# Charging a Fluid

by AkInfinity
Tags: charging, fluid
 P: 33 Hello friends, I am performing an experiment and need a charged fluid here are some questions I have, hopefully someone can help. Can I create a charged fluid by taking distilled water, then adding NaCl (positive and negative charges), and then immersing the positive end of a voltage generator (set it to 5kiloVolts) in the fluid while grounding the negative end to ground and "extract electrons from fluid" (i guess in this case Cl-)" to make it positive? If yes would it be better for me to ground the negative end of the voltage generator or not. If no is there another way I can generate a charged fluid easier? Secondly in order to maintain my fluid charged do i need to insulate it from air? Would it be easier to keep a positively charged fluid or negatively charged fluid? Just to clarify by positive fluid i mean it has a positive net charge, like if i had pure water and put Ca+ in it so that the fluid is positively charged. Thanks
 Sci Advisor PF Gold P: 1,111 Good luck with that! You will never be able to significantly charge a fluid.
 P: 33 Sup Claude, What if instead I place an extensive amount of NaCl in an extensive amount of water, then stick both proves of the voltage generator in thus the cl- will go to one end and na+ to the other. then separate the two in the middle so taht on one side i have ca+ (positive charge) and on the other -cl fluid, and then separate it. You guys think it will work then? I mean the body works wtih charged fluids out of neurons and in neurons.
PF Gold
P: 1,111

## Charging a Fluid

 Quote by AkInfinity What if instead I place an extensive amount of NaCl in an extensive amount of water, then stick both proves of the voltage generator in thus the cl- will go to one end and na+ to the other. then separate the two in the middle so taht on one side i have ca+ (positive charge) and on the other -cl fluid, and then separate it.
Won't work either. The problem is that while you do get a layer of ions around an electrode, you get also another layer of counter ions around that first layer, such that the overall polarization is small.

 Quote by AkInfinity I mean the body works wtih charged fluids out of neurons and in neurons.
This is out of my depth, but I would be that there are counter ions nearby.
 P: 371 Salt water is a conductor. Any conductor can be charged. But the charge always moves to the surface. So all the excess ions will be at the surface of the water or the sides of the container. However there may be a way to get some charge to stay dispersed throigh the water for a while if you use very pure water. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2845823/ Inside the body you have voltages across cell membranes. But the charge is not dispersed throughout the liquid. It's all at the surface of the membrane. The membrane in this case acts as a capacitor. The charge is created by ions passing through the membrane.
 P: 33 @DrClaude; Well here's what I'm thinking; If say one of your electrodes has positive charge and the other has negative charge it would only make sense that positive atoms and negative atoms would distribute untill for example the sodium "cancels" the negative field of the negative electrode so other sodiums are not attracted anymore. Thus if I am using very high voltage (10kV) I would expect that I would get a measurable separation. So where is it that your opinion differs from mine and why? @drzoid Very good paper i def bokmarked it. Anyway you are right about charge storing on the outside of a conducting sphere, my goal is to have this charged fluid inside a balloon so even if the charge is resting on the surface (between water and balloon) it is okay. So do you think the double electrode idea and separating the fluid would work better or just to try to charge it wiht one electrode (i.e. suck electrons out).
 P: 371 I have to say I didn't read this paper completely before posting the link. After reading the discussion part at the end it seems to me that the experimenters didn't do their homework. What they got there is a simple electrochemical reaction. It's a form of concentration cell with different ph values at the electrodes. There was no charge stored in the water. And their comparison with the kelvin water dropper is completely inappropriate. In short, I should never have posted that link. Anyway, charging your balloon should be easy. A spark can jump right through the latex skin. So just place the balloon on an insulating surface e.g. a plastic table, and bring a charged object close to the balloon so a spark can jump over.
PF Gold
P: 1,111
 Quote by DrZoidberg I have to say I didn't read this paper completely before posting the link. After reading the discussion part at the end it seems to me that the experimenters didn't do their homework. What they got there is a simple electrochemical reaction. It's a form of concentration cell with different ph values at the electrodes. There was no charge stored in the water. And their comparison with the kelvin water dropper is completely inappropriate. In short, I should never have posted that link.
Have a look also at DOI:10.1021/la900723t