Finding the Right Grad School for Materials Science/EE: Advice Needed

In summary, the applicant is having trouble deciding how to round-out their graduate school selection and is looking for advice. They are particularly interested in programs with cleanroom access, industry ties, and research funding.
  • #1
Clockward
19
0
I am in the process of applying to PhD programs in Materials Science, and I am having trouble deciding how to round-out my selection of graduate schools. I have been working very hard this semester to prepare graduate application materials and investigate programs in which I would be comfortable spending four or more years, but the process is pretty overwhelming when combined with the my course load. I would really appreciate some advice before December rolls around, so that I have time to pursue other universities that would not simply reject me out of hand. I am facing a bit of an uphill battle in moving from Physics/Applied Math to Materials Science or Electrical Engineering, so I can't reach too far at this stage.

I am applying to Penn State's Materials Science program, University of Washington's Materials Science and Electrical Engineering departments, and University of British Columbia's Materials Engineering and Electrical Engineering departments. My strongest bet is currently Penn State because I worked there last summer for my REU and made some good connections, but I would prefer to live somewhere other than State College PA for 4-6 years.

Personal Profile:
Interests: electronic materials, MEMS devices, sensors, metamaterials, modeling materials computationally, analytical math modeling. I want to work in industry and found a startup someday.
I am interested in graduate programs with cleanroom access, industry ties, and efforts to fund nanotechnology. I am also looking for overlap between electrical engineering and materials science programs.
I really want to live in or within short driving distance of a coastal big city, such as Seattle or Vancouver. I would decide on a grad school based on this issue, ie no midwestern locations.

Academic profile:
School: Humboldt State University (small liberal arts, biology, and environmental engineering focused CSU in northern California).
Majors: Physics and Applied Mathematics double major. I am taking most of my upper division physics in the last three semesters, so about five of my classes will not be taken before I finish applying. This includes quantum physics, the closest class my university offers to solid state physics.
Year: Currently a fifth year senior who will graduate this Spring.
Total GPA: 3.87, Major GPA: about 3.85 i think.
GRE: September 2008 was 620v/720q/4.5aw, November 2009 was 550v/770q/?aw (haven't gotten the official report yet).
Research Experience: REU at Penn State in summer of 2009, in materials science (nanowire characterization).
Publications: I am the last author (before the advisers) in a paper being published in Nano Letters this month, based on my work this summer.
Letters of Rec: One from a Physics professor, one from an Applied Math professor, and one from my Penn State adviser. She is a prolific publisher who most likely carriers some weight as a recommender, although I do not know how strong of a letter she will write.

Thank you in advance.

P.S. If I were to obtain a masters degree at Penn State or a similar tier school, while producing good research and earning excellent grades/recommendations, then would my chances of entering a PhD program at a top-10 university be decent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


EDIT: I just realized that I flubbed the title of this thread. I hope that isn't discouraging people from taking me seriously.

I should add that I have already asked my advisers and peers about graduate school and PhD work in materials science. I am just seeking some alternative views on the subject from people who know the field or have experience rating potential PhD applicants. To people in that position: how do committees look on people who spend a year between undergrad and grad school on topics unrelated to engineering or science? Is that an automatic demerit, even if the applicant was independently researching their field and trying to improve their knowledge base and narrow down their proposed area of research?
 
Last edited:
  • #3


Update:

My paper has been published online, and I am rewriting my CV to make note of this.

I have also decided to focus on these programs (and have sent GRE score reports out already):

Penn State (Materials Science)
University of Washington (Materials Science)
University of Washington (Electrical engineering)
Cornell (Materials Science)
Carnegie Mellon (Materials Science)
University of Pennsylvania (Materials Science)
UC Berkeley (Materials Science)
University of British Columbia (Materials Engineering Masters)

Are these schools too far of a reach? It costs about $100 per school to send the GRE scores and fill out an application, and I am trying to rationalize hundreds of dollars being spent on potentially fruitless applications. I hope someone here has more perspective on this chase than I do. I can provide class information is that would help.
 

1. What factors should I consider when choosing a graduate program in materials science or electrical engineering?

There are several important factors to consider when choosing a graduate program in these fields. Some key considerations include the program's reputation and accreditation, the faculty and their areas of research, the available resources and facilities, the location and cost of the program, and the career opportunities and networking potential.

2. How important is the school's ranking for graduate programs in materials science or electrical engineering?

While a higher ranking can indicate a strong program, it should not be the only factor in your decision. It's important to also consider the program's specific strengths and how well they align with your research interests and career goals. Additionally, a lower ranked program may still offer valuable research opportunities and connections in the field.

3. Should I choose a specialized program or a more general one?

This ultimately depends on your career goals and research interests. If you have a specific area of materials science or electrical engineering that you want to focus on, a specialized program may be a better fit. However, a more general program can also provide a broad foundation and allow for more flexibility in your research and career path.

4. How can I learn more about the research opportunities and facilities at a graduate program?

You can start by researching the faculty and their areas of expertise, as well as the program's website and any available brochures or informational materials. Additionally, you can reach out to current graduate students or alumni to get their insights and experiences with the program.

5. What should I do if I am having trouble deciding between multiple graduate programs?

If you are struggling to choose between multiple graduate programs, consider creating a pros and cons list for each program, reaching out to current students or alumni for their perspectives, and discussing your options with a mentor or advisor. It's also important to trust your instincts and choose the program that feels like the best fit for you and your goals.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
914
Replies
7
Views
785
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
572
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
918
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
959
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
28
Views
2K
Back
Top