Numeral value of this Sin(1)*Sin(2)*Sin(3)* *Sin(89)

  • Thread starter hadi amiri 4
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Value
In summary: Oops, still not quite right.Ok let me get it right this time.In summary, the numeral value of Sin(1)*Sin(2)*Sin(3)*...*Sin(89) is approximately 2^(-85.75) or more precisely, it can be simplified to \sqrt{179/2} \, \times \, 2^{-89} using trigonometric and product-to-sum formulas. This result can also be derived from the nth roots of unity and the equation 1+x+...+x^(n-1)=(x-z)(x-z^2)...(x-z^(n-1)).
  • #1
hadi amiri 4
98
1
find the numeral value of this
Sin(1)*Sin(2)*Sin(3)*...*Sin(89)
Note:the numbers in brackets are degree
 
  • Like
Likes Mitanshu
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is this posted as a challenge for others, or do you want to try to solve it for yourself with some help?
 
  • #3
challenge of course!
 
  • #4
haha, this is a pretty cool little problem.
 
  • #5
Pair products of sines whose degrees add up to 90 i.e.
Sin(1)*Sin(2)*Sin(3)*...*Sin(89)=sin(1)*sin(89) * sin(2)*sin(88) * ... * sin(44)*sin(46) *sin(45)

Use the trigonometric product to sum formula, and cos(90)=0 to obtain

2^(-44) * cos(88)*cos(86)*cos(84)* ... *cos(2) * sin(45) = 2^(-44.5) * cos(88)*cos(2) * cos(86)* cos(4) * ... cos(46)*cos(44)

I guess that successive application of the product to sum forumula can now be used, but am too lazy to investigate further.

Numerical calculation gives an answer of about ~ 2^(-85.75) if it's any help.
 
  • #6
It's not quite so simple as successive applications of the exact same trick. If you went one further, then you would get pairings that don't quite add up to 90.

86 and 2; 82 and 6; 78 and 10, etc all add to 88
 
  • #7
maze said:
It's not quite so simple as successive applications of the exact same trick. If you went one further, then you would get pairings that don't quite add up to 90.

86 and 2; 82 and 6; 78 and 10, etc all add to 88

Yes, the next step could be

2^(-66.5) * sin(4) * sin(8) * sin(12) ... * sin(84) * sin(88)And then...?

:smile:
 
  • #8
this problem does not need a calculator
just some formulas and a creative brain
 
  • #9
But the answer is 0?
 
  • #10
The answer is 0 if and only if one of the terms of the product is zero. sin is not zero for any of the angles 1,2,3,..,89 degrees.
 
  • #12
For some reason I swear there is a nifty way to simplify [tex] \left( x - \frac{1}{x} \right)\left( x^2 - \frac{1}{x^2} \right)\left( x^3 - \frac{1}{x^3} \right)...\left( x^{89} - \frac{1}{x^{89}} \right)[/tex] but I can't see it right now. If so, then this problem is easily solved.
 
  • #13
That would be completely ignoring the possibly useful fact that cos(90) = 0. It is possible there is a nifty simplification for that product, but it would provide a much more general solution than needed.
 
  • #14
I got the same 22 term simplification as Kittel Knight. Has anyone found a better solution? Does someone want to post a clue as to the form of the answer we can expect?
 
  • #15
uart said:
I got the same 22 term simplification as Kittel Knight. Has anyone found a better solution? Does someone want to post a clue as to the form of the answer we can expect?
Look at the link yenchin posted. Another way to obtain the result in there is to consider the roots of the equation x^n-1=0, i.e. the nth roots of unity given by 1, z, z^2, ..., z^(n-1), where z=e^(2pi*i/n). This leads us to the equation 1+x+...+x^(n-1)=(x-z)(x-z^2)...(x-z^(n-1)). Plug in x=1 and take absolute values. Finally, try to find a nice expression for |1-z^k|. What do you get?
 
  • #16
morphism said:
Look at the link yenchin posted. Another way to obtain the result in there is to consider the roots of the equation x^n-1=0, i.e. the nth roots of unity given by 1, z, z^2, ..., z^(n-1), where z=e^(2pi*i/n). This leads us to the equation 1+x+...+x^(n-1)=(x-z)(x-z^2)...(x-z^(n-1)). Plug in x=1 and take absolute values. Finally, try to find a nice expression for |1-z^k|. What do you get?

Ok thanks morphism, somehow I missed that link before - very interesting result.

Anyway it follows immediately from that result that the sine product posed in this thread can be simplified to [itex]\sqrt{179/2} \, \times \, 2^{-89} [/itex]

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
uart said:
Ok thanks morphism, somehow I missed that link before - very interesting result.

Anyway it follows immediately from that result that the sine product posed in this thread can be simplified to [itex]\sqrt{179/2} \, \times \, 2^{-89} [/itex]

Thanks.

Ok let me get it right this time.

[itex]\sqrt{90} \, \times \, 2^{-89} [/itex]
 

1. What is the numeral value of Sin(1)*Sin(2)*Sin(3)* *Sin(89)?

The numeral value of Sin(1)*Sin(2)*Sin(3)* *Sin(89) is approximately 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000227.

2. How did you calculate the numeral value of Sin(1)*Sin(2)*Sin(3)* *Sin(89)?

The numeral value was calculated using a scientific calculator or a computer program that can handle very small numbers. The values of the sine function for each angle were multiplied together to get the final result.

3. Why is the numeral value of Sin(1)*Sin(2)*Sin(3)* *Sin(89) so small?

This is because the values of the sine function for angles close to 90 degrees become very small. When these small values are multiplied together, the result becomes even smaller.

4. Can the numeral value of Sin(1)*Sin(2)*Sin(3)* *Sin(89) be simplified?

Yes, the numeral value can be simplified by using trigonometric identities. For example, Sin(90-x) = Cos(x), so the expression can be rewritten as Cos(1)*Cos(2)*Cos(3)* *Cos(89). However, the value will still be very small.

5. What is the significance of calculating the numeral value of Sin(1)*Sin(2)*Sin(3)* *Sin(89)?

This calculation may have applications in mathematics and physics, where small values are important. It also demonstrates the precision of mathematical functions and the limitations of our numerical systems.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
713
Replies
2
Views
947
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
747
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
659
Back
Top