Combinatorial Proofs of Binomial Identities

In summary, the conversation discusses a combinatorial proof for the identity n^3 - n = 6(nC3) + 6(nC2) where n is greater than or equal to 3. The participants discuss the use of cases and addition to interpret and simplify the equation. They also mention using Pascal's triangle and factoring, but ultimately come to the conclusion that disallowing the case of one person receiving all three medals can help explain the left side of the equation.
  • #1
silvermane
Gold Member
117
0

Homework Statement


(Give a combinatorial proof of each of the following identities. In other words, describe a collection of combinatorial objects and then explain two different methods for counting those objects. Leave each identity in the form given. Do not rearrange terms or use any other identity to simplify the equation.)

Prove that for n greater than or equal to 3,
n^3 - n = 6(nC3) + 6(nC2)

The Attempt at a Solution


This is my first Combinatorics class, and I must say that I don't think like this at all. It's all new to me and I don't understand anything in a combinatorial sense, but rather I understand things inductively and algebraically. Please give me a hint in how I could do this. I don't exactly want an answer, just a little help. Thank you so much for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Try writing n^3 - n as (n+1)*n*(n-1).

Do you know something that this product counts?
 
  • #3
Mathnerdmo said:
Try writing n^3 - n as (n+1)*n*(n-1).

Do you know something that this product counts?

Yeah, say we have a group of n+1 people and we want to have 3 of them sit down in 3 chairs. We could seat the first person in N+1 ways.
The second person in N ways.
The third in N - 1 ways.
(I write it as this because this is how the prof wants it in our hmwk)


I think I understand how to count the left side of the equation. The right side is kinda throwing me off a little here, but I think I simplified it correctly.

Say we arrange the right side as 3x2x(nC3)+3x2x(nC2) and look at it this way for the proof.
Lemme know if I'm on the right track. You've been very helpful :)
 
  • #4
Yeah, that should help.

Do you know how to interpret addition combinatorially? (If so, you probably have an idea of what to do next)
 
  • #5
Mathnerdmo said:
Yeah, that should help.

Do you know how to interpret addition combinatorially? (If so, you probably have an idea of what to do next)

Uh, that's where I am stuck. We just learned summation notation, and he just gave us this. We know that you can take separate cases and add them, but I don't know how to put it into my example. (sorry for being a burden) =/
 
  • #6
silvermane said:
We know that you can take separate cases and add them

Actually, that's all I meant. If you're adding two numbers together, you're just considering two separate cases.

Think about why (n+1) isn't explicitly appearing on the right-hand side. It'll help you figure out what two cases will work.
 
  • #7
Mathnerdmo said:
Actually, that's all I meant. If you're adding two numbers together, you're just considering two separate cases.

Think about why (n+1) isn't explicitly appearing on the right-hand side. It'll help you figure out what two cases will work.

Okay, that helps out a lot. Thank you! =)
 
  • #8
I Understand it in terms of Pascal's triangle and used an example with giving people medals. The only problem is that when I discussed the problem with the professor, I found that we are not allowed to alter the equation in any way.

I have to explain it as a difference rule on the left side, n^3 - n
and it must be 6(nC3) + 6(nC2) for the right side.

I know how to explain the right side, but I am having some trouble with the left side and using the difference rule. I know that n^3 is the number of ways to distribute the medals to the people before the race, where the case of one person getting all three medals is included. I don't know why I would subtract by n though. Any ideas?
 
  • #9
silvermane said:
I Understand it in terms of Pascal's triangle and used an example with giving people medals. The only problem is that when I discussed the problem with the professor, I found that we are not allowed to alter the equation in any way.

I have to explain it as a difference rule on the left side, n^3 - n
and it must be 6(nC3) + 6(nC2) for the right side.

I know how to explain the right side, but I am having some trouble with the left side and using the difference rule. I know that n^3 is the number of ways to distribute the medals to the people before the race, where the case of one person getting all three medals is included. I don't know why I would subtract by n though. Any ideas?

All right. I don't think you'd be able to use pascal's triangle, but I don't think my instructors had a problem with factoring...

What if we don't allow the case of one person getting all three medals? How many ways have we removed when we disallow this?
 
  • #10
Mathnerdmo said:
All right. I don't think you'd be able to use pascal's triangle, but I don't think my instructors had a problem with factoring...

What if we don't allow the case of one person getting all three medals? How many ways have we removed when we disallow this?

Yeah, I did just what you said before reading this! It turns out that it works that way just fine. Thanks for your help :)
 

1. What are combinatorial proofs of binomial identities?

Combinatorial proofs of binomial identities are mathematical proofs that use combinatorial principles, such as counting techniques and properties of combinations and permutations, to show the equality of two binomial expressions. These proofs provide a visual and intuitive explanation for the algebraic manipulation of binomial expressions.

2. What is the purpose of using combinatorial proofs for binomial identities?

The purpose of using combinatorial proofs for binomial identities is to provide a deeper understanding of the algebraic manipulation involved in these identities. It also allows for a more intuitive and visual approach to understanding the concepts, making them more accessible to a wider audience.

3. How are combinatorial proofs of binomial identities different from traditional algebraic proofs?

Combinatorial proofs of binomial identities differ from traditional algebraic proofs in that they use counting principles and visual representations to show the equality of two expressions, rather than solely relying on algebraic manipulations. This approach can provide a more intuitive and concrete understanding of the identities.

4. What are some common binomial identities that can be proven using combinatorial methods?

Some common binomial identities that can be proven using combinatorial methods include the binomial theorem, the Pascal's triangle identity, and the Vandermonde's identity. These identities have various applications in combinatorics, probability, and other areas of mathematics.

5. Are combinatorial proofs of binomial identities considered valid mathematical proofs?

Yes, combinatorial proofs of binomial identities are considered valid mathematical proofs as they follow the same logical steps and use well-established mathematical principles. They are widely accepted and used in the mathematical community to provide a deeper understanding of binomial identities.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
131
Changing the Statement Combinatorial proofs & Contraposition
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
5
Views
810
Replies
6
Views
301
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
5
Views
960
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
843
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top