Is Nuclear Power the Future of Space Propulsion?

  • Thread starter Winzer
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Nuclear
In summary, there is some research being done into nuclear power for space propulsion, but the funding is very limited. NASA and others have other priorities. The simplest form of nuclear propulsion to develop would be a nuclear powered ion drive, but the thrust is small compared to other options.
  • #1
Winzer
598
0
Is there any research being done for: using nuclear power for space propulsion?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #3
Winzer said:
Is there any research being done for: using nuclear power for space propulsion?
In short yes, but the funding is very limited, and NASA and others have other priorities.
 
  • #4
The simplest form of nuclear propulsion to develop would be a nuclear powered ion drive. Ion drives work and just need electricity, so I'm not sure there would be that steep of a curve to develop one...there'd just have to be a need.
 
  • #5
russ_watters said:
The simplest form of nuclear propulsion to develop would be a nuclear powered ion drive. Ion drives work and just need electricity, so I'm not sure there would be that steep of a curve to develop one...there'd just have to be a need.
Those are interesting, but the thrust is small compared to a chemical engine, or maybe for our theoretical nuclear engine.

It just seems to me nuclear power in space fits. It is definitely sustainable. The reaction itself on a spacecraft would be dangerous though.
 
  • #6
I think the upcoming ANS meeting in June will have a talk about NETS (nuclear and emerging technologies for space). You could probably find out which papers will be discussed and get a copy if you have access to academic journels at your university.
 
  • #7
One can find links to space nuclear power here, including some papers in pdf.

http://anstd.ans.org/ [Mentors' note - this is a correction to a broken link]

Project Prometheus was the latest NASA/DOE program in an attempt to achieve something along the lines of nuclear propulsion in space. But coming as it did after the loss of Columbia, and when O'Keefe was given the directive to reduce cost, it was one of the programs to be indefinitely deferred. Nuclear power (and propulsion) is at the bottom of the list at NASA.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
One of my fellow undergraduates is currently working with Idaho National Laboratory (INL) on a project having to do with developing nuclear power for space
 
  • #9
russ_watters said:
The simplest form of nuclear propulsion to develop would be a nuclear powered ion drive. Ion drives work and just need electricity, so I'm not sure there would be that steep of a curve to develop one...there'd just have to be a need.
Ion drives also need a bottle (or many bottles) of xenon gas or other high mass ion for consumption as the propellant. To understand the advantage of ion mass,

Energy E = (1/2) m v2.
Momentum p = m v
Therefore p = sqrt(2 m E)

So you get more thrust from a high mass ion.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_engines#Propellants
 
  • #10
Over a long term mission that seems like it would be a bit of a large load. Carrying enough gas for a several month journey.

Although you wouldn't be constantly burning the engines the whole way to your destination.

How about an engine design like this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farnsworth-Hirsch_Fusor
 
  • #11
With respect to energy requirements of ion propulsion, it is actually preferable to use ions of least mass in order to maximize ion speed/velocity.

let qV = 1/2 mv2, where q is the charge, V is the accelerating potential, m is the ion mass, and v is the exhaust velocity

then v = sqrt(2qV/m).


Xe is preferable from the standpoint of it's low ionization potential compared to other gases, but the trade off is low Isp. And actually, Cs is perhaps even better from the standpiont of ionziation potential.

Hydrogen would be ideal for Isp, but it has high ionization potential (13.6 eV) and low density in gas and liquid form, and liquid is disadvantageous from the standpoint of cryogenic systems.

Diborane B2H6 would be an interesting propellant, but it's very explosive in air.
 
  • #12
Although seeing as the air in space is so thin that wouldn't be a problem. The tanks would just have to be atmospherically isolated from the rest of the ship. Kept in an unpressurized section.
 

What is nuclear propulsion for space travel?

Nuclear propulsion is a form of rocket propulsion that uses nuclear energy to generate thrust, allowing spacecraft to travel at high speeds and cover long distances in space.

How does nuclear propulsion work?

Nuclear propulsion works by utilizing the energy released from nuclear reactions to heat a propellant, such as liquid hydrogen, which is then expelled through a nozzle to create thrust. This process is known as nuclear thermal propulsion.

What are the advantages of using nuclear propulsion for space travel?

The main advantage of nuclear propulsion is its high specific impulse, which is a measure of how efficiently a rocket uses fuel. Nuclear propulsion has a much higher specific impulse compared to traditional chemical rockets, allowing for faster and more efficient space travel.

Are there any safety concerns with using nuclear propulsion for space travel?

While there are some safety concerns with nuclear propulsion, such as the potential for radioactive materials to be released in the event of an accident, extensive safety measures are in place to minimize these risks. Additionally, nuclear propulsion is only used for space travel and not for launching rockets from Earth.

Is nuclear propulsion currently being used for space travel?

Currently, nuclear propulsion is not being used for space travel, but it has been successfully tested in the past. NASA is currently researching and developing new nuclear propulsion technologies for potential use in future space missions.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
791
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
0
Views
587
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
903
Replies
5
Views
891
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top