- #1
- 8,142
- 1,756
I ran across this paper some time ago. I would be interested in any comments that you may have.
http://www.laboratory.ru/articl/hypo/eax060.htm
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.laboratory.ru/articl/hypo/eax060.htmThe aim of our research is to define a tie of electrodynamics and gravitation and to define a tie of Newtonian constant of gravitation G and electromagnetic constants. Has been discovered a global tie between Newtonian constant of gravitation G and major fundamental physical constants and has been got mathematical equation for calculation of constant G. Has been found out that Newtonian constant of gravitation G includes in oneself Planck constant h. A tie between constants which has been opened by us allows to get all the fundamental physical constants by mathematical calculation on base of special group of constants. As an initial constants for getting Newtonian constant of gravitation G we used only 4 fundamental physical constants: speed of light in vacuum, Planck constant, Rydberg constant, fine-structure constant. We discovered a group of independent primary constants, which allowed to get not only the constant G, but also the other fundamental physical constants with exactness 9 v10 digits by mathematical calculation. Results, which have been got, open the new possibilities in research of problems of microgravity, indicate on single nature of electromagnetism and gravitation and on possibility of management by gravitation with help of electromagnetic technologies.
Originally posted by loop quantum gravity
i only know of one connection (it doesn't mean this is the only one which exists) and it's:
planck length which is sqrt(G*h/2pi*c).
well then my book (companion to the cosmos) is wrong.Originally posted by jcsd
That's not a connection, that's the defintion of the Planck length (it should be c3), the Planck length is derived from these fundamental constants.
Originally posted by loop quantum gravity
well then my book (companion to the cosmos) is wrong.
Originally posted by Ivan Seeking
http://www.laboratory.ru/articl/hypo/eax060.htm
Originally posted by Ivan Seeking
No nay-sayers to this paper?
I was not sure what to think.
Originally posted by jcsd
No the paper's obviously bunk.
The relationship between G and h is that they are both fundamental physical constants that play a crucial role in our understanding of the universe. G is the constant that relates the force of gravity between two objects to their masses and distance, while h is the constant that relates the energy of a photon to its frequency.
The connection between G and h is important because it helps us understand the fundamental laws of physics. These constants are used in various equations and theories, such as Newton's law of universal gravitation and the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics.
G and h are measured using different experimental techniques. G is typically measured using a torsion balance, while h is measured using various methods such as the photoelectric effect or blackbody radiation. These experiments require precise and sophisticated equipment to obtain accurate values.
While G and h are considered to be fundamental constants, there have been some discrepancies in their measured values over time. This has led scientists to question if these constants are truly constant or if they vary under certain conditions. However, the current consensus is that G and h are indeed constant, with any discrepancies being attributed to experimental errors.
The connection between G and h is crucial in the theory of general relativity, which explains the force of gravity as the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of mass and energy. G is used in the Einstein field equations to quantify this curvature, while h is used in the equations for the energy-momentum tensor. This connection helps bridge the gap between classical mechanics and modern theories of gravity.