Is the Radial/Transverse coordinate system a non-inertial reference frame ?

In summary, the block slides away due to its inertia even though there are no radial forces acting on it.
  • #1
ezadam
21
0
Hey guys,

I am having some problems with the concept of inertial/non-inertial frames of reference and their applications in engineering dynamics. So I've learned that a given frame of reference is defined to be non-inertial when something in the studied system can only be explained through fictitious forces such as the Centrifugal one.

Now, let's take as an example the motion of a block that can slide freely on a frictionless arm that rotates in a horizontal planewith a constant rate over a hinge. Here's a sketch of what I'm talking about:

34quyah.jpg


So if we look into the radial direction of the block's motion, we find that there is no force acting in such a direction and thus accordingly, the block should theoretically not move in the radial direction. Surprisingly, that is not what happens as the block slides away due to its inertia.

Now how come does that happen if there are no radial forces ? Does that mean (according to my initial definition) that I should have accounted for some centrifugal force and thus that my somewhat rough force analysis should be based on a non-inertial frame of reference, ergo that radial/transverse force analysis is not an inertial reference frame ? Or do I have some huge misconception about the issue ?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hey ezadam! :smile:
ezadam said:
So if we look into the radial direction of the block's motion, we find that there is no force acting in such a direction and thus accordingly, the block should theoretically not move in the radial direction. Surprisingly, that is not what happens as the block slides away due to its inertia.

Now how come does that happen if there are no radial forces ? Does that mean (according to my initial definition) that I should have accounted for some centrifugal force and thus that my somewhat rough force analysis should be based on a non-inertial frame of reference, ergo that radial/transverse force analysis is not an inertial reference frame ? Or do I have some huge misconception about the issue ?

you can use either an inertial frame or a rotating frame

in an inertial frame, there is no radial force, so the radial acceleration must be zero, so r'' must be positive …

since radial acceleration = r'' - ω2r :wink:

in a rotating frame, there is a centrifugal force ω2r, so r'' = ω2r
 
  • #3
Thanks for the reply tiny-tim :)

The fact that in an inertial frame, [itex]\ddot{r}[/itex] is positive is what bothers me ... How can the block, physically speaking, move if there is no force responsible for its radial motion ? I understand your point mathematically but I still have some trouble understanding it intuitively :/

And also, what is the meaning of the block having a zero radial acceleration component while it is still moving radially ? Again, the mathematics of it make sense to me, but its physics is what confuses me the most ... What is the real meaning of radial acceleration ?
 
  • #4
ezadam said:
And also, what is the meaning of the block having a zero radial acceleration component while it is still moving radially ? Again, the mathematics of it make sense to me, but its physics is what confuses me the most ... What is the real meaning of radial acceleration ?

sorry :redface:, you're going to have to convince yourself on this one …

try drawing velocity vectors :wink:
 
  • #5
Yeah I somehow pushed myself to understand it :) It's just that it's the first time that in a physics/mechanics course, I am exposed to a such an explicit expression of the effect of inertia on the kinematics of a certain body. Thanks for your help !
 

1. What is a non-inertial reference frame?

A non-inertial reference frame is a coordinate system in which Newton's laws of motion do not hold true. In other words, an object in a non-inertial reference frame will appear to experience forces even when there are no external forces acting on it.

2. Is the radial/transverse coordinate system a common example of a non-inertial reference frame?

Yes, the radial/transverse coordinate system is a common example of a non-inertial reference frame. This coordinate system is often used in situations involving rotation or circular motion, where the direction of motion is constantly changing.

3. How does the Coriolis force relate to the radial/transverse coordinate system?

The Coriolis force is a fictitious force that appears in a rotating reference frame, such as the radial/transverse coordinate system. It is responsible for the deflection of objects moving in a rotating frame and is dependent on the object's velocity and angular velocity of the frame.

4. Can the radial/transverse coordinate system be used in all situations?

No, the radial/transverse coordinate system is only applicable in situations involving rotation or circular motion. In situations where the motion is linear or does not involve rotation, a different coordinate system, such as the Cartesian coordinate system, should be used.

5. How does the concept of inertia relate to non-inertial reference frames?

Inertia is the tendency of an object to resist changes in its state of motion. In non-inertial reference frames, this concept is still relevant, but Newton's laws of motion do not hold true. This means that the object may appear to experience forces even when there are no external forces acting on it, due to the effects of the non-inertial frame.

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
820
Replies
2
Views
647
  • Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top