Follow-up and pipeline: definitions

In summary, during the conversation, the speakers discussed the meanings of technical terms in astronomy such as 'follow-up' and 'pipeline'. They also discussed the differences between 'follow-up' observations and standard surveys, as well as the use of 'pipeline' in data reduction processes. The conversation concluded with a request for a simple example of data reduction and confirmation that FITS files can be used at all stages of data processing.
  • #1
RHK
64
0
Hi
I am looking for the actual meaning of some technical/procedure words in astronomy, like:
1) Follow-up
2) Pipeline

As far I know, the follow up is the observation of an object or a field for a given amount of time, isn't it? Then, if it is, what's the difference with "standard" surveys?

On the other hand, the pipeline is "just" a term to indicate the data reduction, like what?

Any suggestion is really appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
RHK said:
1) Follow-up
Follow-up refers to 'follow-up' observations. This term is often used in the context of surveys where objects are initially detected, then require 'follow-up' by a more sensitive instrument or different type of instrument (usually a spectrometer)

RHK said:
2) Pipeline
As you say, 'pipeline' generally refers to the process of data-reduction. More specifically it usually refers to a well established, largely (or entirely) automated series of data-reduction processes associated with a particular instrument or type of data. This 'pipeline' is generally applied to virtually every element of data obtained through the given instrument. The 'pipeline' generally contains all of the basic operations that aren't especially interested to researchers. Sometimes the following stages of processing are referred to as 'post-processing' and are usually more complicated, and more situation specific --- thus requiring more involvement of the researcher.
 
  • #3
Thank you. Some other questions:

zhermes said:
Follow-up refers to 'follow-up' observations. This term is often used in the context of surveys where objects are initially detected, then require 'follow-up' by a more sensitive instrument or different type of instrument (usually a spectrometer)

So, every follow up survey naturally brings to multi-wavelengths catalogues, right?

zhermes said:
As you say, 'pipeline' generally refers to the process of data-reduction. More specifically it usually refers to a well established, largely (or entirely) automated series of data-reduction processes associated with a particular instrument or type of data. This 'pipeline' is generally applied to virtually every element of data obtained through the given instrument. The 'pipeline' generally contains all of the basic operations that aren't especially interested to researchers. Sometimes the following stages of processing are referred to as 'post-processing' and are usually more complicated, and more situation specific --- thus requiring more involvement of the researcher.

Is it possible for you to give a "simple" example of data reduction (with programs, procedures, etc.)? FITS files are reduced files?
 
  • #4
RHK said:
So, every follow up survey naturally brings to multi-wavelengths catalogues, right?
That's generally the way it goes.

RHK said:
Is it possible for you to give a "simple" example of data reduction (with programs, procedures, etc.)? FITS files are reduced files?
The top section of this webpage might be informative: http://www.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/div/ir-interferometry/lndrs/index.html

FITS files can (and often are) used at all stages.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Thank you very much!
 

1. What is a follow-up in the context of scientific research?

A follow-up in scientific research refers to a subsequent study or investigation that is conducted after an initial study or experiment. It is typically done to gather more information or to verify the results of the previous study.

2. What is a pipeline in scientific research?

A pipeline in scientific research refers to a series of steps or processes that are used to carry out a particular research project. It can include activities such as data collection, analysis, and interpretation.

3. How is follow-up different from replication?

Follow-up and replication are both subsequent studies, but they differ in their purpose. Follow-up studies are usually done to gather more information or clarify the results of a previous study, while replication studies are done to reproduce the results of a previous study to test the validity and reliability of the findings.

4. What is the importance of conducting follow-up studies?

Follow-up studies are important in scientific research because they allow researchers to build upon previous findings and expand their knowledge on a particular topic. They can also help to identify any limitations or flaws in the initial study and provide further evidence to support or refute the results.

5. How do scientists determine which studies to include in their research pipeline?

Scientists usually determine which studies to include in their research pipeline based on the research question they are trying to answer. They review relevant literature and choose studies that provide the necessary information or data to address their research question. They may also consider the quality and relevance of the studies in their decision-making process.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
941
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
892
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
800
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
5
Views
656
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
47
Views
4K
Back
Top