Mass-Energy Conversion in Bound Systems

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of mass-energy equivalence in relation to the release of a photon when an electron and proton come together into a bound state. One explanation suggests that the extra rest mass of the particles is converted into energy, while the other suggests that the potential energy between the particles is released as a photon. Both explanations are valid, with the second one stating that the bound system actually has less mass than its constituent particles. The possibility of measuring this difference in mass is also mentioned.
  • #1
K8181
19
0
I have a fundamental question. I am reading this modern physics book, and it says that an electron and a proton that are released and come together into a bound state release a photon. Fine. But the explanation given is that the sum of the individual masses of the proton and electron is greater than the mass of the bound system, and that the extra rest mass was converted to energy in the release of the photon. I am confused because it seems that an equally good explanation is that the electron and proton have a potential energy when they are apart, and it is this energy that is released as a photon. Here there would be no conversion of mass into energy needed to save conservation of energy. Does the bound system behave as though it has less mass than the constituent particles, or is the second explanation just as good? Please help. :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Both descriptions are correct, they just focus on different things.
K8181 said:
Does the bound system behave as though it has less mass than the constituent particles, or is the second explanation just as good?
It doesn't just "behave as though", it actually has less mass. You can put it on a scale to check. Well, there will be experimental difficulties, but at least it is possible in principle.
 

What is the concept of conversion of mass to energy?

The concept of conversion of mass to energy is based on Albert Einstein's famous equation, E=mc^2, which states that mass and energy are interchangeable and one can be converted into the other. This means that a certain amount of mass can be converted into a certain amount of energy, and vice versa.

How does the conversion of mass to energy occur?

The conversion of mass to energy occurs through the process of nuclear reactions, such as nuclear fission and fusion. In these reactions, the nucleus of an atom is either split or combined with another nucleus, releasing a tremendous amount of energy in the form of heat, light, and radiation.

What are some real-life applications of conversion of mass to energy?

The most well-known and significant application of conversion of mass to energy is in nuclear power plants, where nuclear fission reactions are used to generate electricity. Additionally, nuclear weapons also utilize this concept to release a large amount of energy in the form of an explosion.

Can the conversion of mass to energy be reversed?

Yes, the conversion of mass to energy can be reversed through the process of nuclear fusion. In this process, two lighter nuclei are combined to form a heavier nucleus, releasing a large amount of energy in the process. This is the same process that powers the sun and other stars.

Is the conversion of mass to energy a sustainable source of energy?

While nuclear power is a highly efficient and reliable source of energy, it is not considered a sustainable source since it relies on the use of finite resources such as uranium for fuel. Additionally, the disposal of nuclear waste also poses environmental and health risks. However, research is ongoing to develop more sustainable methods of nuclear energy production.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top