Can Luminosity Give You a Star's Age?


by chefskitten
Tags: luminosity, star
chefskitten
chefskitten is offline
#1
Oct25-13, 09:33 PM
P: 2
You find two yellow stars at the same distance (but not in a binary system!). They have the same mass, but one is much more luminous than the other.
Which one is older?
Phys.Org News Partner Astronomy news on Phys.org
A star's early chemistry shapes life-friendly atmospheres
Unique pair of supermassive black holes in an ordinary galaxy discovered
Red stars and big bulges: How black holes shape galaxies
howabout1337
howabout1337 is offline
#2
Oct26-13, 10:58 AM
P: 16
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_age_estimation:
"As stars grow older, their luminosity increases at an appreciable rate"

So I would assume the more luminous one.
chefskitten
chefskitten is offline
#3
Oct27-13, 08:54 PM
P: 2
Thanks for your input howabout1337! That's what I was thinking, just wanted some confirmation

phinds
phinds is offline
#4
Oct27-13, 09:16 PM
PF Gold
phinds's Avatar
P: 5,718

Can Luminosity Give You a Star's Age?


I don't get it. How would you tell an old modest-sized star from a large younger star, both of which have the same luminosity?
Chronos
Chronos is offline
#5
Oct27-13, 10:46 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,185
The luminosity of a star is strongly dependent on mass, which is known as the mass-luminosity relationship. While the luminosity of a star does increase somewhat with age, the difference is small until it leaves the main sequence. It would be a wildly unreliable way to determine the age of a star.
Drakkith
Drakkith is offline
#6
Oct28-13, 01:35 AM
PF Gold
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,057
Quote Quote by phinds View Post
I don't get it. How would you tell an old modest-sized star from a large younger star, both of which have the same luminosity?
The more massive one has a different spectrum. It will be hotter, even if their luminosity is the same.
Drakkith
Drakkith is offline
#7
Oct28-13, 01:37 AM
PF Gold
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,057
Quote Quote by Chronos View Post
The luminosity of a star is strongly dependent on mass, which is known as the mass-luminosity relationship. While the luminosity of a star does increase somewhat with age, the difference is small until it leaves the main sequence. It would be a wildly unreliable way to determine the age of a star.
Do you know if this graph is accurate? This seems to be a pretty big change.
From here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Main_sequence

Vanadium 50
Vanadium 50 is offline
#8
Oct28-13, 08:16 PM
Mentor
Vanadium 50's Avatar
P: 15,625
It's at least approximately right. When I studied these things, the sun went off the main sequence a little sooner and more quickly (9.1 BY), but there's a factor of ~2 or so luminosity increase over the course of the main sequence.
Chronos
Chronos is offline
#9
Oct28-13, 10:00 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,185
When the sun first entered the main sequence, it was about 70% of its current luminosity. Over the next 4.5 billion years, it's luminosity is expected to increase by about 67%. I do not consider that enough of a luminosity difference to be useful to estimate the age of a star.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Writing: Input Wanted Star mass/luminosity for a given HZ Science Fiction Writing 30
Help with relative star flux and luminosity Introductory Physics Homework 5
How to change a star's luminosity Astrophysics 4
Luminosity of a star Astrophysics 5
Help to determine the luminosity of a star Introductory Physics Homework 5