Theoretical or Experimental Undergrad

[Kites]

Hello everyone,

I have a couple of hopefully easy questions about undergraduate degrees. I am a 3.74 GPA student at my university and am currently in my 3rd year of college, on a 5 year plan. I am a double major in both Physics and Applied Mathematics. The following are my questions.

1) Double Majoring

I have had some pressure in the past year from friends, family, professors and a patent lawyer to do this double major. Is it worth it? I honestly spend a massive amount of time studying and burn out is a concern and I was hoping to hear how helpful it actually pans out. Can I do better with it? Without it? How so?

I've read some of the responses in the past to this but none of the ones in the archive were really that satisfactory.

It might help if I give some light on to what I am hoping to do.

Rockets somehow, patent law, college level teaching.

(ideas that I have, I really don't know too much about what I can do as a career with what I am learning)

2) Theoretical or Experimental Undergrad

I read a post recently where someone said "...Theoretical Physics (ugh)..." to quote them. Why is this such a bad point? I could use some clarification as I am starting my specification of my degree in my next quarter. Mostly I could just use some information on it against experimental.

I appreciate all of your opinions. Much thanks.

 

[mgiddy911]

About Double Majoring
It is generally a good thing iff you can handle it and it doesn't adversely affect your GPA
Another thing to think about is what the two majors are, as this will have a big impact on what effect the double major has on anyone who sees it. For example (no offense) your double major in Physics and applied maths is great, but there is probably a large over lap between classes you need for the physics major and classes you need for the maths major.
It may look better than a regular physics degree if you keep your grades up, but something people like to see is majors in different subjects. Like doubles in Physics and Chem, Physics and English, Physics and Dance or Theatre or Choir, that is what will really stand out on an application.

About Theo v. Experimental in undergrad
I have had this discussion recently with one or two people. I believe the general consensus was that at the undergrad level there isn't too much of a difference between experimental and theoretical tracks. (Here I am open to new information as I don't know every school's curriculum)
Generally the experimental track has more required labs and the theo track has more required math classes. For example you may need a full year of modern physics lab for a general physics degree but only 1 semester for a theo phys/ applied maths degree
Maybe the general physics degree requires optic and optics lab, solid state physics, or electronic plus lab, where as the theo phys degree would have a couple classes from advanced classical mechanics, or advanced EM, or advanced QM

 

[Mene]

Hello,

I can offer some insight into your questions about double majoring and choosing between theoretical or experimental undergraduate studies.

1) Double Majoring:

Whether or not it is worth it to double major depends on your personal goals and interests. It can certainly be beneficial in terms of expanding your knowledge and skills in different areas and making you more versatile in the job market. However, it also requires a significant amount of time and effort, as you have already mentioned. It is important to consider if the extra workload and potential burnout are worth it to you. It may be helpful to speak with advisors or professionals in your desired field to get a better understanding of how a double major may benefit you in your specific career goals. Ultimately, it is up to you to weigh the pros and cons and decide if it aligns with your personal and professional aspirations.

2) Theoretical or Experimental Undergrad:

Theoretical and experimental physics are two different approaches to studying the same subject. Theoretical physics involves using mathematical models and equations to understand and explain physical phenomena, while experimental physics involves conducting experiments and collecting data to understand the same phenomena. Both are important and valuable in the field of physics, and it ultimately depends on your interests and strengths as to which one you should pursue. Some people may find theoretical physics more challenging or less interesting, while others may prefer the hands-on aspect of experimental physics. It is important to explore both areas and see which one resonates with you the most. Keep in mind that regardless of which path you choose, having a strong foundation in both theoretical and experimental concepts is beneficial in the long run.

In terms of the negative connotation towards theoretical physics, it may stem from the misconception that theoretical physics is purely theoretical and has no practical applications. However, many groundbreaking discoveries and advancements in science and technology have been made through theoretical physics. It is a crucial and respected field in the scientific community.

I hope this helps guide your decision-making process. It's great that you are considering all aspects and seeking advice from others. Good luck with your studies and future career pursuits!