Burnup Vs. Consumption Rate

In summary: The U-238 fissions are a result of fast fissions and the U-235 fissions are a result of thermal fissions. In summary, Lamarsh discusses two important concepts related to nuclear fuel: burnup and consumption rate. Burnup refers to the amount of fission energy released per unit mass of fuel, while consumption rate refers to the amount of fissile material consumed per unit energy produced. There is some variation in how these terms are defined and calculated, but they are commonly used in the field of nuclear engineering. It is important to note that burnup can also be expressed as energy produced per unit mass of initial fuel, or as the percentage of initial fissile material that has undergone fission. Additionally, the conversion factors
  • #1
terryphi
59
0
So, In Lamarsh,

when he talks about the burnup , he's talking about the fission energy released per unit mass of fuel

where as when he talks about consumption rate, he's talking about the amount of fissile matter consumed per unit energy produced?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
terryphi said:
So, In Lamarsh,

when he talks about the burnup , he's talking about the fission energy released per unit mass of fuel

where as when he talks about consumption rate, he's talking about the amount of fissile matter consumed per unit energy produced?
The consumption rate is simply the mass of fuel consumed per unit time, which would be derived from the power level or fission rate divided by the energy produced per fission (and using various conversion factors).

Burnup is often expressed as energy produced (power integrated over time) per unit mass of initial fuel. It is also expressed, by some, as FIMA, fissioned initial metal atoms.

Roughly 1% FIMA or 0.01 fissioned atoms corresponds to ~950 GWd/tU, based on 200 MeV of recoverable energy per fission. The conversion varies based on what is assumed as recoverable energy. The energy per fission is less for U-235 than for Pu-239/-241, so the relationship between FIMA and GWd/tU changes with cycle exposure, or fissile content. MOX (U,PuO2) would have a higher energy per fission at BOL.
 
  • Like
Likes Fanyuhan1997
  • #3
In class we were taught that (CR) = (1+alpha)BR


Is it just me, or is there no uniformly agreed upon definition?
 
  • #4
terryphi said:
In class we were taught that (CR) = (1+alpha)BR


Is it just me, or is there no uniformly agreed upon definition?
Which Lamarsh book is one using?

I assume CR = conversion ratio, and BR is breeding ratio? Breeding means beyond that which is used in the reactor. LWR convert U-238 to Pu-239, but they consume some of the Pu-239, and produce less fissile material than consumed, so they are not considered breeders.
 
  • #5
We're using "Introduction to Nuclear Engineering"

CR -> consumption rate
BR -> Burnup Rate.
 
  • #6
terryphi said:
We're using "Introduction to Nuclear Engineering"

CR -> consumption rate
BR -> Burnup Rate.
I have the third edition.

Consumption rate as used in the text refers to consumption of U-235 (or rather depletion = loss of U-235). Then they use burnup rate for grams (of U-235) fissioned per day. IMO, this muddies the water, since not all fission occur in U-235.

The burnup rate is based on fissions, while the consumption rate is based on fission + neutron absorption by U-235. In addition to fissioning, the U-235 may absorb a neutron and become U-236, which has a low fission cross-section. In fact, U-236 will absorb a neutron and become U-237, which decays to Np-237.

In reality, about 8 to 10% of fissions occur in U-238 as a result of fast fissions. Some U-238 is converted to Pu-239, -240 and -241, and at high burnups, ~40 GWd/tU, most thermal fissions occur in Pu-239/-241 in high enrichment (> 4%) fuel.
See chapter 2 in http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9263 - particularly page 18 and Fig. 2-5.

Most of the time, burnup is calculated using the thermal energy, which does not distinguish among fast fissions and thermal fissions or the isotopes producing fission.

Another factor to consider is that large nuclear reactor have fuel of different vintage, which are divided into batches. At the beginning of a cycle, there is fresh fuel (no exposure), which may be one quarter to almost one half of the core. There is an almost equal amount of fuel (once-burned) being reinserted for a second cycle. There is some smaller fraction of twice-burned fuel in for a third cycle, if the core loads between one-third and one-half of the core. In plants using more than three batches, there may be some thrice-burned assemblies in for a fourth cycle. The third and fourth cycle assemblies are loaded on the periphery of the core, and they function more as a reflector since the power density is generally less than one-third of core average power.

High burnup fuel, with exposures (burnups) > 40 GWd/tU will have most fissions in Pu-239/-241, as well as some portions of fissions in U-238.
 

1. What is the difference between burnup and consumption rate?

Burnup refers to the amount of fuel that has been used in a nuclear reactor, while consumption rate is the rate at which the fuel is being used. Burnup is measured in units of gigawatt-days per metric ton of heavy metal (GWd/MTU), while consumption rate is measured in units of metric tons per year (MT/yr).

2. How do burnup and consumption rate affect the performance of a nuclear reactor?

Burnup and consumption rate are important factors in determining the efficiency and longevity of a nuclear reactor. A higher burnup and consumption rate can lead to greater energy production, but can also cause more wear and tear on the reactor components and decrease its lifespan.

3. Can burnup and consumption rate be controlled in a nuclear reactor?

Yes, burnup and consumption rate can be controlled by adjusting the reactor's fuel cycle. This involves changing the type and amount of fuel used, as well as the length of time the fuel is in the reactor. By carefully managing the fuel cycle, operators can optimize burnup and consumption rate for the desired performance and safety of the reactor.

4. How do burnup and consumption rate affect nuclear waste?

A higher burnup and consumption rate can lead to the production of more nuclear waste, as the fuel is used up at a faster rate. This waste must be properly managed and disposed of to prevent any potential environmental or health hazards. However, higher burnup and consumption rate can also reduce the overall amount of nuclear waste produced, as it allows for more efficient use of the fuel.

5. Are there any safety concerns related to burnup and consumption rate?

There are potential safety concerns related to burnup and consumption rate, as higher levels of burnup and consumption can lead to increased radiation levels and higher temperatures within the reactor. This must be carefully monitored and managed to ensure the safety of both the reactor and its operators. Additionally, if burnup and consumption rate are not properly controlled, it can lead to fuel damage or even a nuclear accident.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top