Why have the evolution compromised with the brain?

In summary, the discussion revolves around the development of brain size among different species and whether or not evolution has considered the size of the brain in relation to a species' survival and social aspects. The limitations of brain size due to human anatomy and the possible adaptation of ambient environments are also brought up. The conversation ends with a suggestion for the poster to do more research on the topic in order to have a more informed and productive discussion.
  • #1
Gliese123
144
0
As the thread: Why haven't the brain among different species developed in general to a size comparable to Homo Sapiens. And even though the brain among Neanderthal was considered to be bigger than Homo Sapiens, did the evolution considered that it was too "big" or too "clumsy" and the race died? Even though environmental factors and limits are definitive for the time span among species development, I think a bigger, more developed and advanced brain is both increasing social & survival aspects for a species, even though what species I'm referring to. Sure, there are limits for how big a brain can be since human anatomy demand a constant temperature , but wouldn't that "easy part" be adapted by the ambient environment? The nature has facilitated many obstacle for lifeforms around the world, why not the limitations for extended brain size? Or haven't the evolution "caught up" the time span?
/An biological Enthusiast.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Gliese123 said:
As the thread: Why haven't the brain among different species developed in general to a size comparable to Homo Sapiens. And even though the brain among Neanderthal was considered to be bigger than Homo Sapiens, did the evolution considered that it was too "big" or too "clumsy" and the race died? Even though environmental factors and limits are definitive for the time span among species development, I think a bigger, more developed and advanced brain is both increasing social & survival aspects for a species, even though what species I'm referring to. Sure, there are limits for how big a brain can be since human anatomy demand a constant temperature , but wouldn't that "easy part" be adapted by the ambient environment? The nature has facilitated many obstacle for lifeforms around the world, why not the limitations for extended brain size? Or haven't the evolution "caught up" the time span?
/An biological Enthusiast.
The brains for different species seem to function just fine, why would they need to change? What makes you think that human brains are maxed out and that they need to be bigger/more advanced?
 
  • #3
Why not?
 
  • #4
Please don't dispute my statement in a negative way.
 
  • #5
Gliese123 said:
Please don't dispute my statement in a negative way.
You've posted idle speculation, you have provided zero scientific facts to back up anything you've said.

You don't want people to question you or point out that your thoughts lack a scientific basis?

Then there is nothing to discuss.

Obviously you did not post with a desire to learn. Do some research on brains, there is a lot you can learn if you truly have a desire. After you have some facts, then you can repost specifc questions about those facts.
 
Last edited:

1. Why is the brain considered the most evolved organ?

The brain is considered the most evolved organ because it is responsible for many complex functions such as memory, decision making, and problem solving. It also controls our body's movements and functions, making it essential for survival.

2. How did the brain evolve over time?

The brain evolved over millions of years through a process called natural selection. As species faced different environmental challenges, those with larger and more complex brains were better equipped to adapt and survive, passing on their genetic traits to future generations.

3. What are some advantages of having a large brain?

Having a large brain allows for more advanced cognitive abilities, such as language, abstract thinking, and social skills. It also provides a greater capacity for learning and adapting to new environments and situations.

4. How has evolution compromised with the brain?

Evolution has compromised with the brain by balancing the energy costs of having a large brain with the benefits it provides. This means that our brains are not as large as they could be, as maintaining a large brain requires a lot of energy. Additionally, certain functions, such as physical strength, may have been sacrificed in favor of a larger brain.

5. Can the brain continue to evolve?

Yes, the brain can continue to evolve through a process called neuroplasticity. This refers to the brain's ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections in response to new experiences and learning. As our environments and lifestyles change, our brains will continue to adapt and evolve.

Similar threads

Why do we consider Neanderthals a different species than humans?
    • Biology and Medical
Replies
20
Views
2K
Current thinking on diet and brain evolution?
    • Biology and Medical
Replies
6
Views
2K
Why Apes and Humans don't have Tails
    • Biology and Medical
Replies
8
Views
1K
Natural selection, evolution "why are we still sick"
    • Biology and Medical
Replies
17
Views
3K
Why does biology deal with why questions?
    • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
1K
Why did it take so long to produce us?
    • Biology and Medical
Replies
21
Views
7K
Humanoid Evolution: Dragon-Like Adaptability & Development
    • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
4
Views
2K
Could a Single Gene Mutation Have Spurred Human Evolution?
    • Biology and Medical
Replies
5
Views
3K
I Why no plane waves of macroscopic bodies? The micro-macro threshold...
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
Unknown Human Group Bone Found in Siberia: New Species?
    • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top