Train gets struck by lightning

In summary: Let's assume the observer is either in front of the train or behind the train.At the very least it'll give an upper bound for the time interval an observer in the train will observe. That's an interesting point. You are not told the the relative proximities of the observers to the two ends of the train. This means you do not have enough information to answer the question. If you assume the two observers are effectively at the same point (when?) then just considering the speed of light will again say it's simultaneous, and you will need to consider relativity to get a definitive answer.
  • #1
bfusco
128
1

Homework Statement


A train with proper length of 200m is traveling at the speed of 120km/hr. An observer on the ground sees two lightning striking the two ends of the train at exactly the same time. What the time interval of the lightning strikes observed by the observer on the train?

The Attempt at a Solution


in this class we are currently going through special relativity, however for this question the speed of the train is so slow compared to the speed of light i feel as though i can approach it classically.

this idea of special relativity is sort of new for me so if someone understands what the teacher is trying to get at with this question and wouldn't mind pushing my thought process in the correct direction i would greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you treat it classically then you'll obviously get the answer 0. I doubt that's what's wanted.
 
  • #3
right, that's where my thoughts keep taking me, but logic dictates that that's not what the teacher wants. lol
 
  • #4
bfusco said:

Homework Statement


A train with proper length of 200m is traveling at the speed of 120km/hr. An observer on the ground sees two lightning striking the two ends of the train at exactly the same time. What the time interval of the lightning strikes observed by the observer on the train?

The Attempt at a Solution


in this class we are currently going through special relativity, however for this question the speed of the train is so slow compared to the speed of light i feel as though i can approach it classically.

this idea of special relativity is sort of new for me so if someone understands what the teacher is trying to get at with this question and wouldn't mind pushing my thought process in the correct direction i would greatly appreciate it.

Hi bfusco! :smile:

How about taking into account that the speed of light is finite?
No need to worry about time dilations and length contractions, but how about plain old classical speed?
 
  • #5
I like Serena said:
Hi bfusco! :smile:

How about taking into account that the speed of light is finite?
No need to worry about time dilations and length contractions, but how about plain old classical speed?
That's an interesting point. You are not told the the relative proximities of the observers to the two ends of the train. This means you do not have enough information to answer the question. If you assume the two observers are effectively at the same point (when?) then just considering the speed of light will again say it's simultaneous, and you will need to consider relativity to get a definitive answer.
 
  • #6
haruspex said:
That's an interesting point. You are not told the the relative proximities of the observers to the two ends of the train. This means you do not have enough information to answer the question. If you assume the two observers are effectively at the same point (when?) then just considering the speed of light will again say it's simultaneous, and you will need to consider relativity to get a definitive answer.

Let's assume the observer is either in front of the train or behind the train.
At the very least it'll give an upper bound for the time interval an observer in the train will observe.

It will only be simultaneous for both observers (without relativity) if the observers are in the same position relative to the direction of the train.
 
  • #7
I like Serena said:
Let's assume the observer is either in front of the train or behind the train.
I see no justification for that. You'd also have to assume a position for the observer on the train. If the person on the train is up front and the observer on the ground is somewhere in front of the train you're back to simultaneity in the classical view.
 
  • #8
well the way i am thinking is that since the train is moving with a velocity of 120km/h towards say the right, the light from the bolt behind needs to travel that extra distance covered to reach the train observer. i just have a problem representing that mathematically.

i want to say that the light from behind needs to travel the proper length of the train "L" plus that traveled distance "l" to get a total distance "S", S=L+l (1). however "l" is equal to the velocity of the train times the time it took for the light to cover a distance "l", l=vt (2), plugging the "l" into the first equation you get S=L+vt (3).

the next part would be to solve for that "t". this is where I am getting a little messed up. since l=120(km/h)*t, and the time for light to travel that distance is t'=l/c,...would i have to use the Lorentz transformation here?
 
  • #9
bfusco said:
well the way i am thinking is that since the train is moving with a velocity of 120km/h towards say the right, the light from the bolt behind needs to travel that extra distance covered to reach the train observer. i just have a problem representing that mathematically.

i want to say that the light from behind needs to travel the proper length of the train "L" plus that traveled distance "l" to get a total distance "S", S=L+l (1). however "l" is equal to the velocity of the train times the time it took for the light to cover a distance "l", l=vt (2), plugging the "l" into the first equation you get S=L+vt (3).

the next part would be to solve for that "t". this is where I am getting a little messed up. since l=120(km/h)*t, and the time for light to travel that distance is t'=l/c,...would i have to use the Lorentz transformation here?

Let's ignore the speed of the train for now, since it is negligible (by a factor of ##10^7##) relative to the speed of light.
Any effect by the theory of relativity will be astronomically less than all "normal" effects.
The difference in time between the lightning strikes for an observer behind the train is the length of the train divided by the speed of light.
 
  • #10
bfusco said:
i want to say that the light from behind needs to travel the proper length of the train "L" plus that traveled distance "l" to get a total distance "S", S=L+l (1). however "l" is equal to the velocity of the train times the time it took for the light to cover a distance "l", l=vt (2), plugging the "l" into the first equation you get S=L+vt (3).

the next part would be to solve for that "t". this is where I am getting a little messed up. since l=120(km/h)*t, and the time for light to travel that distance is t'=l/c,...would i have to use the Lorentz transformation here?

also, upon thinking about it more, to calculate the difference in time the observer on the train records i have to take into account that the light from the right, or in front of him travels a lesser distance. and it still would depend on that distance "l", except now that total distance traveled from the light ahead of the train observer would be say W=L-l
 
  • #11
I like Serena said:
Let's ignore the speed of the train for now, since it is negligible (by a factor of ##10^7##) relative to the speed of light.
The difference in time between the lightning strikes for an observer behind the train is the length of the train divided by the speed of light.

im starting to get confused about the location of the people. just to be clear I am picturing this event like this: there is a person standing in the center of the length of the train on the roof. so on the roof, 100m to the left is the end of the train, 100m to the right is front of train. the person off to the side of the tracks is also standing in the center of that 200m's when the lightning strikes. is this in agreement with everyone else?
 
  • #12
bfusco said:
im starting to get confused about the location of the people. just to be clear I am picturing this event like this: there is a person standing in the center of the length of the train on the roof. so on the roof, 100m to the left is the end of the train, 100m to the right is front of train. the person off to the side of the tracks is also standing in the center of that 200m's when the lightning strikes. is this in agreement with everyone else?

If that is the case, then both observers will see the lightning strikes at exactly the same time (ignoring relativity which really has a negligible effect at this speed).

I'd go for an observer behind the train and an observer in the middle of the train.

But we might as well also consider the case of an observer behind the train and an observer at the front end of the train.
That would represent the scenario where the difference in time would be greatest.
 
  • #13
I like Serena said:
If that is the case, then both observers will see the lightning strikes at exactly the same time (ignoring relativity which really has a negligible effect at this speed).

I'd go for an observer behind the train and an observer in the middle of the train.

But we might as well also consider the case of an observer behind the train and an observer at the front end of the train.
That would represent the scenario where the difference in time would be greatest.

for the stationary observer, which is the one I am assuming is behind the train, there would be a time difference between the two lightning strikes because the strike on the front of the train would have to travel an additional 200m to get to him. if there is an observer behind the train than the initial conditions of the problem need to be corrected, the only way an observer in a non-moving inertial frame can experience 2 lights flashing from different locations at the same time is if he is equal distances away.
 
  • #14
bfusco said:
for the stationary observer, which is the one I am assuming is behind the train, there would be a time difference between the two lightning strikes because the strike on the front of the train would have to travel an additional 200m to get to him. if there is an observer behind the train than the initial conditions of the problem need to be corrected, the only way an observer in a non-moving inertial frame can experience 2 lights flashing from different locations at the same time is if he is equal distances away.

If an observer behind the train sees the 2 flashes at the same time, that means that the flash at the front of the train occurred first.
You should be able to calculate how much later the second flash at the end of the train came...

Btw, I'm afraid there is no such thing as a non-moving inertial frame.
It is impossible to decide what non-moving is, except by defining a specific frame as non-moving.
Did you want to define the Earth frame as non-moving?
 
  • #15
I like Serena said:
Btw, I'm afraid there is no such thing as a non-moving inertial frame.
It is impossible to decide what non-moving is, except by defining a specific frame as non-moving.
Did you want to define the Earth frame as non-moving?

well i thought generally the Earth frame is considered non-moving, and i felt is was implied by the stating the train is traveling 120km/h. however, since you mentioned it i now see what you meant by the observer behind and in front of the train and now i am more confused. if we are to include that possibility i am lost as to where to begin this problem.
 
  • #16
bfusco said:
well i thought generally the Earth frame is considered non-moving, and i felt is was implied by the stating the train is traveling 120km/h. however, since you mentioned it i now see what you meant by the observer behind and in front of the train and now i am more confused. if we are to include that possibility i am lost as to where to begin this problem.

Yeah, I guess you'd define the earth-frame as non-moving.

So can you answer the question how much time passes between the first and second strike if an observer behind the train observes them at the same time?
 
  • #17
In retrospect I'm starting to wonder.
You are so persistent in putting both observers in the same place.
And you are so eager to apply the Lorentz transformation.
It suggests that you are supposed to use it and to make that assumption.
 
  • #18
Yeah, I guess you'd define the earth-frame as non-moving.

I like Serena said:
So can you answer the question how much time passes between the first and second strike if an observer behind the train observes them at the same time?

i think so...taking into account the height of the train "h" and the distance between the observer and the train to be "x", i would say the time it takes for the closer lightning strike to reach the observer behind the train would be t1=[sq.rt(x^2+h^2)]/c. the time t2, for the further lightning strike to reach the observer would be ("L" being the length of the train), t2=[sq.rt((x+L)^2+h^2)]/c, so the difference in time for the ground observer behind the train would be Δt=t2-t1.

if we ignore the height of the train and assume all this happens at say eye level, t1=x/c and t2=(x+L)/c, and Δt=t2-t1
 
  • #19
I like Serena said:
In retrospect I'm starting to wonder.
You are so persistent in putting both observers in the same place.
And you are so eager to apply the Lorentz transformation.
It suggests that you are supposed to use it and to make that assumption.

i honestly am not sure really, the way i am doing the problem now is simply classical mechanics, and considering we are doing special relativity in class it seems strange that i wouldn't have to apply things i am learning in class. i acknowledge that this question seems a little vague. I am going to ask my prof. tomorrow to get a better idea. i appreciate your help, thanks.
 

What happens when a train gets struck by lightning?

When a train gets struck by lightning, the electrical energy from the lightning bolt travels through the metal exterior of the train and into the ground. This can cause damage to the train's electrical systems, and in rare cases, can cause injury or death to passengers or crew on board.

How often do trains get struck by lightning?

On average, trains are struck by lightning about once every 1,000,000 miles traveled. However, this can vary depending on the frequency and severity of thunderstorms in a particular area. The likelihood of a train getting struck by lightning can also be reduced by implementing lightning protection systems on trains.

Can passengers on a train feel the effects of a lightning strike?

In most cases, passengers on a train will not feel the effects of a lightning strike. This is because the electrical energy is conducted through the metal exterior of the train and into the ground. However, if the lightning strike causes damage to the train's electrical systems, it is possible for passengers to experience a power outage or other disruptions.

Can a train be protected from lightning strikes?

Yes, there are various measures that can be taken to protect trains from lightning strikes. These include installing lightning rods on the train's exterior, using grounding wires to divert the electrical energy, and implementing surge protection devices for the train's electrical systems. Regular maintenance and inspections can also help identify and address any potential vulnerabilities.

What should passengers do if a train is struck by lightning?

If a train is struck by lightning, passengers should remain calm and follow any instructions given by the train crew. In most cases, the train will continue on its journey after a brief delay. However, if there are any concerns about the train's safety, passengers may be asked to disembark and wait for further instructions from the train company.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
516
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
67
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
116
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top