Why Does Ohm's Law Hold in Resistive Materials?

  • Thread starter DougBTX
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Textbook
In summary, Ohm's law is an empirical description of the behavior of charges in a resistive medium, which states that the current density is proportional to the applied electric field. This can be derived from Maxwell's equations and is considered more fundamental than Newton's laws which are not derived from other principles. Ohm's law is surprising in that it holds despite the fact that accelerating charges should increase the current, but this is balanced by collisions between electrons leading to a steady state.
  • #1
DougBTX
Paul Tipler said:
Ohm's law is not a fundamental law of nature, like Newton's laws or the laws of thermodynamics, but rather an empirical description of a property shared by many materials

This sounds wrong to me - Ohm's laws don't apply to all materials, but Newton's laws don't apply at all speeds; what makes one more "fundamental" than the other? Is it just that it took longer for people to find exceptions?

Douglas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think he had in mind the fact that Ohm's law can be derived from a description of the behavior of charge carriers and their interaction with the material, which are basically an application of Mazwell's equations, while Newton's laws are not explained from other ("more basic") principles. In the case of Newton's laws, you either start from them, or replace them with a new description of spacetime itself.
 
  • #3
Doug,

Is there any context to those comments? I think it's pointless to "debate" the matter without some context.
 
  • #4
Ohms law is an empirical statement, like hookes law, "the current density is proportional to the applied force". Since the applied force is an electric voltage:

J = s*E where s is the conductivity, J is the current density and E is the electric field. This is the real ohms law, from which it is possible to derive V =IR.

If you think about it, it is surprising that ohm's law should ever hold. E accelerates charges, so as they accelerate, the current should go up! Then V = IR would depend on how long V has been running.

The solution of course (because ohm's empirical law fits the data) is that changes in the wire propagate so fast, the current quickly settles into a steady state due to collisions between electrons balancing the net acceleration due to the E field.

This is adapted from Grifith's Electrodynamics, which is a great book. He explains it better than I do.

Anyway, it should be easy now to see why Newtons laws are more fundamental (not absolutely fundamental of course) than Ohms Law.
 
  • #5
Crosson,

If you think about it, it is surprising that ohm's law should ever hold. E accelerates charges, so as they accelerate, the current should go up!

Not really. The point of Ohm's Law is that in a resistive medium a charge carrier (electron) experiences so many collisions that it very quickly achieves terminal velocity (aka drift velocity). Essentially, the current density will be a function of the applied electric field [j = j(E)] and, to lowest order, the current density varies directly with E with the proportionality constant being defined as the conductivity in an isotropic medium (it's a tensor in anisotropic media).
 

What is considered "odd textbook wording"?

Odd textbook wording refers to language used in textbooks that may be confusing, unclear, or difficult to understand. It can include complex sentence structures, technical jargon, or unfamiliar terminology.

Why is odd textbook wording a common issue in scientific textbooks?

Odd textbook wording is often a result of trying to convey complex scientific concepts in a concise and precise manner. Authors may also use technical terms and language to maintain the credibility and authority of the information presented.

How does odd textbook wording impact students' understanding of the material?

Odd textbook wording can make it difficult for students to understand and retain information. It can also lead to confusion, frustration, and a lack of interest in the subject. Students may also rely on outside sources for clarification, which can be time-consuming and unreliable.

What can be done to improve odd textbook wording?

Authors can use clear and concise language, avoid unnecessary jargon, and provide context and explanations for complex concepts. Publishers can also seek input from students and educators to ensure the language used is accessible and understandable.

How can students better navigate odd textbook wording?

Students can actively engage with the material by breaking down complex sentences, looking up unfamiliar terms, and seeking clarification from their teacher or peers. They can also use online resources or study groups to better understand difficult material.

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
Back
Top