Can these books be considered valid source of information?

In summary, these books, "101 Key Ideas in Physics" by Jim Breithaupt, "A Brief History of Time" and "The Universe in a Nut Shell" by Stephen Hawking, and "Explaining the Universe" by Charap, are all considered valid sources of information for an English 101 report. However, for academic journal publication, it is recommended to find the original source material that the information is based on.
  • #1
Pakbabydoll
45
0
101 key ideas in Physics by: Jim Breithaupt
A Brief History of time by: Stephen Hawking
The Universe in a Nut Shell by: Stephen Hawking
Explaning the universe by: Charap


I tried the books I found listed under other questions but unfortuantely our dear library does not have any of them...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Depends on what you mean by valid sources of information. If you are writing a report for English 101, then yes they are great sources of valid information. If you are attempting to publish in an academic journal, I would find the orginal source material that the information is based off of.

CraigD, AMInstP
www.cymek.com
 
  • #3
what is this web site?
 

1. Can books be considered a valid source of information in today's digital age?

Yes, books have been a reliable source of information for centuries and continue to be relevant in today's digital age. They are often written by experts in their fields and go through a rigorous editing and fact-checking process before being published.

2. How can I determine if a book is a valid source of information?

You can determine the validity of a book by looking at the author's credentials, the publication date, and the publisher. It's also important to check if the book has been peer-reviewed or if it contains references and citations to support its claims.

3. Are all books considered equal in terms of validity?

No, not all books are considered equal in terms of validity. Some may be biased or contain outdated information, while others may be based on solid research and evidence. It's important to critically evaluate the content and sources of a book before considering it a valid source of information.

4. Are there certain types of books that are more valid sources of information?

Academic books, textbooks, and non-fiction books that are written by experts in their fields are generally considered more valid sources of information compared to self-published books or opinion-based books. However, it's important to evaluate each book individually and not generalize based on its type.

5. Can books be considered more valid sources of information than internet sources?

It depends on the specific book and internet source in question. While books are typically more thoroughly researched and reviewed, there are also reputable websites and online databases that provide reliable information. It's important to evaluate the credibility and accuracy of both sources before making a determination.

Similar threads

A Origin of BH Entropy & Info Missing Puzzle Resolution
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
979
I How can the universe be infinitely big?
    • Cosmology
Replies
5
Views
1K
Data sources for Vehicle Dynamics Model validation?
    • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
935
B Which Hawking paper? (no singularity at the beginning of the universe)
    • Cosmology
Replies
2
Views
2K
Why Information Grows: book review
    • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
984
B How to shorten this speech about BH?
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
28
Views
3K
Recommend me Physics/Philosophy Books?
    • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
6
Views
9K
B Is the Hawking-Hartle Euclidean approach confirmed by CMBR data?
    • Cosmology
Replies
13
Views
2K
Why Popsci is Essential for a Well-Rounded Physics Education
    • General Discussion
Replies
17
Views
1K
Other Free Physics & Astronomy Books: Explore the Cosmos
    • Science and Math Textbooks
2
Replies
62
Views
53K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top