## Are my postulates true regarding circles?

If we know the exact radius of a circle, then we can't have an exact circumference, and if we know the exact circumference, then we can't know the exact radius.

If these postulates are true, then I realize that this idea is not original but probably known since B.C.
 PhysOrg.com mathematics news on PhysOrg.com >> Pendulum swings back on 350-year-old mathematical mystery>> Bayesian statistics theorem holds its own - but use with caution>> Math technique de-clutters cancer-cell data, revealing tumor evolution, treatment leads
 Recognitions: Gold Member Exact isn't the right word to use. If I have a circle with diameter 1, I know that the circumference is exactly ##\pi##, I just can't represent ##\pi## by a finite decimal sequence. However you are right in your idea, a circle cannot simultaneously have a rational circumference and a rational radius.

 Similar discussions for: Are my postulates true regarding circles? Thread Forum Replies Differential Geometry 8 Quantum Physics 29 Special & General Relativity 7 Special & General Relativity 7 Special & General Relativity 5