Register to reply

Yield question

by Big-Daddy
Tags: yield
Share this thread:
Big-Daddy
#1
Aug20-13, 12:04 PM
P: 343
If I want to calculate the number of moles ratio of reactants which, in a reversible reaction of equilibrium constant K, will give me a certain yield 'f', what is the mathematical definition of the yield in this case?

For instance, in the reaction A + B ⇔ C + D, let's say we can denote extent by ΔA such that K=(C0-ΔA)*(D0-ΔA)/((A0+ΔA)*(B0+ΔA)). Then is yield f=-ΔA/A0 (i.e. 90% yield would suggest that ΔA=-0.9*A0)? The problem becomes that then this is not 90% of everything, because B0 may not be the same as A0, in which case 90% of B0 would not have been converted, only 90% of A0. And if this "90% yield" was done with ΔB instead then our definition would involve 90% of B0 being converted but not 90% of A0, which provides two conflicting understandings of the "90% yield" statement.
Phys.Org News Partner Chemistry news on Phys.org
Ice cream goes Southern, okra extracts may increase shelf-life
The fluorescent fingerprint of plastics
Researchers develop models to study polyelectrolytes, including DNA and RNA
Yanick
#2
Aug21-13, 08:20 AM
P: 380
You have to take into account the limiting reagent. If you have 1 mol of A and 2 mol of B in a flask and the reaction is allowed to go to completion you will get 100% yield if you have (at the end) 0 mol of A, 1 mol of B, 1 mol of C and 1 mol of D. If you instead get something like 0.5 mol of C/D then your yield is 50% etc.

Wiki is great.
Big-Daddy
#3
Aug21-13, 10:46 AM
P: 343
Ok so "90% yield" means "90% of the number of moles of the limiting reagent (i.e. whichever of the reactants has the smallest ratio of number of moles/coefficient in the reaction) were transferred out to products, leaving 10% of the number of moles of that reagent".

So if a question says "work out the initial mass ratio of reactants that will produce a 90% yield" for a reaction aA + bB + cC -> products, there are actually 3 ratios that will work - one found by saying that C is the limiting reagent (so ΔC=-0.90*C0), one by saying A is the limiting reagent (ΔA=-0.90*A0) and one by saying B is the limiting reagent (ΔB=-0.90*B0). The higher the stoichiometric coefficient and Mr for the limiting reagent you choose, the lower the mass ratio (of each non-limiting reagent to the limiting reagent) will turn out to be (by comparison to the mass ratios found by considering the other reactants as limiting reagents).

Yanick
#4
Aug21-13, 07:02 PM
P: 380
Yield question

Quote Quote by Big-Daddy View Post
Ok so "90% yield" means "90% of the number of moles of the limiting reagent (i.e. whichever of the reactants has the smallest ratio of number of moles/coefficient in the reaction) were transferred out to products, leaving 10% of the number of moles of that reagent".
No. The limiting reagent is not the reactant with the smallest stoichiometric coefficient. Consider your above equation with a = 5 and b = 1, and you mix 2 mol of A and 10 mol of B. Surely the B is not limiting?

Quote Quote by Big-Daddy View Post
So if a question says "work out the initial mass ratio of reactants that will produce a 90% yield" for a reaction aA + bB + cC -> products, there are actually 3 ratios that will work - one found by saying that C is the limiting reagent (so ΔC=-0.90*C0), one by saying A is the limiting reagent (ΔA=-0.90*A0) and one by saying B is the limiting reagent (ΔB=-0.90*B0).
To know the mass ratio you'd need knowledge of the molecular weight of each reactant.

Also, the way I think about yield, you cannot MAKE the yield different by changing the limiting reagent. The yield of a reaction considers a theoretical yield which predicts how much you get if the reaction proceeded completely. Maybe you can take the equilibrium constant into account, if known, and calculate a theoretical yield from that but I am not certain that that is actually done (it seems redundant to me to do that). Regardless, if you change the limiting reagent you change the theoretical yield as well. So you cannot change the yield of a reaction by changing how much of each reagent you add.

Changing yield usually involves playing with the conditions of the reaction. For example, in reactions with small equilibrium constants, you can change the amount of reactants/products, temperature, pressure etc. This is frequently done in an effort to drive certain reactions in certain directions.

Quote Quote by Big-Daddy View Post
The higher the stoichiometric coefficient and Mr for the limiting reagent you choose, the lower the mass ratio (of each non-limiting reagent to the limiting reagent) will turn out to be (by comparison to the mass ratios found by considering the other reactants as limiting reagents).
I don't exactly understand what you mean here. What is Mr?
Big-Daddy
#5
Aug21-13, 08:52 PM
P: 343
Quote Quote by Yanick View Post
No. The limiting reagent is not the reactant with the smallest stoichiometric coefficient. Consider your above equation with a = 5 and b = 1, and you mix 2 mol of A and 10 mol of B. Surely the B is not limiting?
As I said, "smallest ratio of number of moles/coefficient in the reaction". Maybe I could have been clearer. Whichever of the reactants has a smaller value of n[Species]/v[Species] where v[Species] is the stoichiometric coefficient of that species in the reaction and n[Species] is the number of moles of that species present, is the limiting reagent. Ok?

Quote Quote by Yanick View Post
Also, the way I think about yield, you cannot MAKE the yield different by changing the limiting reagent. The yield of a reaction considers a theoretical yield which predicts how much you get if the reaction proceeded completely. Maybe you can take the equilibrium constant into account, if known, and calculate a theoretical yield from that but I am not certain that that is actually done (it seems redundant to me to do that). Regardless, if you change the limiting reagent you change the theoretical yield as well. So you cannot change the yield of a reaction by changing how much of each reagent you add.

Changing yield usually involves playing with the conditions of the reaction. For example, in reactions with small equilibrium constants, you can change the amount of reactants/products, temperature, pressure etc. This is frequently done in an effort to drive certain reactions in certain directions.
This is an equilibrium question. So when they say "work out the initial mass ratio of reactants that will produce a 90% yield", they are asking you to work out m[Reactant]/m[Limiting Reagent] which will produce a "90% yield". Originally my question was, what mathematically is this "90% yield". But now I think I have my answer: it is the fraction of number of moles of the limiting reagent which is transferred out. In the equilibrium calculation, ΔA=-yield*A0 where A0 is the initial number of moles of A.

Quote Quote by Yanick View Post
I don't exactly understand what you mean here. What is Mr?
Mr is molecular weight. What I am saying here is making the prediction that choosing as your limiting reagent a higher Mr reactant with a higher stoichiometric coefficient in the reaction will end up giving you a lower mass ratio of m[Reactant]/m[Limiting Reagent] where m[Reactant] is any one of the other reactants besides the limiting reagent. Do you agree?
Yanick
#6
Aug27-13, 10:17 AM
P: 380
Sorry, been really busy lately and haven't had much chance to play on PF.

Very quickly, everything you have written makes sense but I'm not quite sure that yield is calculated in that way. I think yield assumes the reaction goes to completion, then when you have done the actual experiment you figure out how much product you actually made and do actual/theoretical ratio.

Then again I only ever really see yield discussed in synthesis type work and I never paid much attention to how they actually calculate it, I've always assumed that yield means actual/theoretical where theoretical = to completion. Maybe someone with more experience can answer definitely on this issue.

What you are talking about above (namely the ΔA) is called extent of reaction, you can google it to see how it can be used to get some useful information.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Tresca yield question? Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 0
Yield stress from tensile test and yield stress from hardness tests Mechanical Engineering 1
Specific Yield Strength Question for A572 material Materials & Chemical Engineering 0
Simple question about the yield points of metals Materials & Chemical Engineering 1
Theoretical Yield, Molar Mass, and Percent Yield Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1