Uncovering the Mysteries of the Universe: Questions, Answers, and Theories

  • Thread starter wolram
  • Start date
In summary, there are many questions and few answers surrounding the existence of the universe. Some theories invoke new data that is yet to be discovered, while others remain unproven. The tests needed to qualify a theory vary depending on the topic being discussed. Testing for a theory typically includes observation and experimentation. It is still unknown if we will ever be able to have a perfect model of the universe, but based on past experience it is unlikely.
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
their are so many questions and so few answers, is the universe open
closed? is it infinite or finite? does dark energy, dark matter exist?
What are the constants that govern our universe? I have read many
papers that tweek known parameters, or invoke new theories, most
have no testability without more new data, or may be impossible to
disprove.
So my question is what tests are needed to qualify a theory?
How do you select which theory is correct?
what tests are needed to aid a selection?
can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
what tests are needed to qualify a theory?
A theory is useful if it can make predictions which are experimentally testable. Specific tests depend on what the theory is about.
How do you select which theory is correct?
what tests are needed to aid a selection?
When there are competing theories, they will usually make predictions which are different. Perform the experiment measuring them. Alternatively, theories that may look different turn out to be equivalent - example, quantum mechanics in the 1920's Heisenberg and Schroedinger.
can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?
Ever is a long time, but based on past experience, it is highly unlikely.
 
  • #3
wolram said:
their are so many questions and so few answers, is the universe open
closed? is it infinite or finite? does dark energy, dark matter exist?
What are the constants that govern our universe? I have read many
papers that tweek known parameters, or invoke new theories, most
have no testability without more new data, or may be impossible to
disprove.


So my question is what tests are needed to qualify a theory?

Somebody writes a paper proposing it, orally proposes it, or thinks about it in their head. Once done if the statement is proposed to explain something it is a theory. Subcategories of theories are theories about physics and publish theories about physics. The really good theories of physics of any significant duration are published theories about physics.

How do you select which theory is correct?

You do experiments and look at past evidence. You dump the theories that are disproven. You keep the rest in the running and use the ones that are convenient the most.

what tests are needed to aid a selection?

Logic and experimental experience.

can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?

What is a perfect model. If a perfect model is analogous to the rules of chess. Yes. If the perfect model is analagous to the rules of chess plus a recounting of every move that got us to how the board looks today, probably not.

Similarly, we may someday determine every method of genetic change that has ever taken place in evolutionary history. But, because the fossil record is incomplete there will be some species in our evolutionary history which may never be known.
 
  • #4
wolram said:
can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?

I think the Universe is infinitely divisible but math will always be able to describe it although only imperfectly. The metaphor I use is zooming into the Mandelbrot Set attempting to find the connections between nested sets only to find they have grown smaller still !

SD
 

What does "more questions than answers" mean?

"More questions than answers" is a phrase that describes a situation where there are a lot of unanswered questions or uncertainties. It can refer to a specific topic or to a general feeling of confusion or lack of understanding.

Why is it important to have more questions than answers in science?

In science, having more questions than answers is important because it drives the process of inquiry and discovery. By asking questions and seeking answers, scientists can uncover new information and make advancements in their field.

What are some examples of areas in science where there are more questions than answers?

There are many areas in science where there are more questions than answers. Some examples include the origins of the universe, the human brain and consciousness, the nature of dark matter and energy, and the complexities of climate change.

How can having more questions than answers lead to new discoveries?

Having more questions than answers can lead to new discoveries because it encourages scientists to think critically, explore new ideas, and conduct research to find answers. Often, the process of trying to answer one question can lead to the discovery of new questions and new knowledge.

Is it possible to have too many questions in science?

While having more questions than answers is important in science, it is possible to have too many questions. It's important for scientists to prioritize and focus on the most important questions in their field in order to make progress and avoid getting overwhelmed by the sheer number of questions that can arise.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
73
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
603
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
54
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
265
Back
Top