What kind of energy is released when matter and antimatter collide?

In summary, ultra high-energy cosmic rays are not likely the result of matter-antimatter collisions because cosmic rays have much higher energies than what can be produced from such collisions. Additionally, cosmic rays are mostly composed of protons and not pions, which would be the result of matter-antimatter annihilation. The energy released from matter-antimatter annihilation is also relatively low compared to the incredibly high energies of cosmic rays. Therefore, it is unlikely that matter-antimatter collisions are responsible for ultra high-energy cosmic rays.
  • #1
ensabah6
695
0
Could ultra high-energy cosmic rays be the result of matter-antimatter collision?

What would be a unique antimatter-matter anihilation signature should say a 10 gram rock of antimatter were to collide into a meteor?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think cosmic rays are too energetic to be formed in such a manner.

See for instance http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/topics/snr_group/cosmic_rays.html

10^21 electron volts!

Matter-antimatter annhilation will yield most of the energy in pions, some charged, some uncharged. You'll get much lower energies, I'm sure (a proton mass is only 1 Gev which is an upper limit). Cosmic rays can have about 12 orders of magnitude more energy than this.

Cosmic rays are nuclei, protons, or electrons (see above), apparently mostly protons (from the above URL) and not pions. There will also be some x-rays in matter-antimatter annhilation from the electron-positron annhiliation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
pervect said:
I think cosmic rays are too energetic to be formed in such a manner.

See for instance http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/topics/snr_group/cosmic_rays.html

10^21 electron volts!

Matter-antimatter annhilation will yield most of the energy in pions, some charged, some uncharged. You'll get much lower energies, I'm sure (a proton mass is only 1 Gev which is an upper limit). Cosmic rays can have about 12 orders of magnitude more energy than this.

Cosmic rays are nuclei, protons, or electrons (see above), apparently mostly protons (from the above URL) and not pions. There will also be some x-rays in matter-antimatter annhilation from the electron-positron annhiliation.

I was thinking along the lines of say 1 kg of antimatter colliding with say 500g of matter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
pervect said:
10^21 electron volts!

To put that in perspective that is ~100 Joules, roughly the energy of a baseball traveling at 120 km/h (or ~ 80 Miles/hr)

Remember that this thing is probably a proton or something of similar mass. It's just mind blowing :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #5
ensabah6 said:
I was thinking along the lines of say 1 kg of antimatter colliding with say 500g of matter.

But each annihilation event is from one subatomic matter particle meeting one subatomic anti-matter particle giving of a number of high energy particles as a result. The more matter and anti-matter particle you annihilate the more high energy particles you produce, but they won't have any more energy.
 

1. What are ultra high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs)?

UHECRs are highly energetic particles that originate from outside our solar system. They can have energies up to 10^20 electron volts, which is millions of times more energetic than particles produced in particle accelerators on Earth.

2. How are UHECRs formed?

There are several theories on the formation of UHECRs, but one possibility is that they are the result of matter-antimatter collisions in the distant universe. In this scenario, when a matter particle and an antimatter particle collide, they annihilate each other, releasing a burst of energy in the form of UHECRs.

3. How do scientists detect UHECRs?

UHECRs are detected through the use of large-scale detectors, such as the Pierre Auger Observatory. These detectors use a combination of surface and fluorescence detectors to measure the properties of the particles and determine their direction of origin.

4. Why is the matter-antimatter collision hypothesis a plausible explanation for UHECRs?

The matter-antimatter collision hypothesis is plausible because it can account for the high energies of UHECRs. When matter and antimatter particles collide, they release a large amount of energy, which could explain the observed energies of UHECRs. Additionally, the distribution and directionality of UHECRs in the universe aligns with what would be expected from matter-antimatter collisions.

5. Are there any other possible explanations for UHECRs?

Yes, there are other theories for the origin of UHECRs, including shock acceleration in astrophysical objects like supernovae and active galactic nuclei. However, the matter-antimatter collision hypothesis remains a strong contender and is supported by observational data.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
755
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top