Goldstone bosons in Models with global symmetry, broken by Orbifolding

In summary, the conversation discusses grand unification with extra dimensions, specifically in the case of orbifolding. The Goldstone theorem suggests the existence of massless bosons with the same quantum numbers as the broken generators in theories with global symmetry breaking. The model considered here consists of N_f complex bosons and incorporates breaking via orbifolding. The Lagrangian density is given and the parity of the fields is chosen. However, it is noted that the model does not seem to exhibit spontaneous breaking and the question of why Goldstone bosons do not appear in the spectrum is raised. The possibility of gauging the symmetry and its relationship to extra dimensional theories is also discussed. The concept of blow-up moduli is mentioned, but not
  • #1
timb00
15
0
Hi,

I am interested in grand unification with extra dimensions. Especially the case when
extra dimensions are broken by orbifolding.

Now I am trying to understand how the Goldstonebosons appear in the spectrum of a
theory with global (for example SU(N)) symmetry. From the Goldstonetheorem it follows
that if this breaking is spontaneous then the particle spectrum has to include a set of
massless bosons with the same quantum numbers as the broken generators.

The model considered here consist of [itex]N_f[/itex] complex bosons [itex]\phi_i[/itex]. The lagrangian density is of the form
[tex] L = \frac{1}{2}\partial_M \Phi (\partial^M \Phi)^{\dagger}= \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{N_f}\partial_{M} \phi_i (\partial^{M} \phi_i)^{\dagger}.[/tex]
Where [itex]M=0,1,2,3,4,5[/itex] and the fifth dimension is compactified to
[itex]S^1[/itex] with Radius [itex]R[/itex]. Breaking via Orbifold is incorporated if one
indentifies
[tex] y \sim -y .[/tex]
This yields that the Space-time is [itex]M\times S^1/Z_2[/itex] and the field can be
written in as eigenstates of the Projection operator [itex]P[/itex] with the eigenvalues
[itex]\pm1[/itex]. These eigenstates are given by
[tex] \phi_+(x^{\mu},y) = \sum_n \phi^{(n)}(x^{\mu}) cos(\frac{ny}{R}),[/tex]
[tex] \phi_-(x^{\mu},y) = \sum_n \phi^{(n)}(x^{\mu}) sin(\frac{ny}{R}). [/tex]
We chose the parity of the fields to be
[tex] \underbrace{(-1,...,-1}_{M_f ~\text{times}},1,...,1).[/tex]
This leads to a Lagrangian density of the form
[tex] L= \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{M_f}\partial_{\mu} \phi_i^{(0)} (\partial^{\mu} \phi_i^{(0)})^{\dagger} + \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{M_f}\sum_{n=-\infty,n\neq 0}^{\infty}\left(\partial_{\mu} \phi_i^{(n)} (\partial^{\mu} \phi_i^{(n)})^{\dagger} - \frac{n^2}{R^2} \phi_i^{(n)} \phi_i^{(n)\dagger} \right).[/tex]
Most of the arguments given above a just summaries, and have to be discussed further.
But for my purpose it is enough. Form the Lagrangian given above one finds that Goldstone
bosons dose not appear in the spectrum.

Maybe you can explain to me why they do not occur in the spectrum?

I hope you understand my short review of the model, otherwise feel free to ask.

best regards,

Timb00
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This does not seem to be spontaneous breaking, which would be due to the VEV of a Higgs field. There is no energy level above which the unbroken symmetry is restored. Indeed in a spontanously broken theory the broken symmetries are still there, albeit non-linearly realized (via the Goldstone fields). This is not seem to be the case you describe here.
 
  • #3
Thx suprised for your answer.

The model has a scale which is 1/R. An effective action in a regime of [itex]E << 1/R[/itex]
would only consist of the zero modes of the fields with positive parity.

I'm not sure about the symmetry above the breaking scale, but I think it could be
restored either through the infinite series or through the fact that the zero Modes of
the fields with negative parity can be included by adding a zero.

The reason why this question comes up is that if this symmetry is gauged then the
goldstone bosons appear as the components of the vector field of the extra dimensions.
For example when the model above is gauged one would find that [itex]A^a_5(x)[/itex]
are the goldstone bosons.

Maybe the answer to the question is that this model is an effective description, in four
dimensional field language, of an extra dimension model.

What do you think?

best regards,

Timb00
 
  • #4
I thought the scale given by R is there even before symmetry breaking, and thus is independent from it. The breaking is achieved by imposing y ~ -y, which occurs at all scales, so in a sense the breaking scale is infinite and there is no unbrocken phase at any finite energy. This breaking does not involve the VEV of a scalar field, so I would not consider it as spontaneous.

On the other hand, orbifolds are well known to occur in string theory and there the breaking occurs due to the background geometry, or vacuum state. In this sense, orbifolds do appear as spontaneous symmetry breakings. I am not sure, perhaps the Goldstone modes appear there as blow-up moduli that resolve or smoothen out the orbifold singularity.

PS: yes, such models do occur in extra dimensional theories. But I have problems to understand orbifolds in field theory, anyway.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
I thought the scale given by R is there even before symmetry breaking, and thus is
independent from it. The breaking is achieved by imposing y ~ -y, which occurs at all scales,
so in a sense the breaking scale is infinite and there is no unbrocken phase at any finite
energy. This breaking does not involve the VEV of a scalar field, so I would not consider it as
spontaneous.

I agree with you in this point, I think the problem is that no compactification mechanism is
used, so that this model Lagrangian is just a effective description of theory which is
spontaneously broken at the Planck scale.

The question which bothers me is why do they occur when the symmetry is gauged? Maybe
because the model consist of enough degree's of freedom (with the right quantum numbers)
so that it is possible to identify the massless modes with the goldstone bosons.

On the other hand, orbifolds are well known to occur in string theory and there
the breaking occurs due to the background geometry, or vacuum state. In this sense,
orbifolds do appear as spontaneous symmetry breakings. I am not sure, perhaps the
Goldstone modes appear there as blow-up moduli that resolve or smoothen out the
orbifold singularity.

Maybe is this an explanation, but I do not know what "blow-up moduli" means.

However thanks for your comments.
 

1. What are Goldstone bosons?

Goldstone bosons are particles that arise in theories with spontaneous symmetry breaking. They are massless and have spin 0, and are associated with the breaking of a continuous global symmetry.

2. What is a model with global symmetry?

A model with global symmetry is a theoretical framework in which the laws of physics are invariant under a transformation that acts on all points in space and time simultaneously. This symmetry is not related to the geometry of space or time, but instead refers to the properties of the underlying particles.

3. How does Orbifolding break global symmetry?

Orbifolding is a mathematical technique used in theoretical physics to break global symmetries. It involves compactifying extra dimensions of space and then identifying certain points in this compactified space, which results in the breaking of the global symmetry.

4. What are the implications of Goldstone bosons in models with global symmetry broken by Orbifolding?

The presence of Goldstone bosons in models with global symmetry broken by Orbifolding can have important consequences for the behavior of physical systems. These bosons can interact with other particles and give rise to phenomena such as superfluidity, superconductivity, and the Higgs mechanism.

5. How are Goldstone bosons in models with global symmetry broken by Orbifolding relevant to real-world applications?

Goldstone bosons in models with global symmetry broken by Orbifolding have found applications in various fields such as condensed matter physics, high-energy physics, and cosmology. They have been used to study the properties of superfluids and superconductors, as well as to understand the nature of the Higgs field and the origin of mass in the universe.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
754
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
370
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
782
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
297
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
631
  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
254
  • Calculus
Replies
1
Views
951
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top