What Are the Potential Applications of Hafnium-Powered Reactions?

  • Thread starter Kojac
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Reactions
In summary,The article in Popular Science discussed how you can use gamma radiation to generate a lot of energy. Njorlok suggests using this energy to create a more efficient engine. However, there is no evidence to support the claims made in the article.
  • #1
Kojac
26
0
Don't know if this is even the right place for this, but reading Popular Science? i think... anyway, they mentioned the fact that if you bombard Hafnium 178 with x-ray radiation, you get about a 50-60 fold return in gamma radiation. I don't know where to classify that...nuclear reaction? but it seems to me that you could use it pretty much anywhere. even in a modified internal combustion engine, where you'd simply put water that has hafnium ions in it into the piston, hit it with x-rays, get your gamma ray production, causing steam to force your piston up and then venting it... have the right concentrations of hafnium, recycle your water, and it looks like you've got an engine with a good power source...maybe even replacing gasoline? i dunno. forums are for comments. Hit me! (with your comments)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Gamma rays are nasty stuff. You don't want to be anywhere near something producing them without a nice lead shield.
 
  • #3
Nobody else has yet been able to recreate the results of the experiment.
 
  • #4
In any case you can do the math; just supposse that hafnium splits (fission) to the best combination available and check the mass/energy differences.
 
  • #5
Also, wouldn't you need a swimming pool to efficiently collect the gamma rays? I expect the mean path of gamma rays in water is very long.

Njorl
 
  • #6
ok, I'm sticking w/ the gamma/typical engine concept just for ease. suppose you shield each piston, I'm wondering if you could dissolve the hafnium AND another substance(s) in the water, allowing for more efficient collection. could you still utilize the gamma radiation? a lot of ifs, i know, but if it worked...

ok, so you shield every piston. that means the shielding material is dense enough to absorb the radiation in the first place, and that the energy will be released into IT. it's probably not ultra efficient, but it may be efficient enough IN THE SMALL AREA OF A PISTON to flash boil the water and heat whatever gas is in there enough to slam that piston up. you'd just need a tad more hafnium for the energy then you'd need for the swimming pool collection.
-now you guys get to correct me. lol

oh, and i don't think hafnium will split like a typical fissionable material, it is after all what they use as dampening rods IN a fission reaction to stop/slow/control it.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Kojac said:
ok, I'm sticking w/ the gamma/typical engine concept just for ease. suppose you shield each piston, I'm wondering if you could dissolve the hafnium AND another substance(s) in the water, allowing for more efficient collection. could you still utilize the gamma radiation? a lot of ifs, i know, but if it worked...

ok, so you shield every piston. that means the shielding material is dense enough to absorb the radiation in the first place, and that the energy will be released into IT. it's probably not ultra efficient, but it may be efficient enough IN THE SMALL AREA OF A PISTON to flash boil the water and heat whatever gas is in there enough to slam that piston up. you'd just need a tad more hafnium for the energy then you'd need for the swimming pool collection.
-now you guys get to correct me. lol

oh, and i don't think hafnium will split like a typical fissionable material, it is after all what they use as dampening rods IN a fission reaction to stop/slow/control it.

They use Halfnium because it is an excellent neutron absorber. Halfnium can absorb 6 neutrons and the daughter particles also absorb neutrons. I believe each atom in a Halfnium rod can absorb up to 10 neutrons including the daughter particles (its been a long long time since I last made big atoms into little atoms).

What you're proposing is a system that requires a halfnium atom absorb a high energy gamma not a neutron. I haven't read the work in question but I do recall hearing something to this effect and the energy release was do to a halfnium fission which sounds reasonable. If the Hf didn't fission then where would the extra energy come from?
 
  • #8
no, no fission. the energy is released through a change in energy levels...if I've understood it correctly.
http://www.utdallas.edu/research/quantum/Tutorial.htm

this one's a bit simpler and outlines the concepts.
http://www.utdallas.edu/research/quantum/cqeseg3.htm#CONC
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Kojac said:
no, no fission. the energy is released through a change in energy levels...if I've understood it correctly.
]

Correct; its an excited state that supposedly can be induced (by x-rays) to emit gammas. However, forget the more efficient steam engines stuff; we're talking awesome weapons potential here! :eek: Da, you engineers are all alike... :rofl: :biggrin:

P.S. Nice descriptive sites; :wink: However, there's been little reported independent evidence to collaborate the effect.
 
Last edited:

1. What is hafnium?

Hafnium is a chemical element with the symbol Hf and atomic number 72. It is a lustrous, silvery-gray metal commonly used in nuclear reactors and other high-temperature applications.

2. How is hafnium used in power reactions?

Hafnium is used as a neutron absorber in nuclear reactors to control the rate of nuclear fission. It is also used in fuel rod cladding and control rods to prevent corrosion and improve the efficiency of the reactor.

3. What makes hafnium a good choice for power reactions?

Hafnium has a high melting point and excellent thermal stability, making it suitable for use in extreme temperature environments. It also has a high cross-section for neutron capture, making it an effective neutron absorber in reactors.

4. Are there any safety concerns with hafnium-powered reactions?

Hafnium has a low rate of nuclear reactions and is not easily fissile, so it poses minimal risk for nuclear accidents. However, it is highly toxic and must be handled carefully to avoid health hazards.

5. Is hafnium a sustainable energy source?

No, hafnium is not a naturally occurring element and must be produced through a complex process, making it a non-renewable resource. Its use in power reactions is also limited, as it is primarily used in nuclear reactors which have their own environmental and safety concerns.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
11
Views
14K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
993
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top