New Reply

Are my postulates true regarding circles?

 
Share Thread
Nov8-12, 03:03 PM   #1
 

Are my postulates true regarding circles?


If we know the exact radius of a circle, then we can't have an exact circumference, and if we know the exact circumference, then we can't know the exact radius.

If these postulates are true, then I realize that this idea is not original but probably known since B.C.
PhysOrg.com mathematics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Pendulum swings back on 350-year-old mathematical mystery
>> Bayesian statistics theorem holds its own - but use with caution
>> Math technique de-clutters cancer-cell data, revealing tumor evolution, treatment leads
Nov8-12, 03:38 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Exact isn't the right word to use. If I have a circle with diameter 1, I know that the circumference is exactly ##\pi##, I just can't represent ##\pi## by a finite decimal sequence.

However you are right in your idea, a circle cannot simultaneously have a rational circumference and a rational radius.
New Reply

Similar discussions for: Are my postulates true regarding circles?
Thread Forum Replies
How to place circles that there will be no gap. Use least number of circles possible. Differential Geometry 8
what are the postulates of QFT? Quantum Physics 29
SR postulates Special & General Relativity 7
1st & 2nd Postulates Special & General Relativity 7
GR postulates Special & General Relativity 5