Libya: Rebels Being Slaughtered, no fly zone

  • News
  • Thread starter nismaratwork
  • Start date
In summary, CNN's Senior International Correspondent Nic Robertson and his crew were detained Friday in Tajura, Libya, east of Tripoli by forces loyal to Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi. Robertson and his crew were threatened with execution by Gadhafi's thugs if they did not get in the car and leave. The crew hesitated for a split-second, and Robertson's camera man, Khalil Abdallah, pulled the trigger of an AK-47 and Robertson screamed, "Itla, itla" (meaning "get in the car, get in the car"). The crew got into the car and sped away, and Robertson saw an AK-47 being cocked and the weapon being pulled back
  • #316
we also rendered people to libya's next-door neighbor, egypt. so it's hardly surprising to me.

of course, the interesting thing is how the propaganda machine spins up so easily every time the government picks a new target.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #317
Proton Soup said:
we also rendered people to libya's next-door neighbor, egypt. so it's hardly surprising to me.

of course, the interesting thing is how the propaganda machine spins up so easily every time the government picks a new target.

The thing is whether, for instance, a TV is a
  1. a box into the world,
  2. a box of hedonism,
  3. or a box of quality sold products.

One of the criticism to the US in its dealing with 9/11 was that TV (or newspaper) is too much a mix of 1 and 3, and therefor the media took too much of a national war-pushing spin since wars sell better. (Not that our media is that better, we have a mix between 1 and 2.)

It's not a propaganda machine I think. IMO, it's an effect of telling people what they want to hear, and a majority just wants the 'easy' story.
 
  • #318
MarcoD said:
...But there are also large obstacles to be overtaken...

The arab Spring is an opportunity to wipe the slate and do things differently. Let's hope we take it. Think I'll also take a look at Al Jazeera English for a different perspective on Gadaffi.
 
  • #319
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-14876028

While Algeria accepted Qaddafi's wife, Niger accepted the convey which had his son, Saadi Gaddafi

Niger's government spokesman and Justice Minister Marou Amadou said Saadi Gaddafi was in a convoy along with eight others. Mr Amadou said the convoy was on its way to Agadez in northern Niger and that Saadi and his companions were being allowed in on humanitarian grounds.

The US has urged Niger to detain any individuals who may be sought fro prosecution by the new authorities in Tripoli and confiscate their weapons and money.

Currently, NTC seems to have some troubles with its these two neighbors.
 
  • #320
MarcoD said:
The thing is that intellectuals can be conservative religious people, I think the head member studied Sharia law.

The fact that the majority of Libya is young, and for North-Africa, well-educated, doesn't mean a lot. A (humanist) democracy is the result of centuries of work. I don't expect a lot from young people who were educated under a revolutionary dictatorship (and look at other Arab nations, and get a lot wrong about western worlds).

As I stated in another thread, I am an empathic humanist. Try to explain that to a Libyan.

Of course, I will defend the right of everyone to be religious, or have their own life style, but I do find the Sharia sexist, gender discriminatory, and overly punative. (With all respect, the recognition that it has pretty normal, advanced, and morally right parts, and the acknowledgment that I know little about it.) Anyway, basing a law system on religion [where you can't opt out] to me doesn't feels like a step forward for a young population.

We can't do it, but in my heart I wouldn't mind freezing foreign Libyan accounts to press them to have no referral to Sharia in the constitution as a manner of protecting the public.

EDIT: To me it looks like the population just got fed up with the dictatorship, the revolutionary rhetoric, the fact that Gadaffi was grabbing money, and the fact that he was spending billions in Africa [instead of solving unemployment].

Jalil said it clear in his latest speech: "We are a Muslim people for a moderate Islam"

"We are a Muslim nation, with a moderate Islam, and we will maintain that. You are with us and support us - you are our weapon against whoever tries to hijack the revolution," he said.

But he also warned against secularism, envisaging a state "where sharia [Islamic law] is the main source for legislation".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-14894264
 
  • #321
rootX said:
Jalil said it clear in his latest speech: "We are a Muslim people for a moderate Islam"

From what I have read they seem to be making the right sounds and doing the right things, inviting all including enemies to take part and have a say in Libyas future. A democratic, moderate Islamic state sounds positive, I could even see an implementation of Shariah Law as acceptable, as Libyans are already used to good education and equality for women relative to the rest of Africa, I don't see them going back on that. They seem genuine.
 
  • #322
I thought it would more appropriate to discuss this here.

Proton Soup said:
yeah, I'm pretty convinced at this point that the "crossfire" story is just a cover. (who knows the weapon caliber in a crossfire?) you're right, it is quite problematic to be claiming you want a less tribal, more democratic future, only to keep on doing business as usual.

I doubt "Libya" is claiming for a more democratic future. There is NTC but then I have never come across any source determining how much influence NTC has over rebels and tribes.
 
  • #323
rootX said:
I thought it would more appropriate to discuss this here.



I doubt "Libya" is claiming for a more democratic future. There is NTC but then I have never come across any source determining how much influence NTC has over rebels and tribes.

i haven't paid that much attention to the NTC, to be honest. it was mentioned earlier in this thread, and the thing that caught my eye right away was the top two guys being privatization experts. and, well, there was a new bank formed, but i can't remember if it was affiliated directly with NTC or just a mechanism for rebels to receive funds seized from Gaddafi (something that never happened during the time we were discussing this).

i was a lot more interested in just who was fighting this war. there was never serious effort to finance the rebels. NATO fought this war, and rebels got photo ops.

it's worth discussing, but i'd have to dig around first.
 
  • #324
- A year ago Libya was a member in good standing of the UN. It had a head of state, in place for 40 years.

- A portion of the population rose up in revolt. If a portion of the population of the US, Britain, Russia or China rose up in revolt, it would be instantly suppressed by the constituted and recognized government. But anyway, the UN saw fit to issue a mandate to protect civilians in Libya from harm while the Libyan government attempted to suppress the rebellion.

- NATO took it upon itself to go beyond the mandate, and decided to support and enforce regime change.

- NATO strafed the convoy, and the ex-head of state was killed and dragged through the streets by parties unknown. His body is currently on display in a meat locker for all to see.

- Okay, a bad guy is gone, but what about the rule of law and order, and the presumptive right of a sovereign state to protect itself from violent revolution?

- Is it now okay for unhappy populations anywhere to revolt against their government, and maybe receive protection from the UN and help from NATO?

- Is it now okay for any rejected head of state anywhere to be shot and dragged through the streets and put on display for all to ogle?

- I wonder if a poor example has been set which may come back to haunt us should the shoe be on the other foot?

- If the US and her closest friends are one day no longer the mightiest force on Earth, would it be reasonable to expect outside nations to assist rebels here with weapons, air-cover and intelligence operations to support a revolution, and maybe drag a dead US President around on a rope behind a pick-up?

- Would it be fair to conclude that "might makes right" and "the ends justify the means"? The strong do as they will and the weak do as they must?

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
  • #325
Do as we say, not as we do ...
 
  • #326
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-15530640

Libya's interim authorities have named Tripoli academic Abdurrahim el-Keib as the new prime minister.

It also coincides with the official end of the Nato air campaign that helped overthrow the long-time leader.

Mr Keib, an academic specialising in electrical engineering and based in Tripoli, beat eight other candidates to receive 26 of the 51 votes from members of the NTC.

It will be interesting to see how well a US-UAE educated electrical engineer handles a country like Libya.
 
  • #328
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-16230267
But Libya's competing factions - many of whom remain heavily armed - will want to be sure they get their share of the money, says our correspondent.

I am not sure if adding money to the equation will complicate matters or unify Libya.
 
<h2>1. What is happening in Libya with the rebels being slaughtered?</h2><p>Currently, there is ongoing conflict in Libya between the government forces and rebel groups. The rebels are fighting against the government for control of the country, leading to violence and casualties on both sides.</p><h2>2. Why is there talk of implementing a no fly zone in Libya?</h2><p>A no fly zone is being considered as a potential solution to protect civilians and limit the government's ability to carry out airstrikes on rebel-held areas. It would also prevent the government from receiving military support through air transportation.</p><h2>3. Who are the rebels in Libya?</h2><p>The rebels in Libya are a diverse group made up of various factions and militias. They are united in their opposition to the current government and their desire for political change and greater freedoms.</p><h2>4. How has the international community responded to the situation in Libya?</h2><p>The international community has been closely monitoring the situation in Libya and has expressed concern over the violence and loss of life. Some countries have imposed sanctions on the Libyan government, while others have provided aid and support to the rebels.</p><h2>5. What are the potential consequences of a no fly zone in Libya?</h2><p>Implementing a no fly zone in Libya could potentially escalate the conflict and lead to further violence. It could also strain relations between the international community and the Libyan government. Additionally, enforcing a no fly zone would require significant resources and could result in civilian casualties if not carried out carefully.</p>

1. What is happening in Libya with the rebels being slaughtered?

Currently, there is ongoing conflict in Libya between the government forces and rebel groups. The rebels are fighting against the government for control of the country, leading to violence and casualties on both sides.

2. Why is there talk of implementing a no fly zone in Libya?

A no fly zone is being considered as a potential solution to protect civilians and limit the government's ability to carry out airstrikes on rebel-held areas. It would also prevent the government from receiving military support through air transportation.

3. Who are the rebels in Libya?

The rebels in Libya are a diverse group made up of various factions and militias. They are united in their opposition to the current government and their desire for political change and greater freedoms.

4. How has the international community responded to the situation in Libya?

The international community has been closely monitoring the situation in Libya and has expressed concern over the violence and loss of life. Some countries have imposed sanctions on the Libyan government, while others have provided aid and support to the rebels.

5. What are the potential consequences of a no fly zone in Libya?

Implementing a no fly zone in Libya could potentially escalate the conflict and lead to further violence. It could also strain relations between the international community and the Libyan government. Additionally, enforcing a no fly zone would require significant resources and could result in civilian casualties if not carried out carefully.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
Replies
82
Views
12K
Back
Top