Work-Energy Theorem question with not much detail to work with

In summary: A point where it has moved a certain distance? Or perhaps you're asking for the total work done on the puck from the start till it stops moving?In summary, according to the work-energy theorem, the net work done by all the forces acting on an object equals the change in its kinetic energy. In this scenario, the hockey stick does work on the puck, causing it to accelerate from rest to a final velocity. The work done by the stick is equal to the change in the puck's kinetic energy, which is calculated using the formula KE = 1/2mv^2. The initial kinetic energy of the puck is 0, and the final kinetic energy is 1/2mv^2, where
  • #1
tbyrne
7
0

Homework Statement


Suppose a hockey puck of mass m is at rest on the ice. A surly Canadian hits the puck and sends it sailing across the ice at velocity v. According to the work-energy theorem, how much work did the player's stick do on the puck?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, what does the Work-Energy theorem state?
 
  • #3
It states "the net work done by all the forces acting on a body equals the change in its kinetic energy".
I don't get it though, how does that help me solve this problem?
 
  • #4
tbyrne said:
It states "the net work done by all the forces acting on a body equals the change in its kinetic energy".
I don't get it though, how does that help me solve this problem?
You want the work done, so see if you can figure out the change in the puck's KE. (You can't figure it out numerically, of course. Just symbolically.)

Initial KE of puck = ??
Final KE of puck = ??
 
  • #5
ΔKE = KE final - KE initial = 1/2 mv2 final - 1/2 mv2 initial
Right? So, does this help me? What does that have to do with the hockey stick?
 
  • #6
tbyrne said:
ΔKE = KE final - KE initial = 1/2 mv2 final - 1/2 mv2 initial
Right?
Sure. So what's the initial speed and KE of the puck?

tbyrne said:
What does that have to do with the hockey stick?
The hockey stick is the object that did the work on the puck.
 
  • #7
Well?? Initial speed is 0, I think, and KE is ?? I don't know, I am so confused. I am trying, but not getting it...
 
  • #8
Does W=Delta E have anything to do with it?
 
  • #9
tbyrne said:
Initial speed is 0, I think,
Right. It starts out at rest.
and KE is ??
How do you calculate KE? (You just gave the formula above.)
 
  • #10
1/2 mv2 final-1/2 mv2 initial
But how do I do that without any numbers?
 
  • #11
tbyrne said:
1/2 mv2 final-1/2 mv2 initial
But how do I do that without any numbers?
Using the definition of KE = 1/2mv2, what's the initial KE? The initial velocity is 0, so what's the KE?

For the final velocity, what do they tell you the speed is? (Again, no numbers, just symbols.) So what's the final KE?
 
  • #12
So, I guess initial KE would be 0 as well?
The speed is v. So, the final KE would be v-0??
 
  • #13
tbyrne said:
So, I guess initial KE would be 0 as well?
Right! Since KE = 1/2m(speed)2, the initial KE = 1/2m(0)2 = 0
The speed is v. So, the final KE would be v-0??
No. What's the final KE given the speed is just v. (It's much easier than you think.)
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
Right! Since KE = 1/2m(speed)2, the initial KE = 1/2m(0)2 = 0

No. What's the final KE given the speed is just v. (It's much easier than you think.)

I thought initial speed should be the greatest since that's where the force is applied. Then once it stops then velocity is 0. Anyways the work done to do something will be equal to the energy change of an object be it KE, GPE or any forms of energy. Once it is used to work, then all that energy is 'channeled' to doing work. It is converted to work done by applied force so it covers all retardation such as friction or air resistance. Hence, that 1/2mv^2 is converted to work done by applied force to push the puck. However, the net work done is not equal to 1/2mv^2 due to the work done against friction.

Work done and energy are similar yet different. Similar in the sense that they have the same SI unit and magnitude. But different such that, at any point the puck has kinetic energy although lesser than at the original position. So using energy to explain the movement is like this: when the puck is first whacked, it has maximum kinetic energy. As it moves the kinetic energy of the puck reduces as energy is given off as heat and sound. Once all the energy is depleted, there is no more velocity, hence it stops moving. However, the work done explanation still holds true.

I hope this helps and if I'm wrong anywhere do point out my mistakes and correct them. Thanks for the help!
 
  • #15
sgstudent said:
I thought initial speed should be the greatest since that's where the force is applied. Then once it stops then velocity is 0.
We are talking about the interaction of the stick with the puck. When the stick first makes contact, the initial speed of the puck is zero. It accelerates to its final speed due to the work done by the stick. Once the puck leaves the stick, it remains moving at that final speed. (There are no dissipative forces to worry about.)

The work done equals the change in KE.
 
  • #16
Doc Al said:
We are talking about the interaction of the stick with the puck. When the stick first makes contact, the initial speed of the puck is zero. It accelerates to its final speed due to the work done by the stick. Once the puck leaves the stick, it remains moving at that final speed. (There are no dissipative forces to worry about.)

The work done equals the change in KE.

But am I right in the sense if I take the whole system where the puck eventually stops? So in this case is it right to say that you are going into the micro interaction where I'm taking before the puck gets hit and at the point where the puck is bring hit? So the gain in kinetic energy is 1/2m ^2?

Is this question too simplified, or can this question come out in the o levels? Thanks for the help!
 
  • #17
sgstudent said:
But am I right in the sense if I take the whole system where the puck eventually stops?
But you're changing the problem. (The original problem in this thread clearly asks for the work done by the stick when it hits the puck.) It sounds like you want to consider the puck starting from rest, getting hit by the stick, and then ending up at rest due to friction. In that case, what do you think the net work done is?
 
  • #18
Doc Al said:
But you're changing the problem. (The original problem in this thread clearly asks for the work done by the stick when it hits the puck.) It sounds like you want to consider the puck starting from rest, getting hit by the stick, and then ending up at rest due to friction. In that case, what do you think the net work done is?

I think it will be -1/2mv^2? Is this correct cos at the part where there is contact there is a maximum velocity. But then as you said there is 0 velocity at the start. So if I consider before I hit and until it stops then it will be zero. But if I consider it to be at the point when my stick hits the puck at the point where it is the maximum point then it will be -1/2mv^2?

I'm quite confused about this. Thanks for the help!
 
  • #19
sgstudent said:
I think it will be -1/2mv^2? Is this correct cos at the part where there is contact there is a maximum velocity. But then as you said there is 0 velocity at the start. So if I consider before I hit and until it stops then it will be zero. But if I consider it to be at the point when my stick hits the puck at the point where it is the maximum point then it will be -1/2mv^2?

I'm quite confused about this. Thanks for the help!
Please define the precise problem you wish to solve.

If you are solving the original problem discussed in this thread, then the work done by the stick will be ΔKE as the velocity of the puck goes from zero to v.
 

1. What is the Work-Energy Theorem?

The Work-Energy Theorem states that the work done on an object is equal to the change in its kinetic energy. In other words, the net work done on an object will result in a change in its velocity.

2. How is the Work-Energy Theorem applied in real-world situations?

The Work-Energy Theorem is commonly used in physics and engineering to analyze the motion of objects, such as cars, airplanes, and roller coasters. It helps to determine how much work is required to move an object from one point to another, as well as the resulting change in its kinetic energy.

3. Can the Work-Energy Theorem be used to calculate the work done by non-conservative forces?

Yes, the Work-Energy Theorem can be applied to both conservative and non-conservative forces. However, in the case of non-conservative forces, the work done is not solely responsible for the change in kinetic energy, as some of the work may be converted into other forms of energy.

4. How is the Work-Energy Theorem related to the Law of Conservation of Energy?

The Work-Energy Theorem is closely related to the Law of Conservation of Energy, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or converted. The Work-Energy Theorem allows us to analyze the transfer and conversion of energy in a system, as work done on an object will result in a change in its kinetic energy.

5. What are the limitations of the Work-Energy Theorem?

The Work-Energy Theorem assumes that the only forces acting on an object are external forces, and that these forces are constant. This may not always be the case in real-world situations, as there may be other forces present, such as friction or air resistance, that can affect the motion of an object. Additionally, the Work-Energy Theorem does not take into account the direction of motion, as it only considers the change in kinetic energy, not the direction of the velocity.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
416
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
953
Replies
11
Views
984
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
56
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top