
#1
Nov1412, 07:37 AM

P: 26

Hi
We can derive equation [itex]\nabla.D=\rho_f[/itex] from equation [itex]\nabla.E=\rho/\epsilon_0[/itex]. But what about Ampere's law? I tried to derive [itex]\nabla\times{H}=J_f+\partial{D}/\partial{t}[/itex] from [itex]\nabla\times{B}=\mu_0J+\epsilon_0\mu_0\partial{E}/\partial{t}[/itex] but I could not. This is strange because I thought that Maxwell's equations in vacuum are enough for studying electromagnetic field in any matter and that Maxwell's equations in matter are derivable from them. 



#2
Nov1412, 08:05 AM

Mentor
P: 10,840

They are, if you add some assumptions about the material  D proportional (and parallel) to E and so on.
For materials where this is not true, I don't know. 



#3
Nov1412, 08:14 AM

P: 26

[itex]\partial{D}/\partial{t}=\epsilon_0\partial{E}/\partial{t}+\partial{P}/\partial{t}[/itex]. The second term is underivable from Ampere's law in vacuum.




#4
Nov1412, 08:34 AM

Mentor
P: 10,840

question about Ampere's law in vacuum and in matter
Add the assumption that ##D \propto E##, and it works.
In general, this can be wrong, but I don't know if the regular Maxwell equations work there at all. If ##\epsilon_r## is a tensor (or nonlinear), things can get difficult. 



#5
Nov1412, 08:44 AM

P: 26

Dear mfb,
I think I found the solution. [itex]\partial{P}/\partial{t}[/itex] is some kind of current (bound charges are moving). So if we write total current density as [itex]J=J_f+\nabla\times{M}+J_p[/itex] where [itex]J_p[/itex] is polarization current density, we can solve the problem. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Dark matter may be an illusion caused by the quantum vacuum  Astrophysics  15  
Dark Matter and the vacuum energy  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  2  
Vacuum fluctuations and matter  Quantum Physics  14  
Does vacuum energy rely on the existence of matter?  Astrophysics  7  
Dark Matter & Energy/Mass of False Vacuum  General Astronomy  16 