|Mar6-12, 08:41 PM||#1|
Quick P. Energy Derivation Question
When deriving the work-potential energy theorem, my book states that dV (derivative of the potential energy) is equal to the negative of Fdr without a corresponding explanation. What is the justification behind the negative sign?
physics news on PhysOrg.com
>> Promising doped zirconia
>> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease
>> Bringing life into focus
|Mar6-12, 09:06 PM||#2|
As such,there is no explanation,its about definition.
The important thing is,for conservative forces,you can define a potential.Even if you had define dV=Fdr,you would have a consistent theory.The fact that dV=-Fdr,and not Fdr,is not logic,its convention.
In essence,it means that,when positive work is done by the field forces on body,its potential energy decreases,and kinetic energy increases.
|Similar Threads for: Quick P. Energy Derivation Question|
|Just a quick question on the derivation of energy||Special & General Relativity||2|
|Gravitational Potential Energy Derivation question?||Introductory Physics Homework||7|
|Silly question, derivation of energy||Classical Physics||4|
|Quick derivation question||Introductory Physics Homework||0|
|Quick Hello Then Question About Energy||Introductory Physics Homework||1|