Why babies are so helpless?

  • Thread starter Dmitry67
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the development of walking abilities in mammals, particularly humans. It is noted that humans are born with the inability to walk, unlike other mammals who can walk soon after birth. This is attributed to the need for humans to grow and develop in other areas, such as social interaction and brain growth, before being able to walk. The benefits and reasons for this extended childhood period are debated, with some suggesting it is beneficial for survival and others questioning the evolutionary advantage. It is also mentioned that humans are one of the few species that walk on two legs and this ability comes with its own challenges and requirements. The conversation ends with a discussion on the significance and importance of walking upright in human evolution.
  • #1
Dmitry67
2,567
1
You know, some mammals can walk within few minutes after birth.
And for human beings in takes few years to be able to walk.

Obviously, nature was able to 'pre-wire' our brain so we would be able to walk immediately. It would increase a chance for survival for humans. It could be a benefit BUT... but nature had REMOVED that ability. I say "removed", because more primitive beings have that ability.

So my question is, what HUGE benefits nature and natural selection got from removing that ability and from the prolongation of the period of being total helpless that had completely overweighted obvious benefits of not being absolutely helpless?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
<zombie voice>Brains</zombie voice>
Human babies are born about 2-3months too early compared to most other mammals, because if you waited until they were fully developed the head would be too large for them to be born.
The downside is that they are very vulnerable, the advantage is that they grow up to know how to bang rocks together.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
It does not explain everything.
Babies can not walk in age of 3 month.
Compare babies to Kangaroo
 
  • #4
maybe its something to do with social interaction and bonding, humans are a very sociable and love needing species, therefore its a perfect time when your a baby to hopefully receive that instead of being an independent super baby by the age of 6 months.
 
  • #5
well, babies learn social interaction after age of 1.5 years for the next 20 years.
I don't know why babies can not walk and learn. In fact, they would learn faster.
 
  • #6
Dmitry67 said:
Compare babies to Kangaroo
Kangaroos are a bad example - marsuipial babies are born as very early embryos - they crawl into the pouch where they gestate.
Baby Kangaroos aren't really born from the pouch as such, they just spend longer and longer away from it - rather like a teenager no longer living at home.

Generally how long babies remain dependent on the mother correlates with the length of the pregnancy and the animals lifespan. Baby elephants also spend a long time being cared for. If it takes 1-2years to produce each new set of offspring then it is probably an evolutionarily advantage to put some effort into looking after them rather than with say rodents that can breed more quickly where it makes sense for the babies to become independent quickly to allow a new generation.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
How many other animals learn to walk on two legs and are built for it? Walking on four legs is probably easier than walking on two and human babies learn to crawl before walking on two legs even though we are not quite built for crawling on all fours.

The female chimp has an estrus cycle of about 34 to 35 days. While in heat, the bare skin on her bottom becomes pink and swollen, and she may mate with several males. She normally gives birth to just one baby, which clings tightly to her breast and, like a human baby, develops rather slowly. An infant can sit up at 5 months and stand with support at 6 months. It is still suckled and sleeps with its mother until about 3 years of age, finally becoming independent and separating from her at about 4 years. Sexual maturity is reached between 8 and 10 years.
Apparently chimps develope at a similar rate.
 
  • #8
Babies cannot grow both their brains and bodies at the same time. When you're an infant, it's a choice of one or the other since both are HUGELY expensive in terms of energy. Our ancestors had a limited amount of energy available to them (and there's only so much you could forage in a given day as well) so you couldn't do both at the same time and expect to live. The brain growing before the body would be fatal for species that weren't extremely social and lived in codependent groups because they would die. Why not just grow the body and then concentrate on the brain? Brains develop better when they have more time to grow:

But what are the possible neurological correlates of increased brain size during primate evolution? To address this, Finlay and colleagues concentrated on critical factors that drove mammalian (including primate) brain size, especially the manner and number of neurons generated during development (Finlay and Darlington 1995, Finlay et al. 2001). They found that the longer cytogenesis is prolonged for a given structure (based on timing of the peak in ‘neuronal birthdays’), the larger the structure will ultimately be.

From http://www.anthro.fsu.edu/people/faculty/falk/Handbook_V2.htm [Broken]

So to answer your question; it's better in the long term to grow brains before the rest of the body and humans, being highly social, could afford to support their infants throughout this extended childhood, which (I'm hypothesizing but I could perhaps find references) in turn produced smarter humans who would survive better and support the survival of their own infants to adulthood, and so on and so on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
Thank you, interesting link
 
  • #10
TheStatutoryApe said:
How many other animals learn to walk on two legs and are built for it? Walking on four legs is probably easier than walking on two and human babies learn to crawl before walking on two legs even though we are not quite built for crawling on all fours.
This.

Walking upright is one of the greatest developments in any species that has ever existed. But, it comes with some hefty requirements. First, before we can walk on two legs, we must develop highly functioning motor skills. Measuring the difficulty of bipedal movement over qaudripedal isn't as simple as multiplying by two because we've gotten rid of two legs. To get an idea, imagine a long dining table with two legs. Where the two legs are located isn't important, although some positions are obviously better than others. What is important is that you realize that a table with two legs may be fine for novelty purposes, but is utterly useless (maybe some kids could you it as a skateboard ramp, but you probably aren't eating off it). There are several forces acting on this table, of which Gravity is the most important. With four legs, the table stands a chance. In fact, it doesn't need to concern itself with Gravity at all. However, with two legs... you get where I'm going.

Gravity: there's the rub. Perhaps we will one day evolve to a point where a woman's uterus rotates like a gerbil wheel, and babies will be able to develop their balance and equilibrium in the womb. For now, they'll just have to deal with it when they're born.
 
  • #11
Animals that are prey, or that have parents that abandon them quickly, tend to be more precocious at birth...they need to be able to run quickly or they become a midnight snack.

Those that are predators or have parents that can invest a lot of time in rearing them in a safe place away from predators, are born more altricial. So, even rats are born very altricial, because they are in burrows away from predators.
 
  • #12
Brilliant! said:
Perhaps we will one day evolve to a point where a woman's uterus rotates like a gerbil wheel...

Now there's an image to make you stop and wonder.
 

1. Why are babies born so helpless?

Babies are born helpless because their brains and bodies are not fully developed at birth. Unlike other animals, human babies have a longer period of development in the womb, which means they are born earlier in their development. This allows their heads to fit through the mother's pelvis, but it also means they are less developed and more dependent on their caregivers after birth.

2. How long does it take for a baby to become less helpless?

The time it takes for a baby to become less helpless varies, but generally, babies start to become less dependent on their caregivers around 6 months to 1 year of age. This is when they are able to sit up, crawl, and even walk with some assistance. By age 2, most babies are able to walk and communicate more effectively, making them less helpless.

3. Is being helpless beneficial for babies?

Yes, being helpless is beneficial for babies. It allows them to focus on growing and developing their brains and bodies without having to worry about survival. It also allows them to form strong bonds with their caregivers, which is crucial for their emotional and social development.

4. Are some babies more helpless than others?

Yes, some babies may appear more helpless than others. This can be due to various factors such as premature birth, health conditions, or individual differences in development. However, with proper care and support, all babies will eventually reach the same developmental milestones.

5. Can a baby's environment affect their level of helplessness?

Yes, a baby's environment can play a role in their level of helplessness. A nurturing and stimulating environment can help a baby develop faster and become less dependent on their caregivers. On the other hand, a neglected or stressful environment can delay a baby's development and make them appear more helpless. It is important for caregivers to provide a safe and loving environment for babies to thrive.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
1
Views
267
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
7
Views
902
  • General Discussion
Replies
28
Views
9K
  • Biology and Medical
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top