Is every manifold triangulable?

  • Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Manifold
In summary: C¹-complex is a triangulation.This is referenced in Whitney's geometric integration p.124. It seems that Whitney was aware of this paper and was citing it.
  • #1
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,807
32
In Lee's Intro to topological manifolds, p.105, it is written that every manifold of dimension 3 or below is triangulable. But in dimension 4, threre are known examples of non triangulable manifolds. In dimensions greater than four, the answer is unknown.

But in Bott-Tu p.190, it is written that every manifold admits a triangulation.

Which is right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
quasar987 said:
In Lee's Intro to topological manifolds, p.105, it is written that every manifold of dimension 3 or below is triangulable. But in dimension 4, threre are known examples of non triangulable manifolds. In dimensions greater than four, the answer is unknown.

But in Bott-Tu p.190, it is written that every manifold admits a triangulation.

Which is right?

I would guess that Bott and Tu mean every smooth manifold since their book is about differential topology. It is a theorem of Whitehead, I believe, that every smooth manifold has a smooth triangulation.
 
  • #3
It seems that the authors probably have different definitions of triangulation.
In my opinion, the problem boils down to whether every interval isomorphic to some interval in R^n is triangulable & hence the second statement looks good.
 
  • #4
quasar987 said:
In Lee's Intro to topological manifolds, p.105, it is written that every manifold of dimension 3 or below is triangulable. But in dimension 4, threre are known examples of non triangulable manifolds. In dimensions greater than four, the answer is unknown.

But in Bott-Tu p.190, it is written that every manifold admits a triangulation.

Which is right?

R. ]Kirby and L. C. Siebenmann, On the triangulation of manifolds and the hauptvermutung,
Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 75 (1969), 742-749.

This paper is said to have an example of a non-triangulable 6 manifold
 
  • #6
lavinia said:
I would guess that Bott and Tu mean every smooth manifold since their book is about differential topology. It is a theorem of Whitehead, I believe, that every smooth manifold has a smooth triangulation.

In Whitney's geometric integration p.124, he credits S.S. Cains (1934) with Whitehead (1940) giving an improvement of the proof in "On C¹ complexes, Annals of Math. 41"
 

1. What is a manifold?

A manifold is a mathematical object that is locally similar to Euclidean space. It is a topological space that is smooth and can be described by coordinates and equations.

2. What does it mean for a manifold to be triangulable?

A manifold is triangulable if it can be divided into smaller pieces, called simplices, that can be pieced together to form the manifold. This process is similar to dividing a surface into smaller triangles.

3. Is every manifold triangulable?

The answer is no. There are certain manifolds, such as non-orientable manifolds, that cannot be triangulated. This is known as the Hauptvermutung, a conjecture in topology that has not yet been proven.

4. Why is the question of triangulability important?

Triangulability of manifolds is important because it allows for easier visualization and understanding of these mathematical objects. It also has applications in fields such as differential geometry and topology.

5. Are there any conditions that guarantee a manifold to be triangulable?

Yes, there are certain conditions, such as the PL condition and the piecewise linear homotopy condition, that guarantee a manifold to be triangulable. However, these conditions are not easily verified for all manifolds.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
128
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
1
Views
7K
Back
Top