is dealing with the vast amount of data and the complexity of the systems being simulated. This requires powerful computers and advanced algorithms to process and analyze the data. Another challenge is ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the simulations, as even small errors could lead to significant discrepancies in the results.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
846
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
22
Views
408
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
776
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
4
Views
947
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
743
Back
Top