If i were able to pause time

  • Thread starter jaydnul
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Time
In summary: If you were aiming at the crater Aristarchus, which is about 109,000 km from Earth, you would miss by about 262,000 meters. So even if you could magically teleport, you would still have a bit of a challenge in hitting your target.
  • #1
jaydnul
558
15
If i were able to pause time at this instant and travel anywhere in the universe, would the majority of it still be galaxies, like we see today (excluding dark matter and energy)? Take the Hubble deep field. Would the most distant galaxies we see in that picture still be galaxies at this instant in time, or have they most likely disbanded by now (i have no clue if disbanded is the correct word)?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
What you see right now is how it WAS when the light left it. The Hubble Deep Field is of galaxies that emitted the light we see some 12 or 13 billion years ago. If you could instantaneous be at one of them "now", it would have aged by that many years. Some would have likely merged.

What do you mean "excluding dark matter" ? If there were no dark matter there would not BE any galaxies, then or now.
 
  • #3
phinds said:
What you see right now is how it WAS when the light left it. The Hubble Deep Field is of galaxies that emitted the light we see some 12 or 13 billion years ago. If you could instantaneous be at one of them "now", it would have aged by that many years. Some would have likely merged.

What do you mean "excluding dark matter" ? If there were no dark matter there would not BE any galaxies, then or now.

Well when i said "majority of the universe", i was trying to refer to everything that's not dark matter or energy, even though its a small percentage of the total universe, 4 or so percent if I'm not mistaken. Probably a stupid thing to add, i can see how it could be confusing. Ignore that. So at this moment in time, we think that those distant galaxies have merged into fewer, larger galaxies?
 
  • #4
Some will have merged. Actually, I don't know enough cosmology to know how galaxies age. I would EXPECT them to still be there (other than merging) but again, I'm no expert.

Our own galaxy is about 13 billion years old give or take a few weeks and it shows no signs of going anywhere any time soon, other than an upcoming merge with Andromeda is a 4 or so billion years.
 
  • #5
phinds said:
Some will have merged. Actually, I don't know enough cosmology to know how galaxies age. I would EXPECT them to still be there (other than merging) but again, I'm no expert.

Our own galaxy is about 13 billion years old give or take a few weeks and it shows no signs of going anywhere any time soon, other than an upcoming merge with Andromeda is a 4 or so billion years.

Oh, ok. So one more question. Since there is no center of the universe, do we know what we would see if we were observing from the point of view of one of those distant galaxies?
 
  • #6
Pretty much exactly what we see from here except that we wouldn't see a Milky Way equivalent unless we were in one of those galaxies.

This of course means that we would see next to nothing since almost everything we see with the naked eye is IN the Milky Way.
 
  • #8
lundyjb said:
Oh, ok. So one more question. Since there is no center of the universe, do we know what we would see if we were observing from the point of view of one of those distant galaxies?

If we took our Hubble Space Telescope and made observations we would see something similar to what we see already. Billions upon billions of galaxies surrounding us in all directions. If you are inside a galaxy you would also see stars, nebula, etc.
 
  • #9
Phinds is correct. If you could magically transport instantaneously to a galaxy 12 billion light years distant, the universe would look like it does from our vantage point - 13.7 billion years old and homogenously filled with galaxies. Of course the star, or whatever you thought you were transporting to, would be long gone since all that stuff would have been on the move for 12 billion years. This is a problem with instantaneous transport. If you instantaneously transported to some apparent location on the moon, the moon will have moved about 1.3 seconds by the time you arrived. How far does the moon move in 1.3 seconds? That gets rather complicated. The moon has an orbital velocity of about 1 km/sec. OK, that doesn't sound too awful, you would only miss your target by about 1300 meters. But that isn't the end of the story. The moon orbits the Earth which orbits the sun. Orbital velocity of the Earth is about 28 km/sec. And the sun orbits the milky way at about 220 km/sec, and the milky way orbits the local group, and the local group orbits the Virgo supercluster, and so forth. Relative to the CMB, we are hurtling through space at around 600 km/sec. In other words, everything in the universe moves relatively quickly, and in complicated fashion in the mere span of 1.3 seconds. In terms of any absolute coordinate system, there is no telling where you might end up relative to your target on the moon. Depending on how the various directions of movement components conspire to shift things, you might rematerialize hundreds of kilometers below the surface of the moon, miss it entirely, or anything in between.
 
  • #10
lundyjb said:
If i were able to pause time at this instant and travel anywhere in the universe, would the majority of it still be galaxies, like we see today (excluding dark matter and energy)? Take the Hubble deep field. Would the most distant galaxies we see in that picture still be galaxies at this instant in time, or have they most likely disbanded by now (i have no clue if disbanded is the correct word)?

lundyjb said:
If i were able to pause time at this instant and travel anywhere in the universe, would the majority.

Hypothetically, If time is totally frozen. It's inconceivable to travel (We don't even know what will happen to 'a' space). All particles(universe) will be talking to your personal molecule shifting the excess energy around your atoms, trying to share energy with them and keep its electron, until it suddenly breaks up (i can only imagine how it plays but not sure about the visuals hehe). Or might behave differently.:shy:.

Anyways. Assuming they don't behave like that or you can contain that effect((Hypothe...-contained personal space = to creating a new universe)) and able to travel in some hypothetical space... Chronos has the approximation.
 

1. What would happen if I paused time?

If you were able to pause time, everything around you would freeze in place. All movement, including the movement of air molecules and light, would come to a halt. You would be the only one able to move and observe your surroundings.

2. How long could I pause time for?

There is no definitive answer to this question as it is purely hypothetical. It would depend on the limitations of your abilities and the reason for pausing time. Some suggest that pausing time for too long could have catastrophic consequences, while others believe it is possible to pause time indefinitely.

3. Would I age while time is paused?

Again, this would depend on the rules of your hypothetical ability. If time has truly stopped for everyone and everything except for you, then you would not age. However, if time is still passing for you, then you would continue to age while time is paused.

4. Could I interact with paused objects or people?

As you are the only one able to move while time is paused, you would be able to interact with the frozen objects and people around you. However, any interaction would be limited to physical actions, as communication would be impossible since sound waves would not be able to travel.

5. What would happen when I resume time?

Once you choose to resume time, everything would return to its normal state. Objects and people would continue their movement as if nothing had happened. If you had made any changes while time was paused, those changes would also take effect once time is resumed.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
566
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
985
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
24
Views
3K
Back
Top