| New Reply |
Quick P. Energy Derivation Question |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar6-12, 08:41 PM | #1 |
|
|
Quick P. Energy Derivation Question
When deriving the work-potential energy theorem, my book states that dV (derivative of the potential energy) is equal to the negative of Fdr without a corresponding explanation. What is the justification behind the negative sign?
|
| PhysOrg.com |
physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Promising doped zirconia >> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease >> Bringing life into focus |
| Mar6-12, 09:06 PM | #2 |
|
|
As such,there is no explanation,its about definition.
The important thing is,for conservative forces,you can define a potential.Even if you had define dV=Fdr,you would have a consistent theory.The fact that dV=-Fdr,and not Fdr,is not logic,its convention. In essence,it means that,when positive work is done by the field forces on body,its potential energy decreases,and kinetic energy increases. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Quick P. Energy Derivation Question
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Just a quick question on the derivation of energy | Special & General Relativity | 2 | ||
| Gravitational Potential Energy Derivation question? | Introductory Physics Homework | 7 | ||
| Silly question, derivation of energy | Classical Physics | 4 | ||
| Quick derivation question | Introductory Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| Quick Hello Then Question About Energy | Introductory Physics Homework | 1 | ||