- #1
- 24,775
- 792
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=308
As noted in Woit's blog, the current issue of New Scientist has an editorial headlined:
Physics' greatest endeavour is grinding to a halt
The hunt for a theory of everything is going nowhere fast
We are in "a period of utter confusion", said Nobel laureate David Gross, summing up last week's prestigious Solvay conference on the quantum structure of space and time (see "Baffled in Brussels").
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg18825293.200
In the same issue (New Scientist 10 December 2005) there was an article titled:
Nobel laureate admits string theory is in trouble
---sample exerpts---
"WE DON'T know what we are talking about." That was Nobel laureate David Gross at the 23rd Solvay Conference in Physics in Brussels, Belgium, during his concluding remarks on Saturday. He was referring to string theory...
...“The state of physics today is like it was when we were mystified by radioactivity”...
He compared the state of physics today to that during the first Solvay conference in 1911.
... "They were missing something absolutely fundamental," he said. "We are missing perhaps something as profound as they were back then."
--end quote---
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg18825293.700
As noted in Woit's blog, the current issue of New Scientist has an editorial headlined:
Physics' greatest endeavour is grinding to a halt
The hunt for a theory of everything is going nowhere fast
We are in "a period of utter confusion", said Nobel laureate David Gross, summing up last week's prestigious Solvay conference on the quantum structure of space and time (see "Baffled in Brussels").
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg18825293.200
In the same issue (New Scientist 10 December 2005) there was an article titled:
Nobel laureate admits string theory is in trouble
---sample exerpts---
"WE DON'T know what we are talking about." That was Nobel laureate David Gross at the 23rd Solvay Conference in Physics in Brussels, Belgium, during his concluding remarks on Saturday. He was referring to string theory...
...“The state of physics today is like it was when we were mystified by radioactivity”...
He compared the state of physics today to that during the first Solvay conference in 1911.
... "They were missing something absolutely fundamental," he said. "We are missing perhaps something as profound as they were back then."
--end quote---
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg18825293.700