Competing for Consumption: Pascal & Friedman in Exchange Economy

  • Thread starter Dostre
  • Start date
In summary, there are two agents, Pascal and Friedman, in a pure exchange economy with two goods and no free disposal. Pascal's utility function is given by $u^P(x_1^P,x_2^P)=a\ln (x_1^P)+(1-a)\ln(x_2^P-bx_2^F)$ while Friedman's utility function is $u^F(x_1^F,x_2^F)=a\ln (x_1^F)+(1-a)\ln(x_2^F-bx_2^p)$. Both agents have preferences for good 2 of the other agent. Pascal's endowment is $\vec{w} ^P=(w_
  • #1
Dostre
26
0
Consider two agents (Pascal and Friedman) in a pure exchange economy with two goods and no free disposal. Pascal has a preference relation give by the utility function

$$u^P(x_1^P,x_2^P)=a\ln (x_1^P)+(1-a)\ln(x_2^P-bx_2^F)$$

while Friedman's preferences are

$$u^F(x_1^F,x_2^F)=a\ln (x_1^F)+(1-a)\ln(x_2^F-bx_2^p)$$

Here 0<a<1 and 0<b<1. Additionally the consumption of good 2 of one agent enters in the utility of the other agent.
Pascal's endownment is $$\vec{w} ^P=(w_1,w_2)\geq 0$$ while Friedman's is $$\vec{w} ^F=(y_1,y_2)\geq 0$$ Let P be the price of good two in terms of good one.

1. Compute each other's demands of these goods.
2. Find the competitive equilibrium price and allocations.
3. How are the equilibrium price and consumption allocations affected by he parameter b?

Attempt: First of all this should hold (market clearing): $$x_1^P+px_2^P=w_1^P+pw_2^P$$
I think I should start with forming the Lagrangian. How will it look? Then, once the Langrangian is formed what am I solving for? Any hints please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
All types of homework or homework-like problems should be posted in the appropriate homework forum please.
 

1. What is the main concept behind "Competing for Consumption: Pascal & Friedman in Exchange Economy"?

The main concept behind "Competing for Consumption: Pascal & Friedman in Exchange Economy" is the idea of competition between individuals in a market economy, as described by economists Blaise Pascal and Milton Friedman. They both propose that individuals are motivated by self-interest and will compete for resources in order to satisfy their own consumption needs.

2. How do Pascal and Friedman's theories differ from each other?

Pascal's theory focuses on the psychological aspect of competition, suggesting that individuals are driven by envy and the desire to possess what others have. On the other hand, Friedman's theory is based on the concept of rational self-interest, where individuals make decisions based on what will bring them the most benefit.

3. How does this concept relate to modern consumerism?

The concept of competition for consumption is highly relevant to modern consumerism, as it reflects the constant drive for individuals to acquire more material possessions and compete with others in terms of social status and wealth. This can be seen in the rise of social media and the pressure to present a certain image to others.

4. What are some potential negative effects of competition for consumption?

Competition for consumption can lead to excessive materialism, where individuals place too much value on material possessions and neglect other aspects of their lives such as relationships and personal growth. It can also contribute to inequality and social divisions, as those who are unable to keep up with the competition may feel inferior and marginalized.

5. How can society address the negative impacts of competition for consumption?

Society can address the negative impacts of competition for consumption by promoting values such as contentment and gratitude, rather than constantly striving for more. Education and awareness about the negative effects of excessive consumerism can also help individuals make more conscious and sustainable consumption choices. Additionally, policies and regulations that promote social and economic equality can help mitigate the negative impacts of competition for consumption.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
93
Views
10K
  • General Math
4
Replies
125
Views
16K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
6
Replies
175
Views
20K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
5
Replies
150
Views
15K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
77
Views
10K
Back
Top