Convergence of Riemann Sums for Limit of Series

In summary: Thanks.Ah, I understand the confusion. In the integral, the limit is taken as n goes to infinity, so the interval of integration is from 0 to 1. In the summation, the limit is taken as i goes to infinity, hence the limit of the summation is from 1 to n.
  • #1
springo
126
0

Homework Statement


I need to find the following:
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(\frac{1^2+2^2+3^2+...+n^2}{n^3} \right)[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I know I could do the sum of the series to find the result but I would like to use Riemann sums.
I think I have to start by writing the limit as:
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{n}\left(\frac{k}{n} \right)^2[/tex]
However, I'm not sure how to continue.

Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
12 + 22 + 32 + ... + n2 = [n(n+1)(2n+1)]/6
 
  • #3
The thing with Riemann sums is that they are related to the Riemann integral through the equation

[tex]\lim_{\max\{\Delta x_i\}\rightarrow 0}\sum_{i=1}^n f(x_i^*)\Delta x_i=\int_a^bf(x)dx[/tex]

This means that for a bounded integrable function f:[a,b]-->R and any sequence [itex]\{\mathcal{P}_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}[/itex] of partitions of [a,b] such that the largest subinterval in [itex]\mathcal{P}_n=\{a=x_0^{(n)}, x_1^{(n)},\ldots,x_N_n^{(n)}=b\}[/itex] goes to zero as [itex]n\rightarrow\infty[/itex], the sequence of associated Riemann sums approaches the integral of f over [a,b]:

[tex]\left(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left[\max_{1\leq i\leq N_n}(\Delta x_i^{(n)})\right]= 0 \right)\Longrightarrow \left(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{i=1}^{N_n}f(x_i^*)\Delta x_i^{(n)} = \int_a^bf(x)dx\right)[/tex]

So...

What we have here is the limit

[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{1}{n} \left(\frac{i}{n} \right)^2[/tex]

Notice that for each positive integer n, {0=0/n, 1/n, 2/n ...,(n-1)/n, n/n=1} is a partition of the interval [0,1] and in such a partition, each subinterval has length 1/n. And [itex]1/n\rightarrow 0[/itex] as [itex]n\rightarrow\infty[/itex], so according to the big implication above,

[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{i=1}^{n}f(x_i^*)\frac{1}{n} = \int_0^1f(x)dx[/tex]

for any bounded integrable function f:[0,1]-->R.

Now, for which function f and choice of [itex]x_i^*\in [(i-1)/n,i/n][/itex] do we have

[tex]f(x_i^*)=\left(\frac{i}{n}\right)^2[/tex]

??

Once you figure that out, you can use the fundamental theorem of calculus to find the value of the integral of f and hence the value of the sum you're interested in.
 
  • #4
OK, so if I understood well x ∈ [0,1] since 1/n is creating partitions of that interval.

Then we have xi* ∈ [xi-1, xi].
Since xi - xi-1 = i/n we have xi* = i/n.
Therefore f(x) = x2.

Then:
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(\frac{1^2+2^2+3^2+. ..+n^2}{n^3} \right) = \int_0^1 x^2 dx = \frac{1}{3}[/tex]
I checked the result and it's correct, what about the proof?

Thanks again.
 
  • #5
springo said:
OK, so if I understood well x ∈ [0,1] since 1/n is creating partitions of that interval.

Then we have xi* ∈ [xi-1, xi].
Since xi - xi-1 = i/n we have xi* = i/n.
Therefore f(x) = x2.

Then:
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(\frac{1^2+2^2+3^2+. ..+n^2}{n^3} \right) = \int_0^1 x^2 dx = \frac{1}{3}[/tex]
I checked the result and it's correct, what about the proof?

Thanks again.

I'm not sure I agree with your chain of implications from a logical standpoint but you're the one who's best placed to say if you understand or not.

And what do you mean by "what about the proof"?

In any case, the way I would have solved the problem is simply by noting that, in view of what has been say above, the sums

[tex]\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{1}{n} \left(\frac{i}{n} \right)^2[/tex]

are Riemann sums of the function f:[0,1]-->R defined by f(x)=x² where the points [itex]x_i^*\in [x_{i-1},x_i]=[(i-1)/n,i/n][/itex] have been chosen equal to i/n.

Hence,

[tex]
\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{1}{n} \left(\frac{i}{n} \right)^2 =\int_0^1x^2dx=1/3[/tex]
 
  • #6
By the "proof" I meant the fact that the function is f(x) = x2. But now I realize I made a mistake since xi - xi-1 = 1/n ≠ i/n.
So I don't understand how do you know the function is f(x) = x2?
Is it because xi* = i/n, and if so, how can you find that?
Thanks.
 
  • #7
You do not know a priori that xi* = i/n.

Suppose more generally that you are given the sum following Riemann sum

[tex]\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{1}{n}F(i,n) \right)[/tex]

where F(i,n) is some expression involving i and n.

The question is,

"For which function f:[0,1]-->R and which choice of points [itex]x_i^*\in [(i-1)/n,i/n][/itex] do we have [itex]f(x_i^*)=F(i,n)[/itex] for all i=0,...,n ??"

In the present case, F(i,n)=(i/n)² and so after a moment of reflection trying various combinations of functions and points [itex]x_i^*[/itex], you will conclude that f(x)=x² and [itex]x_i^*=i/n[/itex] does the trick.
 
  • #8
Thanks, I think I understood.

So would this be correct so far?
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{n^2+n}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{n^2+2n}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n^2+3n}}+...+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n^2+nn}} \right) = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{n+i}} = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}f(x_i^*)=\int_{0}^{\infty}f(x)dx[/tex]

With [itex]x_i^*\in[(i-1)/\sqrt{n}, i/\sqrt{n}][/itex].
I thought the interval is [0, ∞) since for each n, we have {0, 1/√n, 2/√n, ..., n/√n} a partition of [0, ∞), is that right?
Now I would need to find xi* and f just by guessing?
 
  • #9
The theorem concerns linking Riemann sum and integral concerns definite integrals. [0,∞) is not a valid interval.

But

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{n^2+in}}=\frac{1}{n}\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+i/n}}[/tex]
 
  • #10
OK, now it all makes sense :)
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{n^2+ n}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{n^2+2n}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n^2+3n}}+...+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n^2+nn}} \right) = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{1}{n}\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\frac{i}{n}}} =\int_{0}^{1}\frac{dx}{\sqrt{1+x}}=\left[ 2\sqrt{1+x}\right]_0^1=2\sqrt{2}-2[/tex]
 
  • #11
Well done.
 
  • #12
I don't mean to hijack this thread, but I have a question for quasar.

In this step right here: [tex] \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{1}{n} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\frac{i}{n}}} =\int_{0}^{1}\frac{dx}{\sqrt{1+x}}=\left[ 2\sqrt{1+x}\right]_0^1[/tex],

Is the integral from 0 to 1 because in the summation, when i = 1 then the term 1/n = 1 and as i tends to infinity, the term 1/n will tend to 0?
 
  • #13
The integral is from 0 to 1 because i/n is some point taken from the subinterval [(i-1)/n, i/n] of the partition {0, 1/n, 2/n, ..., n/n=1} of [0,1]. It's all explained in post #3.
 

What is the Riemann Integral and how is it related to limits?

The Riemann Integral is a mathematical concept used to calculate the area under a curve. It is closely related to limits, as the Riemann Integral can be thought of as a limit of a series of approximations of the area under the curve.

How is the Riemann Integral used to evaluate limits?

The Riemann Integral can be used to evaluate limits by breaking down a function into smaller intervals and calculating the area under each interval. As the intervals become smaller, the approximation of the area becomes more accurate, and the limit can be found.

What are the different types of Riemann Integrals?

There are three types of Riemann Integrals: left Riemann Integral, right Riemann Integral, and middle Riemann Integral. These types differ in how they approximate the area under the curve and can lead to different values for the integral and limit.

What are the assumptions and limitations of using Riemann Integrals to evaluate limits?

The main assumption is that the function being integrated is continuous on the given interval. Additionally, the Riemann Integral may not exist if the function has an infinite discontinuity or if the intervals are not small enough to accurately approximate the area under the curve.

Can Riemann Integrals be used to find limits of functions with more than one variable?

Yes, Riemann Integrals can be used to evaluate limits of functions with multiple variables. This is known as a multiple integral, where the area under the function is calculated in multiple dimensions. However, the process of evaluating these types of integrals can be more complex.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
594
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
466
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
651
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
402
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
703
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
194
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
232
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
170
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
476
Back
Top