Some elements react with certain elements better than others ?

  • Thread starter LogicalAcid
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Elements
In summary: The reason that the bonds in an atom are less stable is that the electron pairs are farther apart than they would be in an atom with an open shell.
  • #1
LogicalAcid
137
0
Because let's say we have Hydrogen and Chlorine, they with both react very well with each other due to the reason that Hydrogen wants to get rid of its only Valence electron, to have an empty shell, and Cl needs only one more to have a full shell. Right?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
No.

HCl molecule is mostly covalent, and in HCl molecule they have both full valence shells. So in this case these full valance shells are the force behind.

Your explanation would work for ionic NaCl.
 
  • #3
It's more like the amount of energy released from having chlorine take the electron is greater that the amount of energy lost by having hydrogen lose it. If you use a table of standard reduction potentials, you'll find that the reaction
Cl2 + H2 --> 2H+ + 2Cl-
has a Delta G value of -262 kJ, which means 262 kJ of energy is released for each mole of Cl2 which reacts.

Of course H+-cations are not stable in solution and would bind, for example to a water molecule, to form H3O+.
 
  • #4
Borek said:
No.

HCl molecule is mostly covalent, and in HCl molecule they have both full valence shells. So in this case these full valance shells are the force behind.

Your explanation would work for ionic NaCl.

H gave its one electron to Cl which only needed one, now they are both ions, how is this not an ionic bond?
 
  • #5
espen180 said:
It's more like the amount of energy released from having chlorine take the electron is greater that the amount of energy lost by having hydrogen lose it. If you use a table of standard reduction potentials, you'll find that the reaction
Cl2 + H2 --> 2H+ + 2Cl-
has a Delta G value of -262 kJ, which means 262 kJ of energy is released for each mole of Cl2 which reacts.

Of course H+-cations are not stable in solution and would bind, for example to a water molecule, to form H3O+.
A single H+ proton is considered an atom of H?
 
  • #6
LogicalAcid said:
H gave its one electron to Cl which only needed one, now they are both ions, how is this not an ionic bond?

No, as long as HCl is not dissociated in water they share two electrons. HCl is not a good example here, as it doesn't follow the obvious trends.
 
  • #7
LogicalAcid said:
A single H+ proton is considered an atom of H?

No, it is not an ATOM, it is an ion (cation to be precise). But yes, single proton is considered to be a hydrogen cation.
 
  • #8
Borek said:
No, it is not an ATOM, it is an ion (cation to be precise). But yes, single proton is considered to be a hydrogen cation.

OK I understand, HCl is covalently bonded when not disassociated in water, but back to the question. If two elements have the exact amount of electrons one needs to lose or gain to have a full shell, they react better than ones that don't have the exact amount of electrons for both of them to have a full shell?
 
  • #9
LogicalAcid said:
OK I understand, HCl is covalently bonded when not disassociated in water, but back to the question. If two elements have the exact amount of electrons one needs to lose or gain to have a full shell, they react better than ones that don't have the exact amount of electrons for both of them to have a full shell?

No, the fact that you seldomly observe a system with open shells is not that the bonds in it are less stable (or "do not form so well in a reaction" to use your diction) but that it usually will react to form even more complex compounds.
 

What are elements?

Elements are the basic building blocks of matter. They are pure substances that cannot be broken down into simpler substances by ordinary chemical reactions.

How do elements react with each other?

Elements can react with each other to form compounds through chemical reactions. This occurs when the outermost electrons of one element interact with the outermost electrons of another element, resulting in a rearrangement of atoms to form new substances.

Why do some elements react with certain elements better than others?

This is due to the electronic structure of the elements. Elements with similar electronic structures tend to react more easily with each other, while elements with very different electronic structures may not interact as readily.

Which elements react with each other the best?

There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on the specific elements and conditions involved. Generally, elements in the same group on the periodic table tend to react more easily with each other.

What factors influence the reactivity of elements?

The reactivity of elements can be influenced by a variety of factors, including their electronic structure, atomic size, and electronegativity. The presence of a catalyst can also greatly affect the rate of a chemical reaction between elements.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
973
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Chemistry
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
20K
  • Chemistry
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top