Chances of two people having the same DNA?

  • Thread starter Superposed_Cat
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Chances Dna
In summary, DNA profiling is a process of analyzing genetic material to identify a person. It is used to convict criminals, to determine the identity of a deceased person, and to identify a person who has been kidnapped. However, DNA profiling is not always reliable, and it is possible for two people to have the same DNA even if they are unrelated.
  • #1
Superposed_Cat
388
5
There are only a finite number of combinations of DNA that one can have while still being human so my question is what are the chances of two people having the same DNA?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #3
UltrafastPED said:
Here they say 1 in 10^9, excluding identical (monozygotic) twins:
http://dnafingerprinting19.tripod.com/

This article goes into the details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_profiling
But dna fingerprintting is done only at a few loci (edit-13 it seems for CODIS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_profiling ) Just for fun-
Going solely by wiki searches and high school math-
Assumption-1) individuals are unrelated.
2) All neucleotides are equally likely for a particular position. (don't know if that's valid...screws up the gene pool big time...)
3x10^9 base pairs
99.9% of these are same
3x10^8 base pairs
There are 3 nucleotides GTA
Ways of arranging three nucleotides in 3x10^8 long sequence=
3x10^8!/g!t!a!
Where g+t+a=3x10^8
The equation has ##\binom {3*10^8 +2}{2}## integer solutions.
4.5*10^16
Let a solution be ##(g_i , t_i , a_i)##
So-
##{\sum^{4.5*10^{16}}_{i}} ( 3x10^8!/g_i!t_i!a_i!)##Don't know if it can be simplified through math further...but probability should be somewhere around 1 by more than 1 billion*...(too lazy to code Mathematica...don't know if its even possible...anyway computer's freaking slow...would take ages to cough up an answer for a calculation of this scale)

EDIT: mmm...interesting article...
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/20/local/me-dna20
-slightly biased arguments but seems worth scrutiny...
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Enigman said:
...but probability should be somewhere around 1 by more than 1 billion*...

Which is what it said in the references provided above ... though if the 13 loci are treated as independent, larger values are obtained. The Wikipedia article provides details as to why these larger numbers are not reliable.


Enigman said:
mmm...interesting article...
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/20/local/me-dna20
-slightly biased arguments but seems worth scrutiny...

I am white, mostly of northern and western European descent, but with some Lakota blood; I also have black and oriental relatives of various shades ... just because two people look different does not mean that they are not related!

Besides, identity requires 13 matches, not 9. So this article appears to be a defense lawyer type attack on the general validity of DNA profiling. The actual weaknesses are in the areas of contamination (see Wikipedia article again), and circumstances. There are many reasons why DNA may be present ... good police work will provide more evidence such as means, motive, and opportunity - without these any case is weak.

The long history of fingerprint identification has similar issues: how did the fingerprint get there? If it appears on a cartridge shell found at the scene of the crime the next question should be: is this the home of the person who owns the gun which fired it? Is this the weapon involved in the crime? Was the incident a crime? Thus the fingerprint alone, nor the associated DNA are insufficient evidence.
 
  • #5
Are fingerprints enough?
 
  • #6
Superposed_Cat said:
Are fingerprints enough?

Enough for what? Having known several sets of identical twins, I would say that neither DNA or fingerprints would have been enough for them. Having known them fairly well, I could also conclude that if one was involved, so was they other ... so in that case either _might_ be enough, but the circumstances also need to be considered: method, motive, opportunity.

Read any Sherlock Holmes story ...
 
  • #8
By sequencing the DNA from various individuals, scientists have found 15 million single nucleotide polymorphisms, 1 million short insertions and deletions, and 20,000 structural variants (The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium). Assuming each of these sites of variation has only two alleles and that none are synthetically lethal, this puts an estimate of the possible combinations from randomly assorting these variants at 2^(1.6x10^6) or 10^480000.
 
  • #9
UltrafastPED said:
with regard to said:
The men matched at nine of the 13 locations on chromosomes, or loci, commonly used to distinguish people.

The FBI estimated the odds of unrelated people sharing those genetic markers to be as remote as 1 in 113 billion. But the mug shots of the two felons suggested that they were not related: One was black, the other white
.Besides, identity requires 13 matches, not 9.
Actually many cases are such that where only a partial match is possible due to degradation.
And that's acceptable in court :frown:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_pr...vidence_of_partial_or_incomplete_DNA_profiles
UltrafastPED said:
Enough for what? Having known several sets of identical twins, I would say that neither DNA or fingerprints would have been enough for them.
Actually fingerprints are different for identical twins (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin#Genetic_and_epigenetic_similarity) and DNA might be different too (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=identical-twins-genes-are-not-identical)
Having known them fairly well, I could also conclude that if one was involved, so was they other ... so in that case either _might_ be enough,
Er...sorry :confused:? How does a character witness implicate one twin with the other?
Read any Sherlock Holmes story ...
Read only Doyle's; others are pure rubbish...Eg. http://www.youngsherlock.com/
:tongue:
UltrafastPED said:
Here is a conviction with no fingerprints or DNA, but only one person's eye witness testimony:

http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-innocence-hearing-20131108,0,5797031.story#axzz2kAA8kk7Q

When the police and prosecutors want to close a case, they may go too far ... who is watching the watchers?
A case illustrating the opposite: conviction based only on DNA evidence presented (fallaciously according to http://plus.maths.org/content/os/issue55/features/dnacourt/index but I don't think the 'correct' interpretation would have affected much.) and all other evidence supporting innocence:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Adams
 

What is DNA and why is it important?

DNA, or deoxyribonucleic acid, is the genetic material that carries the instructions for the development and functioning of all living organisms. It is made up of a unique sequence of nucleotides, which determine an individual's physical traits and characteristics. DNA is important because it allows for the passing down of genetic information from one generation to the next and plays a crucial role in evolution and the diversity of life on Earth.

How similar is human DNA?

Human DNA is remarkably similar among individuals, with a 99.9% similarity between any two people. This similarity is due to the fact that all humans share a common ancestor and have evolved from the same basic genetic blueprint. However, the remaining 0.1% of differences is what makes individuals unique and accounts for variations in physical traits and susceptibility to diseases.

What are the chances of two people having the same DNA?

The chances of two people having the exact same DNA are incredibly low, even among identical twins. This is because DNA is made up of over 3 billion nucleotide base pairs, and the likelihood of two individuals having the exact same sequence of these base pairs is extremely rare. However, there is a higher chance of individuals sharing certain genetic similarities due to common ancestry or familial relationships.

Can DNA tests determine if two people are related?

Yes, DNA tests can determine if two people are related by comparing their genetic profiles. These tests look for similarities and differences in the genetic code and can determine the likelihood of a biological relationship between two individuals. This is commonly used in paternity or ancestry testing.

How is DNA used in criminal investigations?

DNA is a powerful tool in criminal investigations, as it can be used to identify suspects or link individuals to a crime scene. DNA evidence is collected from sources such as blood, hair, or saliva, and is compared to a database of known DNA profiles. If a match is found, it can provide strong evidence linking a suspect to a crime and is often used to secure convictions in court.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
3
Views
878
Replies
3
Views
917
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
935
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
593
Back
Top