Possible to engineer an ecosystem with only symbiotic relationships?

In summary, Gannet believes that it is not just some theoretical considerations - one purpose is bringing life to extreme conditions of e.g. Mars - we shouldn't allow for any pathogens there as they could easily destroy everything. Such eventual ecosystem should be designed bottom-up to be as effective as possible - use only symbiotic relationships. However, creating such sterile ecosystem would be extremely difficult.
  • #1
bcrelling
69
2
I was imagining in the future with technological and moral advancement, there might be a drive to engineer an ecosystem without conflict an pain i.e. no predatory or parasitical relationships.

It would only be a natural progression from veganism to wish to stop animals from causing pain to each other.

Do you think it could be possible to engineer a stable ecosystem based purely on symbiotic relationships?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
bcrelling said:
I was imagining in the future with technological and moral advancement, there might be a drive to engineer an ecosystem without conflict an pain i.e. no predatory or parasitical relationships.

It would only be a natural progression from veganism to wish to stop animals from causing pain to each other.

Do you think it could be possible to engineer a stable ecosystem based purely on symbiotic relationships?

My guess is

1 you could engineer it

2 it would not evolve by itself

3 after you had engineered it the things you don't want would evolve from it.
 
  • #3
I was thinking about such harmonic ecosystem - without organisms fighting each other, what is terrible waste of resources, but designed to optimally use them.
It is not just some theoretical considerations - one purpose is bringing life to extreme conditions of e.g. Mars - we shouldn't allow for any pathogens there as they could easily destroy everything. Such eventual ecosystem should be designed bottom-up to be as effective as possible - use only symbiotic relationships.

However, creating such sterile ecosystem would be extremely difficult.
We have microbes everywhere, we have endogenous retroviruses in our DNA ... such artificial ecosystem would have lots of empty ecological niche and even currently symbiotic bacteria could evolve to take such a niche - for example by developing aggressive behavior.
But it could be doable in let say 50 years - choose well (modified) organisms we would like to use in our ecosystem, synthetise their DNA from zero with removed endogeneous retroviruses, also removed genes of proteins which are used for aggressive behavior ... and to be really sure that there is no contamination, do it in the incompatible chiral life version.
 
  • #4
jarekd said:
I was thinking about such harmonic ecosystem - without organisms fighting each other, what is terrible waste of resources, but designed to optimally use them.
It is not just some theoretical considerations - one purpose is bringing life to extreme conditions of e.g. Mars - we shouldn't allow for any pathogens there as they could easily destroy everything. Such eventual ecosystem should be designed bottom-up to be as effective as possible - use only symbiotic relationships.

Assuming you manage to do all that, and assuming that those lifeforms function just like their real counterparts, I highly doubt that the system would be able to remain that way. Taking an environment where there is differential reproduction, evolution will inevitably take place. And so organisms will begin occupying niches that are not already occupied, and that includes pathogens, predators etc...
 
  • #5
Sure, it would be a matter of time to evolve to take these niches, but it takes a lot of time - the purpose would be to start life on e.g. Mars, for which a few decades/centuries should be enough for a head start - then it should evolve to be more adapted, robust for these extreme conditions.
Evolution speed depends on the number of organisms, what would be a few orders of magnitude smaller than on Earth. The most dangerous and fastest would be evolution of microbes, but it mainly uses available gene pool - if we would remove proteins used for aggressive behavior from there (e.g. hemolysin, restrictase), evolving them from scratch would take millions of years ... but the only way I see to really remove them from gene pool is to use chiral life.
 
  • #6
Please keep this discussion focused on the prevalence and possible exclusion of parasitism in ecosystems. Terraforming of Mars by genetically modified organisms is a speculative endeavour and in this context would run counter to the site rules.
 
  • #7
Ryan_m_b, so please explain how you would like to introduce "exclusion of parasitism" in our ecosystem?
 
  • #8
I never said I did, I was posting from a moderation standpoint to keep this thread within the rules.
 
  • #9
To engineer such a sustaining (balanced) ecosystem would require the correct mix of producers, consumers, and decomposers.
 
  • #10
Gannet, the problem are unwanted guests ... and we are fighting with them every day using different kind of poisons ... leading e.g. to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multidrug_tolerance]multidrug[/PLAIN] [Broken] tolerance[/quote].
There are also lots of other unwanted mechanisms reducing efficiency of ecosystems ... like unimaginable huge number of [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transposon]transposones
in every cell ...

The only, hypothetical way to really get rid of unwanted guests could be starting from over: by synthesizing from zero incompatible version of only wanted life ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
jarekd said:
Gannet, the problem are unwanted guests ... and we are fighting with them every day using different kind of poisons ... leading e.g. to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multidrug_tolerance]multidrug[/PLAIN] [Broken] tolerance
.
There are also lots of other unwanted mechanisms reducing efficiency of ecosystems ... like unimaginable huge number of [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transposon]transposones
in every cell ...

The only, hypothetical way to really get rid of unwanted guests could be starting from over: by synthesizing from zero incompatible version of only wanted life ...[/QUOTE]

I agree jarekd, I have a difficult time of manually or organically keeping unwanted guest out of my lawn and garden. However, I assumed the OP was referring to something like Biosphere 2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
I don't think it's realistic to completely get rid of predation/parasitism. Such organisms will arise through evolution. What is more doable is making sure the levels of predation/parasitism never reach a level that undermine the stability of the ecosystem. To do that I think you simply need to choose carefully what organisms you put in your primary secondary waves of ecological succession. Focusing on microbes will make the whole thing easier.
 

1. Can an ecosystem survive with only symbiotic relationships?

Yes, it is possible to engineer an ecosystem with only symbiotic relationships. Symbiotic relationships involve two or more species living in close physical association, which can provide benefits to all parties involved. These relationships can help maintain a balanced ecosystem and ensure the survival of all species.

2. What are the benefits of an ecosystem with only symbiotic relationships?

An ecosystem with only symbiotic relationships can have several benefits. These relationships can help with nutrient cycling, pollination, and pest control. They can also increase the resilience of the ecosystem to external disturbances and provide a stable food source for all species involved.

3. How do scientists engineer an ecosystem with only symbiotic relationships?

Scientists can engineer an ecosystem with only symbiotic relationships by carefully selecting and introducing species that have beneficial relationships with each other. This can involve studying the natural symbiotic relationships in an existing ecosystem and replicating them in the engineered ecosystem. Genetic engineering can also be used to create synthetic symbiotic relationships between species.

4. Are there any challenges in engineering an ecosystem with only symbiotic relationships?

Yes, there are some challenges in engineering an ecosystem with only symbiotic relationships. One of the main challenges is ensuring that the introduced species are able to thrive and maintain their symbiotic relationships in the new environment. There may also be competition between different symbiotic relationships, and it can be difficult to predict the long-term effects of these relationships on the ecosystem.

5. Can an ecosystem with only symbiotic relationships be sustainable?

Yes, an ecosystem with only symbiotic relationships can be sustainable if it is carefully designed and managed. This requires a thorough understanding of the relationships between the different species and how they contribute to the overall functioning of the ecosystem. Regular monitoring and adjustments may also be needed to maintain the balance and sustainability of the ecosystem.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
743
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
32
Views
9K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
734
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
897
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top