Register to reply

Coincidence events

by Manojg
Tags: coincidence, events
Share this thread:
Manojg
#1
Oct11-13, 01:49 PM
P: 45
Hello,

I have a question about coincidence event. Let us take the decay of deuteron to proton and alpha particle, (d, pα). p and α goes in opposite direction. So, if we put two detectors in opposite directions, one of them will detect p and another will detect α simultaneously (within a small time window).

If the solid angle covered by both detectors are same (say Ω) and if one of the detector detect p then it is sure that another one will detect α. If N0 be the total decay rate then number of coincidence event detected will be N0Ω.

However, if the solid angle covered by the detectors are different, say Ω1 and Ω2 such that Ω1 > Ω2 then the number of coincidence event will be equal to the number of events detected by the second detector because other extra event detected by the larger detector won't be detected by the smaller detector.

Are these reasoning right? Because in a book, I saw the number of coincidence event is N0Ω1Ω2.

Thanks.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
New complex oxides could advance memory devices
Nature's designs inspire research into new light-based technologies
UCI team is first to capture motion of single molecule in real time
mfb
#2
Oct11-13, 07:25 PM
Mentor
P: 12,081
A deuteron is a stable nucleus with a single proton and a neutron. It cannot decay in the way you describe.
Lithium-5 quickly decays to proton+alpha particle - you have to produce it directly before the decay, and this usually will not happen without any momentum transfer.

If your decay is back to back:
If N0 be the total decay rate then number of coincidence event detected will be N0Ω.
Or 2 times this value, if both detectors are sensitive to both particles. And I guess you should divide it by the full solid angle of a sphere, or express Ω as ratio to that.

then the number of coincidence event will be equal to the number of events detected by the second detector because other extra event detected by the larger detector won't be detected by the smaller detector.
This is an upper limit.

Quote Quote by Manojg View Post
Are these reasoning right? Because in a book, I saw the number of coincidence event is N0Ω1Ω2.
That would correspond to independently moving, isotropic decay products.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
How to determined if events disjoin, when probaility of events is not given Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 9
Is this a coincidence? Electrical Engineering 0
Did I get it right by coincidence? Introductory Physics Homework 16
This is probably just a coincidence, but... Special & General Relativity 10
Question abount independence events and conditional events Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 4