Relative Velocity & De Broglie's Theory

In summary: That's because of the presence of the momentum in the denominator of the deBroglie relation. Momentum transforms just like length does. So if you change the momentum or anything in the denominator you get a different wavelength.
  • #1
DeepGround
16
0
Hello,

I would like to determine the Wavelength of many different macroscopic objects for a theoretical project and I am having trouble understanding how to use the equation correctly due to relative velocities.

When computing Wavelength = h/ Velocity * Mass I see example of calculating the wavelength of a baseball that is moving at 40 meters per second and weighs .14 kg.

So I see that I need to use Meters per Second for velocity and KiloGrams or 1000x Grams for Mass. The trouble is that Velocity is relative, so this only gives you a wavelength of a baseball relative to the earth.

I do not understand what the Earth has to do with the wavelength of the baseball, are all wavelengths only relative? Is there no wavelength for the object itself? This means that the baseball has a huge amount of wavelengths depending on how you look at it.

Also Plank's constant can be written in many different ways, and be different numbers. How would I know what number to use when I am talking of velocity in meters per second and mass in 1000x grams.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
DeepGround said:
I do not understand what the Earth has to do with the wavelength of the baseball,

The Earth has nothing to do with the wavelength of the baseball. It's the frame of the Earth that matters.

are all wavelengths only relative?

Yes.

Is there no wavelength for the object itself?

Well, in relativity one refers to quantities such as the length of an object or the lifetime of a particle in the rest frame as the "proper length" and "proper time", respectively. We can't do that with deBroglie wavelengths however, because [itex]\lambda=h/p[/itex]. In the rest frame of the baseball, [itex]p=0[/itex], and [itex]\lambda[/itex] is undefined. So the answer to your question would be "no".

Also Plank's constant can be written in many different ways, and be different numbers. How would I know what number to use when I am talking of velocity in meters per second and mass in 1000x grams.

Since m/s and kg are MKS units for velocity and mass, respectively, it would only stand to reason that you use Planck's constant in MKS as well: [itex]h=6.63\times10^{-34}Js[/itex]
 
  • #3
Thank you Tom for the quick reply!

I will start tryng to bend my mind around relative wavelengths, and I looked up an MKS table, that is very helpful, thanks again!
 
  • #4
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the de broglie wavelength would have to be relative to the observer, just as all lengths are, otherwise different moving observers would see different interference patterns in a Young double slit experiment.
 
  • #5
peter0302 said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the de broglie wavelength would have to be relative to the observer, just as all lengths are,

Funny you should mention that, because I posted a thread on this very question some time ago.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=76060

The deBroglie wavelength in fact doesn't transform as a length. It transforms as an inverse length. That's because of the presence of the momentum in the denominator of the deBroglie relation. Momentum transforms just like length does.
 
  • #6
Tom Mattson said:
Funny you should mention that, because I posted a thread on this very question some time ago.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=76060

The deBroglie wavelength in fact doesn't transform as a length. It transforms as an inverse length. That's because of the presence of the momentum in the denominator of the deBroglie relation. Momentum transforms just like length does.

Can you explain what you mean by the difference between a length and an inverse length.

Despite the fact that the wavelength is inversly proportional to the velocity I still think that if you get a different wavelength you get a different length of the wave period.

AND if you change the velocity or anything in the denominator you get a different wavelength.

Soooo wouldn't that mean that the length of the period of the wave transforms based on observers?

I tried reading the other thread you posted but it started to get to complicated for me :)
 
  • #7
DeepGround said:
Can you explain what you mean by the difference between a length and an inverse length.

Simply put: If x is a length, then 1/x is an inverse length.

Despite the fact that the wavelength is inversly proportional to the velocity I still think that if you get a different wavelength you get a different length of the wave period.

Sure, the wavelength is different in different frames. But it's not enough to say that it's different. The real question is "how different?" How do you calculate the difference? As I said, it doesn't transform as a length, as one might naively expect. It transforms as an inverse length.
 

1. What is relative velocity?

Relative velocity is the velocity of an object or particle with respect to another object or frame of reference. It is the difference between the velocities of the two objects or frames of reference.

2. How is relative velocity calculated?

Relative velocity can be calculated by taking the difference between the velocities of the two objects or frames of reference. This can be done by subtracting the initial velocity of the second object from the initial velocity of the first object.

3. What is De Broglie's theory?

De Broglie's theory, also known as the wave-particle duality theory, states that particles, such as electrons, exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior. This theory was proposed by Louis de Broglie in 1924 and is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics.

4. How does De Broglie's theory relate to relative velocity?

De Broglie's theory is important in understanding the behavior of particles with respect to relative velocity. According to this theory, particles have a wavelength associated with them, and this wavelength changes depending on the relative velocity between the particles and the observer. This phenomenon is known as the "de Broglie wavelength."

5. How is De Broglie's theory used in modern science?

De Broglie's theory has had a significant impact on modern science, particularly in the fields of quantum mechanics and particle physics. It has been used to explain various phenomena, such as diffraction of electrons, and has also been applied in the development of technologies such as electron microscopy and particle accelerators.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
5
Views
754
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
575
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
6
Views
5K
Back
Top