Longitudinal and Transverse Mass

In summary, the conversation is about the relationship between force and acceleration, specifically in a relativistic context. The speaker disagreed with a comment about F=ma for relativistic mass and provided a link to a web page with a derivation of the correct relationship. Another person suggests that although F=ma is still true, the force applied to a moving mass is reduced due to the speed of light.
  • #1
pmb_phy
2,952
1
I don't recall what thread it was in but there was a comment that F = ma for a relativistic mass. I stated it was incorrect but did not provide a proof since it was a bit involved and too mathy for latex so instead of doing the latex out I made a new web page. For the derivation of the correct relationship between force and acceleration please see

http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/long_trans_mass.htm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi, Petey.

Another way of looking at it is that F=ma is still true but the force actually applied to the moving mass is diminished. Force can only be delivered at the speed of light.

{;>)]
 
  • #3


Thank you for providing this resource on the correct relationship between force and acceleration in the context of relativistic mass. It is important to have a clear understanding of this concept, as it is often misunderstood or misrepresented.

As you have explained in your webpage, the concept of relativistic mass is a result of applying classical mechanics equations to objects moving at speeds close to the speed of light. However, this approach can lead to inconsistencies and confusion, as you have pointed out.

The correct relationship between force and acceleration in the context of relativistic mass is given by the equation F = dp/dt, where p is the momentum of the object. This takes into account the changing mass of the object as it approaches the speed of light, and is consistent with the principles of special relativity.

It is important to note that while the concept of relativistic mass may be useful in certain situations, it is not a fundamental property of an object and should not be confused with its rest mass. The rest mass of an object remains constant regardless of its speed, while the relativistic mass depends on the frame of reference and the speed of the object.

Thank you for clarifying this concept and providing a thorough explanation of the correct relationship between force and acceleration in the context of relativistic mass. Your webpage is a valuable resource for anyone seeking a deeper understanding of this topic.
 

1. What is the difference between longitudinal and transverse mass?

Longitudinal mass refers to the mass of an object in the direction of its motion, while transverse mass refers to the mass of an object perpendicular to its motion.

2. How is longitudinal mass measured?

Longitudinal mass can be measured using a variety of techniques, including calculations based on an object's velocity, acceleration, and force, as well as experiments such as inertial balance tests.

3. What is an example of an object with high transverse mass?

A spinning top is an example of an object with high transverse mass, as its mass is distributed around its rotating axis, making it more difficult to change its direction of motion.

4. Can an object have different longitudinal and transverse masses?

Yes, an object can have different longitudinal and transverse masses, as the distribution of mass can vary depending on the direction of motion.

5. How does an object's longitudinal and transverse mass affect its motion?

An object's longitudinal and transverse mass can affect its motion by determining how easily it can change its direction or speed, as well as its stability and ability to resist external forces.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top