Non-Adiabatic versus excited state

In summary, the conversation discusses the confusion between the terms "nonadiabatic" and "excited state" when referring to protons in a higher vibrating state. The speaker shares their understanding that for larger masses like protons, nonadiabatic processes are important in the relaxation of the excited state magnetization through interactions with the solvent and nearby molecules. They also provide a resource for a definition of these terms in the context of excited state systems.
  • #1
greisen
76
0
Hi,

I am reading about protons and their transfer mechanisms and often the words nonadiabatic and excited state are used in a way which confuses me.

If I have a proton in a higher vibrating state (E1) I would called that an excited state for the proton - is this also a non-adiabatic state for the proton?

Any help or advise appreciated.

Thanks in advance

Best
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I would think that for larger masses like the proton, non-adiabatic processes would be very important (relative to electronic excited states). In NMR, these non-adiabatic processes occur between the excited magnetic state of the proton and nearby (physically nearby) lattice. The relaxation of the excited state magnetizaton occurs through interaction with the solvent and other analyte molecules (the 'lattice') and through nearby (both physically and electronically) spin systems. These energy transfer mechanisms would be defined as non-adiabatic since they are intermolecular transfers of energy.

A good definition of 'non-adiabatic' and 'adiabatic' for excited state systems can be found here:

http://www.worldscibooks.com/phy_etextbook/4783/4783_chap1.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
regards,

A non-adiabatic state refers to a state in which the energy of a system is changing rapidly, typically due to some external force or interaction. An excited state, on the other hand, refers to a state in which the energy of a system is higher than its ground state. These two terms are often used in the context of proton transfer mechanisms, as you mentioned.

In the case of a proton in a higher vibrating state (E1), this can be considered an excited state for the proton since it has a higher energy compared to its ground state. However, whether it is also a non-adiabatic state would depend on the rate at which the energy is changing. If the energy is changing rapidly, then it could be considered non-adiabatic.

It is important to note that these are not mutually exclusive terms and a system can be both in an excited state and a non-adiabatic state at the same time. Additionally, the behavior of a system in an excited state can be affected by external forces, leading to non-adiabatic behavior.

I hope this helps clarify the difference between non-adiabatic and excited states in the context of proton transfer. Keep in mind that these terms can have slightly different meanings in other scientific fields, so it is always important to consider the specific context in which they are being used.
 

1. What is the difference between non-adiabatic and excited state?

Non-adiabatic refers to a process where the energy of a system changes rapidly, while excited state refers to a state where an atom or molecule has absorbed energy and is at a higher energy level than its ground state. Non-adiabatic processes can lead to excited states, but not all excited states are a result of non-adiabatic processes.

2. How are non-adiabatic and excited state related to each other?

Non-adiabatic processes can lead to transitions between different excited states, and these transitions can be accompanied by changes in the energy of the system. Additionally, non-adiabatic processes can also lead to the formation of new excited states. However, not all excited states are a result of non-adiabatic processes.

3. What are the implications of non-adiabatic versus excited state for chemical reactions?

Non-adiabatic processes can significantly impact the dynamics of a chemical reaction, as they can lead to changes in the energy of the system and the formation of new excited states. These changes can influence the overall outcome of the reaction, including the formation of different products or reaction pathways.

4. How do scientists study non-adiabatic versus excited state phenomena?

Scientists use a variety of experimental and theoretical methods to study non-adiabatic and excited state phenomena. This can include spectroscopy techniques to measure changes in energy levels, computational simulations to model the dynamics of these processes, and experiments to observe the outcomes of reactions under different conditions.

5. Can non-adiabatic processes be controlled or manipulated?

Yes, scientists have developed techniques to control and manipulate non-adiabatic processes, such as using laser pulses to induce transitions between different excited states. This allows for greater understanding and control of chemical reactions and can have practical applications in fields such as materials science and energy research.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
0
Views
815
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top