How can I integrate sqrt(1+x^2)dx using substitution?

  • Thread starter braindead101
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integration
In summary, the conversation discusses various methods for integrating the expression integ (sqrt (1+x^2)dx), including substitution, trigonometric identities, hyperbolic functions, and integration by parts. The conversation also includes a question about evaluating a double integral, which is solved using some of these techniques.
  • #1
braindead101
162
0
I can't seem to figure out how to integrate this.

integ ( sqrt (1+x^2) dx )

I am pretty sure I need to substitute the inside but I cannot figure out what. I have tried substituting x = tan theta, and i get stuck at integral (sec (theta)^3 dtheta)

here is my work: (I am goin to use q as theta)

integ ( sqrt (1+x^2) dx )
let tan q = x
sec^2q dq = dx

integ ( sqrt (1+tan^2q) sec^2 q dq )
= integ (sqrt (sec^2 q) sec^2 q dq ) (trig identity)
= integ (sec q (sex^2 q) dq)
= integ (sec^3 q dq)
= integ (1/sin^3 q dq)

and I am stuck here...
unless this is the wrong substitution, in which case, i have no clue.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Try [tex]\int{\sec{x}\sec^2{x}dx} = \int{\sec{x}\left(1+\tan^2{x}\right)dx}[/tex]

And [itex]\sec{x}[/itex] is [itex]\frac{1}{\cos{x}}[/itex], not [itex]\frac{1}{\sin{x}}[/itex]. :wink:
 
  • #3
Substitute [itex]x=\sinh t [/itex]. And use a double angle formula for the hyperbolic functions.
 
  • #4
You can also do it with integration by parts, it's pretty lengthy but you don't have to deal with hyperbolic or trig substitutions.
 
  • #5
Dex's substitution gets you there the fastest, but you may not know about hyperbolic trig functions yet. You can use the x= tan theta substitution, but of course the resulting sec cubed integral is not the easiest. So if you really want to go that way, do integration by parts on the sec cubed integral, its actually not that lengthy compared to other elementary methods. You should get the sec cubed integral on both sides of the equation, then its just simple algebra.
 
  • #6
I have tried to do the hyperbolic trig way because I am stuck on mine and I can't seem to integrate the sec^3q

this is what i have for hyperbolic, i am stuck and can't seem to integrate the last one

integ (sqrt (1+x^2)dx)
let x = sinh t
dx/dt = cosh t
integ (sqrt (1+sinh^2t) (cosh t dt))
identity: cosh^2t - sinh^2t = 1
integ (sqrt (cosh^2t) cosh t dt)
integ (cosh^2t dt)

how do i integrate this?
 
  • #7
[tex]\cosh^2 x = \frac{1 + \cosh (2x)}{2}[/tex]
 
  • #8
okay, so I have done everything and integrated the whole thing, now because I have never learned about the hyperbolic function, i am having trouble doing this.

here is my work for the rest of the integration:
(previous work)
integ (sqrt (1+x^2)dx)
let x = sinh t
dx/dt = cosh t
integ (sqrt (1+sinh^2t) (cosh t dt))
identity: cosh^2t - sinh^2t = 1
integ (sqrt (cosh^2t) cosh t dt)
integ (cosh^2t dt)
(finishing it off)
integ ( (1+ cosh(2t))/2 dt)
= 1/2 integ ( 1+cosh(2t) dt)
= 1/2 [ t + 1/2 sinh (2t) ]

So my actual question was to evaluate this:
and now with the sinh, I am unsure how to evaluate this. What is the relationship between sinh and sin?

actual question:
[tex]\int^{1}_{0}\int^{1}_{y}\sqrt{1+x^{2}}dxdy[/tex]
 
  • #9
Well to do your iterated integral:

First finish off the anti derivative for the inner integral. To do this, first use the definition:
[tex]\sinh x = \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2}[/tex]. We define the inverse function and call it argsinh. Also, use the following identitys (which you can verify from the definition): [tex]\sinh (2t) = 2 \sinh t \cosh t[/tex] and [tex]\cosh^2 t - \sinh^2 t = 1[/tex]

So now the anti derivative is [tex]\frac{ \argsinh x}{2} + \frac{x \sqrt{1+x^2}}{2}[/tex]

Now, argsinh 1 = 0, because if you let x=0 into the sinh definition, you get 1.
The Inner integral is now thus: [tex]\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} - \frac{ \argsinh y}{2} - \frac{y\sqrt{1+y^2}}{2}[/tex].

So now for the outer integral, the first part is very straightforward, the 3rd part just needs a substitution u=y^2+1. The only one that is somewhat difficult is the argsinh one, which you can get by integration by parts. First take the factor of 1/2 out of the integral, then let u= argsinh y, dv=dy.

Good luck
 
  • #10
okay, i have read this about 10 times trying to understand this, i have tried substituting everything into get the antiderivative you got, but i constantly get something different.
why is this integral so hard , am i doing it the hard way is there an easier way to compute this.
 
  • #11
Using some techniques, it's pretty easy.
 

Attachments

  • 184733.doc
    19.5 KB · Views: 168
  • #12
i'm not sure if i can use the formula to help the integration because i also have this formula somewhere, but i don't see how else i can integrate without it as the solution with the hyperbolic substitution is too difficult for me.

nevermind i see how you did this, and i would have never known how to do this...
i clearly am in the wrong major
 
Last edited:

1. What is integration with squareroot?

Integration with squareroot is a mathematical technique used to find the antiderivative or integral of a function that involves a squareroot. It is used to calculate the area under a curve in a specific interval.

2. How do you integrate a function with a squareroot?

To integrate a function with a squareroot, you can use the substitution method. This involves substituting the squareroot term with a new variable, then solving the resulting integral and substituting the variable back in.

3. What are some common examples of integration with squareroot?

Common examples of integration with squareroot include finding the area under a parabola, calculating the arc length of a circle, and determining the volume of a sphere.

4. What are the benefits of using integration with squareroot?

Integration with squareroot allows us to solve complex mathematical problems involving various functions, such as trigonometric, exponential, and logarithmic functions. It also helps in calculating important geometric measurements like area, arc length, and volume.

5. Are there any limitations to integration with squareroot?

One limitation of integration with squareroot is that it can be challenging to find the exact antiderivative or integral of some functions. In some cases, we may need to use numerical methods or approximations to solve the integral. Additionally, it may not be applicable to certain types of functions, such as those with complex or imaginary numbers.

Similar threads

  • Calculus
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
347
  • Calculus
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top