| New Reply |
Grounding strategies in equipment |
Share Thread |
| Jun6-12, 12:30 PM | #1 |
|
|
Grounding strategies in equipment
When there are multiple electronics sub-system interconnected, I have seen some applications where one of the sub-systems will include a current limiting resistor as well as some EMC related components at its ground input to protect itself.
The case being that this device is on a vehicle, and when another device on the vehicle lost its ground, it began to use the ground connection of the first device and caused damage to the device (before it had a ground protection designed into it). Now, if 2 boxes are talking to each other on some kind of digital interface, it is necessary for them to share a common ground reference. However, it is possible if one device malfunctions and has a bad ground, it could cause the other device to malfunction as well, right? Is it better to protect against the potential ground fault issue, or to ensure both boxes always have a solid common ground? |
| Jun6-12, 12:41 PM | #2 |
|
|
Dragonpetter,
This is a very big topic that spans issues of signal integrity, electromagnetic compatibility, and electrical safety. |
| Jun6-12, 12:52 PM | #3 |
|
|
If I can go with what you said, my impression is that it would be best to isolate grounds to maintain safety/protection and combine this with the above two techniques to retain signal integrity that might be compromised by the ground isolation. |
| Jun6-12, 12:57 PM | #4 |
|
|
Grounding strategies in equipment
You should note that the requirements for logic 1 and logic zero have a range of voltage values (dependent upon the power supply value).
So the fact that one device is referencing its pulses to a voltage above another is not necessarily a problem. Obviously there will be less overlap for the window of acceptance. |
| Jun6-12, 12:59 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
| Jun6-12, 01:41 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
| Jun6-12, 02:20 PM | #7 |
|
|
I am thinking of just putting a 120 ohm resistor and maybe a t-filter (with respect to 5V) in series between the two sub-system's grounds. I don't think these components will affect signal integrity, as the signals are just toggle/flag states, rather than data transmission. Optical isolation and differential signals are still of value though. |
| Jun6-12, 06:13 PM | #8 |
|
|
Capacitive isolation?
|
| Jun6-12, 11:44 PM | #9 |
|
|
I deal with big systems. Without specificity, in general, I believe having a central ground point and use heavy gauge wire connect to individual module. As for interconnecting signal, I still use good grounding if I don't go to differential signals. In ribbon cable, I use alternate ground for more critical signals, for not as critical signals, at least one ground for every two to three signals. The important thing is how the ground on the ribbon cable connector grounded on the pcb and pcb to the module. To prevent ground loop for picking up EM noise, use ferrite clips of the ribbon cable. If you have a high current signal going from one box to the other, I would not let the return signal go through ground, have a separate return for the signal so current don't travel through the ground. For high noise environment, you might have to consider opto coupler or differential signals. I would not put a resistor between the two grounds of the two modules. |
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Grounding strategies in equipment
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Need better E&M strategies. | Electrical Engineering | 8 | ||
| Homework Strategies | Academic Guidance | 12 | ||
| Risk Strategies | General Discussion | 14 | ||
| Strategies | General Math | 1 | ||
| Debate Strategies | General Discussion | 11 | ||